Ero sivun ”Malline:CriticalWork:Southerton:Losing:Repeat:Members discouraged” versioiden välillä

p (Created page with '* Members are encouraged not to focus on the geography to the exclusion of the Book's more important spiritual message. BYU and FARMS (now the Maxwell Institute) have published a…')
 
p (Don't need interwiki links between templates)
 
(Yhtä välissä olevaa versiota toisen käyttäjän tekemänä ei näytetä)
Rivi 1: Rivi 1:
 
* Members are encouraged not to focus on the geography to the exclusion of the Book's more important spiritual message. BYU and FARMS (now the Maxwell Institute) have published a great deal of member scholarship on geography, however. If the Church opposed this, it could easily be stopped.  
 
* Members are encouraged not to focus on the geography to the exclusion of the Book's more important spiritual message. BYU and FARMS (now the Maxwell Institute) have published a great deal of member scholarship on geography, however. If the Church opposed this, it could easily be stopped.  
 
* {{Repeat|#43|#142|#205|l1=43|l2=142|l3=205}}
 
* {{Repeat|#43|#142|#205|l1=43|l2=142|l3=205}}
* Ironically, the author knows that there is no official geography (see [[#205|p. 205]]) but continues to act as if it scandalous that the Church does not preach a non-official idea as official—perhaps hoping we will conclude that the model ''he'' describes is the official one which the Church dare not renounce.
+
* Ironically, the author knows that there is no official geography (see [[#205|p. 205]]) but continues to act as if it scandalous that the Church does not preach a non-official idea as official&mdash;perhaps hoping we will conclude that the model ''he'' describes is the official one which the Church dare not renounce.<noinclude>
 +
</noinclude>

Nykyinen versio 6. kesäkuuta 2017 kello 13.19

  • Members are encouraged not to focus on the geography to the exclusion of the Book's more important spiritual message. BYU and FARMS (now the Maxwell Institute) have published a great deal of member scholarship on geography, however. If the Church opposed this, it could easily be stopped.
The work repeats itself on p. 43, 142., and 205.
  • Ironically, the author knows that there is no official geography (see p. 205) but continues to act as if it scandalous that the Church does not preach a non-official idea as official—perhaps hoping we will conclude that the model he describes is the official one which the Church dare not renounce.