|
|
| (51 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | __NOTOC__
| + | {{Main Page}} |
| − | {{FAIRAnalysisHeader | + | {{H1 |
| − | |title=[[../../]] | + | |L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/One Nation Under Gods/Use of sources/John Taylor September 1886 revelation |
| − | |author=Richard Abanes | + | |H=Did John Taylor receive a revelation on September 27, 1886 that promised that “polygamy would never be abandoned?” |
| − | |noauthor= | + | |S= |
| − | |section=[[../../Use of sources|Use of sources]], John Taylor received a revelation saying polygamy would never be abandoned | + | |L1= |
| − | |previous=[[../An Example of Biased Histories|An Example of Biased Histories]] | + | |T=[[../../|One Nation Under Gods]] |
| − | |next=[[../Destroying Governments and Religions|Destroying Governments and Religions]] | + | |A=Richard Abanes |
| − | |notes={{AuthorsDisclaimer}}
| + | |<=[[../Damned without plural marriage|Damned without plural marriage]] |
| | + | |>=[[../Polygamy absolutely essential to godhood|Polygamy absolutely essential to godhood]] |
| | }} | | }} |
| − | =John Taylor received a revelation saying polygamy would never be abandoned=
| + | <onlyinclude> |
| − | ==The Quotes==
| + | {{Author claims label}} |
| − | ===One Nation under Gods, page 316 (hardback)===
| |
| | | | |
| − | *Did John Taylor receive a revelation on September 27, 1886 that promised that “polygamy would never be abandoned?”
| + | ===One Nation Under Gods, page 316 (hardback and paperback)=== |
| | | | |
| − | ===One Nation under Gods, page YYYY (paperback)===
| + | The author asserts that John Taylor received a revelation on September 27, 1886 that promised that the practice of plural marriage would never be abandoned. |
| | | | |
| − | {{nw}} | + | {{Author sources label}} |
| | | | |
| − | ==The References==
| + | ===Endnote 15, page 587 (hardback); page 585 (paperback)=== |
| − | ===Endnote 15, page 585 (hardback)=== | |
| | | | |
| | *Fred C. Collier, ''Unpublished Revelations'', vol. 1, 145-146, 180-183. | | *Fred C. Collier, ''Unpublished Revelations'', vol. 1, 145-146, 180-183. |
| | | | |
| − | ===Endnote 15, page ZZZZ (paperback)=== | + | ===Other source(s) of the criticism=== |
| | + | * John W. Taylor—claimed that the revelation read "the Law of Plural Marriage was Eternal." This phrase is not, however, in the revelation. (See diary of Heber J. Grant, 30 September 1890). |
| | | | |
| − | {{nw}} | + | {{:Question: Did John Taylor receive a revelation on September 27, 1886 that promised that polygamy would never be abandoned by the Church?}} |
| | + | </onlyinclude> |
| | + | {{endnotes sources}} |
| | | | |
| − | ==The Problem==
| |
| | | | |
| − | '''''Note:''''' For a detailed look at this document, see Brian C. Hales, "An 1886 Revelation to John Taylor," ''mormonfundamentalism'' (accessed 14 January 2009) {{link|url=http://mormonfundamentalism.com/NEWFILES/1886RevelationNew.htm}} Except where noted, the historical information in this article relies heavily on the work done by Hales.
| |
| | | | |
| − | ==The document==
| + | <!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE --> |
| − | | |
| − | A document that is apparently in John Taylor's handwriting was found among his papers after his death. It appears to be in his handwriting, and it is probably genuine,{{ref|taylorwriting.1}} though some past Church officials have been skeptical.{{ref|skeptical.1}} The text reads:
| |
| − | | |
| − | :You have asked me concerning the new and everlasting covenant and how far it is binding upon my people.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Thus saith the Lord—All commandments that I have given must be obeyed by those calling themselves by my name, unless they are revoked by me, or by my authority, and how can I revoke an everlasting covenant? For I, the Lord, am everlasting, and My everlasting covenant cannot be abrogated nor done away with, but they stand forever.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Have I not given my word in great plainness on this subject? Yet have not great numbers of my people been negligent in the observance of my law and the keeping of my commandments? Yet I have borne with them these many years, and this because of their weakness, because of the perilous times.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :And, furthermore, it is now pleasing to me that men should use their free agency in regard to these matters; nevertheless I, the Lord, do not change, and my word, and my law, and my covenants do not.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :And as I have heretofore said by my servant Joseph: All those who would enter into my glory must and shall obey my law and have I not commanded men, that if they were Abraham's seed and would enter into my glory they must do the works of Abraham? I have not revoked this law nor will I, for it is everlasting and those who will enter into my glory must obey the conditions thereof.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Even so Amen.{{ref|revelation.text}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Analysis==
| |
| − | | |
| − | John Taylor, so far as is known, did not discuss this revelation with anyone. It was also never canonized as binding upon the Church.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The critics—and "Mormon fundamentalists" who use this document as justification for the continued practice of plural marriage—argue that this document claims that polygamy will never be abandoned by the Church.
| |
| − | | |
| − | However, this is ''not'' what the text says. It declares, rather, that "You have asked me concerning the new and everlasting covenant....My everlasting covenant cannot be abrogated nor done away with, but they stand forever."
| |
| − | | |
| − | It is common for critics to insist that "the new and everlasting covenant" can only refer to plural marriage. But, this is not consistent with LDS scripture:
| |
| − | * the Old Testament frequently referred to the "everlasting covenant" which God had established with Noah (), and Israel ().
| |
| − | * Hebrews asserts that Christ's sacrifice is the basis of the "everlasting covenant": Now the God of peace, that brought again from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great shepherd of the sheep, through the blood of the everlasting covenant... ({{b||Hebrews|13|20}}).
| |
| − | * in 1830, the Lord declared of baptism into the restored Church: "this is a new and an everlasting covenant, even that which was from the beginning" ({{s||DC|22|1}}).
| |
| − | | |
| − | None of these covenants had anything necessarily to do with plural marriage; they certainly did not ''exclusively'' refer to plural marriage.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The Doctrine and Covenants frequently refers to the covenant, and it is clear that the reference is to the gospel covenant, not to plural marriage:
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | D&C 49; Wherefore, I will that all men shall repent, for all are under sin, except those which I have reserved unto myself, holy men that ye know not of. Wherefore, I say unto you that I have sent unto you mine everlasting covenant, even that which was from the beginning ({{s||DC|49|8-9}}).
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ==Endnotes==
| |
| − | | |
| − | #{{note|taylorwriting.1}} Max Anderson, ''Polygamy Story'', 63-76; {{Dialogue1|author=D. Michael Quinn|article=LDS Church Authority and New Plural Marriages, 1890–1904|vol=18|num=1|date=Spring 1985|start= 29 n. 90}}
| |
| − | #{{note|skeptical.1}} Hales discusses Anthony W. Ivins' opinion (footnote 25), and Mark E. Petersen (footnote 2; quoting Quinn, 29 n. 90).
| |
| − | #{{note|revelation.text}} Cited in "The Trial of Apostle John W. Taylor." Also in "Revelations in Addition to Those Found in the LDS Edition of the Doctrine and Covenants," ''New Mormon Studies CD-ROM,'' (Signature Books in association with Smith Research Associates).
| |
| − | =Further reading=
| |
| − | {{FAIRAnalysisWiki}}
| |
