|
|
| (Yhtä välissä olevaa versiota toisen käyttäjän tekemänä ei näytetä) |
| Rivi 2: |
Rivi 2: |
| | | | |
| | =Mormonism and Wikipedia= | | =Mormonism and Wikipedia= |
| − | {{Epigraph|It is easy enough to spin webs of speculation...''
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | —Dr. John Matzko, Professor of History, Bob Jones University.<br>
| |
| − | "The Encounter of the Young Joseph Smith with Presbyterianism," ''Dialogue'' 40/3 (2007), p. 77 }}
| |
| − | {{parabreak}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {{Epigraph|...every time you start citing Wikipedia rules, I tune them out as Mormon smokescreen.<br>
| |
| − | —Wikipedia editor John "Foxe" (23 July 2007) {{link|url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:First_Vision/Archive_6#Breaking_the_collaborative_truce}} }}
| |
| − | {{parabreak}}
| |
| − | ==FAIR's approach to Wikipedia articles==
| |
| − | FAIR regularly receives queries about specific LDS-themed Wikipedia articles with requests that we somehow "fix" them. Although some individual members of FAIR may choose to edit Wikipedia articles, FAIR as an organization does not. Controversial Wikipedia articles require constant maintenance and a significant amount of time. We prefer instead to respond to claims in the FAIR Wiki rather than fight the ongoing battle that LDS Wikipedia articles sometimes invite. From FAIR’s perspective, assertions made in LDS-themed Wikipedia articles are therefore treated just like any other critical (or, if one prefers, "anti-Mormon") work.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Given the fluid nature of LDS Wikipedia articles, it is pointless to perform a detailed review and analysis of many of them. There is a specific subset of LDS articles, however, that has been "stabilized" by one editor critical of LDS views, thus allowing us to perform a more detailed analysis.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Editors who wish to participate in editing LDS-themed Wikipedia articles can access the project page here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Latter_Day_Saint_movement Wikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement]. You are not required to be LDS in order to participate--there are a number of good non-LDS editors who have made valuable contributions to these articles.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The following sub-articles discuss various aspects of editing LDS-themed articles on Wikipedia. In addition, we analyze certain selected Wikipedia articles for accuracy and fairness.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===Common questions FAIR is asked about LDS Wikipedia articles===
| |
| − | {{Main|/Questions|l1=Common questions FAIR is asked about LDS Wikipedia articles}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===Who edits LDS Wikipedia articles?===
| |
| − | {{Main|/Editors|l1=Editors of LDS related Wikipedia articles}}
| |
| − | Who edits LDS Wikipedia articles? We introduce you to a few of the critical editors who have caught our attention that you are most likely to encounter.
| |
| | | | |
| | ===The perils of editing LDS Wikipedia articles=== | | ===The perils of editing LDS Wikipedia articles=== |
| | {{Main|/Academic among amateurs|l1=A study in contrasts: An academic among amateurs}} | | {{Main|/Academic among amateurs|l1=A study in contrasts: An academic among amateurs}} |
| | What happens when a "real world" academic attempts to improve Wikipedia articles and make them reflect his version of "truth?" We discuss the issue in detail here. | | What happens when a "real world" academic attempts to improve Wikipedia articles and make them reflect his version of "truth?" We discuss the issue in detail here. |
| − |
| |
| − | ===FAIR's analysis of LDS Wikipedia articles===
| |
| − | We examine selected Wikipedia articles and examine them on a "claim-by-claim" basis, with links to responses in the FAIR Wiki.
| |
| − | ====An analysis of the Wikipedia article "First Vision"====
| |
| − | {{Main|/First Vision|l1=First Vision}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ====An analysis of the Wikipedia article "Joseph Smith, Jr."====
| |
| − | {{Main|/Joseph Smith, Jr.|l1=Joseph Smith, Jr.}}
| |
| − | {{Suggestions}}
| |
What happens when a "real world" academic attempts to improve Wikipedia articles and make them reflect his version of "truth?" We discuss the issue in detail here.
