Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Books/One Nation Under Gods/Use of sources/John Taylor September 1886 revelation"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles FAIR copyright}} +{{FairMormon}}))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
+
{{FairMormon}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
 
{{Resource Title|Did John Taylor receive a revelation on September 27, 1886 that promised that “polygamy would never be abandoned?”}}
 
{{Resource Title|Did John Taylor receive a revelation on September 27, 1886 that promised that “polygamy would never be abandoned?”}}
 
{{FAIRAnalysisHeader
 
{{FAIRAnalysisHeader

Revision as of 08:30, 8 June 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Did John Taylor receive a revelation on September 27, 1886 that promised that “polygamy would never be abandoned?”


A FAIR Analysis of:
One Nation Under Gods
A work by author: Richard Abanes

Author's Claims


One Nation Under Gods, page 316 (hardback and paperback)

The author asserts that John Taylor received a revelation on September 27, 1886 that promised that the practice of plural marriage would never be abandoned.

Author's Sources


Endnote 15, page 587 (hardback); page 585 (paperback)

  • Fred C. Collier, Unpublished Revelations, vol. 1, 145-146, 180-183.

Other source(s) of the criticism

  • John W. Taylor—claimed that the revelation read "the Law of Plural Marriage was Eternal." This phrase is not, however, in the revelation. (See diary of Heber J. Grant, 30 September 1890).
  1. REDIRECTJohn Taylor's statements regarding polygamy#Did John Taylor receive a revelation on September 27, 1886 that promised that polygamy would never be abandoned by the Church?


Notes