FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Pregunta: ¿Qué significa el Libro de Mormón cuando dice que cosas "claras y preciosas" han sido sacadas de la Biblia?
Revisión del 10:29 4 nov 2007 de AndrewMiller (discusión | contribuciones)
Escrito perdido | Cita bíblica |
---|---|
El libro de las batallas de Jehová | Números 21:14 |
El libro de Jaser | Josué 10:13, 2 Samuel 1:18 |
El libro de los hechos de Salomón | 1 Reyes 11:41 |
El libro de las crónicas de Samuel vidente | 1 Crónicas 29:29 |
El libro de las crónicas de Gad vidente | 1 Crónicas 29:29 |
El libro de las crónicas del profeta Natán | 1 Crónicas 29:29, 2 Crónicas 9:29 |
La profecía de Ahías | 2 Crónicas 9:29 |
La profecía del vidente Iddo | 2 Crónicas 9:29, 2 Crónicas 12:15, 2 Crónicas 13:22 |
El leibro del profeta Semaías | 2 Crónicas 12:15 |
Las palabras de Jehú hijo de Hanani | 2 Crónicas 20:34 |
Las palabras de los videntes | 2 Crónicas 33:19 |
La verdadera primera epístola de Pablo a los Corintios | 1 Corintios 5:9 |
La primera epístula de Pablo a los Efesios | Efesios 3:3 |
La epístula de Pablo a la iglesia en Laodicea | Colosenses 4:16 |
El libro de Enoch | San Judas 1:14-15 |
Examples of canonical differences among Bibles
The picture is further complicated by the fact that Christians have not always agreed on the "canon"—that is, they have not always agreed upon which writings were "scripture" and which were not.
Some examples of these variations:
Christian Person or Group | Difference in canon from Protestant Bible (eg KJV) |
---|---|
Catholics | Apocrypha is canonical |
Orthodox | Apocrypha is canonical |
Clement of Alexanderia (A.D. 200) | Included in canon:
|
Roman Christians (circa A.D. 200) | Included in canon:
Excluded from canon:
|
Origen (date) | Included in canon:
Excluded from canon:
|
Syriac Peshitta | Excluded from the canon:
|
Armenian Church | Included in canon:
Excluded from canon:
|
Ethiopian Church | Included in canon:
|
Martin Luther | Considered Epistle of James "a right strawy epistle."[8] Also didn't agree with Sermon on the Mount because didn't match his "grace only" theology. |
Implications for inerrancy and sufficiency doctrine of the Bible
All these canons cannot be correct. Why must we accept that the critic's Bible is complete and inerrant? By what authority is this declared? Such an authority would have to be outside the Bible, thus demonstrating that there is some other source for the Word of God besides the Bible.
Furthermore, one should remember that Biblical writers were not aware of the Bible canon, because the Bible was not compiled until centuries later. Thus, Biblical writers cannot have referred to completeness and sufficiency of the canon, because the canon did not exist.
La conclusión
1. Los autores bíblicos consideraron escrituras verdaderas a unos escritos que no están en la Biblia hoy en día.
2. Los grupos cristianos ni pueden ponerse de acuerdo en que libros deben estar canonizados en la Biblia.
3. Las personas y los grupos religiosos que creen que la Biblia es inerrante y suficiente tiene que contestar:
- a) ¿cuál de los “cánones” es el verdadero?
- b) ¿Cómo es que el canon suyo es autorizado?
Los cánones distintos entre varios grupos cristianos y el hecho de que hay escritos que los autores bíblicos tenían que ahora están perdidos demuestra que la doctrina de la inerrancia y la suficiencia de la Biblia no es coherente y no tiene sentido ni razón.
Notas de pie
- [back] Plantilla:ComparingLDSBeliefs
- [back] Mike Ash, "Is the Bible Complete?": 1. PDF link
- [back] Plantilla:ComparingLDSBeliefs; citing Clyde L. Manschreck, A History of Christianity in the World, 2d. ed. (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1985), 52.
- [back] Mike Ash, "Is the Bible Complete?": 1. PDF link
- [back] William J. Hamblin and Daniel C. Peterson, "The Evangelical Is Our Brother (Review of How Wide the Divide? A Mormon and an Evangelical in Conversation)," FARMS Review of Books 11/2 (1999): 178–209. off-site (Inglés); citing Kurt Aland, Nestle-Aland Greek-English New Testament, 5th ed. (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1990), 769–75; see also Craig A. Evans, Noncanonical Writings and New Testament Interpretation (Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1992), 190–219, who provides almost 1,500 quotations, allusions, and parallels between noncanonical sources and the New Testament.
- [back] William J. Hamblin and Daniel C. Peterson, "The Evangelical Is Our Brother (Review of How Wide the Divide? A Mormon and an Evangelical in Conversation)," FARMS Review of Books 11/2 (1999): 178–209. off-site (Inglés)
- [back] William J. Hamblin and Daniel C. Peterson, "The Evangelical Is Our Brother (Review of How Wide the Divide? A Mormon and an Evangelical in Conversation)," FARMS Review of Books 11/2 (1999): 178–209. off-site (Inglés)
- [back] Timothy George, "'A Right Strawy Epistle': Reformation Perspectives on James," The Southern Baptist Journal of Theology (Fall 2000), 20–31. PDF link