Diferencia entre revisiones de «Pregunta: ¿Se tergiversan algunas publicaciones mormonas como publicaciones "oficiales" de la Iglesia?»

(m)
 
 
(No se muestran 9 ediciones intermedias de 3 usuarios)
Línea 1: Línea 1:
{{Artículos FairMormon copyright}}
+
{{FairMormon}}
{{título del recurso|¿Están algunas publicaciones falsificar para publicaciones "oficiales" de la Iglesia?}}
+
<onlyinclude>
== ==
+
==Pregunta: ¿Se tergiversan algunas publicaciones mormonas como publicaciones "oficiales" de la Iglesia?==
{{designación pregunta}}
+
{{translate}}
 +
===Some tend to misrepresent whether or not a publication is officially sanctioned by the Church in order to suit their agenda.===
  
* Se afirma que algunas publicaciones son las publicaciones oficiales de la Iglesia, cuando en realidad no lo son.  
+
*It is claimed that some publications are official Church publications when in reality they are not.
D. ** Michael Quinn afirmó que la'' Enciclopedia del mormonismo'' "era un producto oficial de la Iglesia SUD."  
+
**D. Michael Quinn claimed that the ''Encyclopedia of Mormonism'' "was an official product of the LDS Church."
* Se afirma que algunas publicaciones son'' no'' publicaciones oficiales de la Iglesia, cuando en realidad son.  
+
*It is claimed that some publications are ''not'' official Church publications when in reality they are.
** Richard Abanes afirma en'' Gods Convertirse'' que el libro "Principios del Evangelio" contiene un derecho de autor de 1978 por la Iglesia, pero el autor afirma que contiene una advertencia que indica que no es una publicación oficial de la Iglesia, y que "los puntos de vista expresados ​​en este documento son responsabilidad de los autores y no representan la posición de la Iglesia."
+
**Richard Abanes states in ''Becoming Gods'' that the book "Gospel Principles" contains a 1978 copyright by the Church, but the author states that it contains a disclaimer that indicates that it is not an official publication of the Church, and that "the views expressed herein are the responsibility of the author and do not represent the position of the Church."
  
== ==
+
===The ''Encyclopedia of Mormonism'' was not an official production of the LDS Church===
{{designación conclusión}}
+
The author of ''Early Mormonism and the Magic World View'' wants to make the ''Encyclopedia of Mormonism'' an 'official' work, when the book, its editor, its authors, and publisher all assert that it is not.  
 
+
The Encyclopedia of Mormonism was not an official production of the LDS Church as the ''Church News'' noted:  
Algunos tienden a tergiversar o no una publicación con el respaldo oficial por la Iglesia con el fin de adaptarse a su agenda.
 
 
 
== ==
 
{{designación respuesta}}
 
 
 
===''La Enciclopedia del mormonismo''===
 
 
 
El autor de'' Early mormonismo y la magia del mundo'' quiere hacer el'' Enciclopedia del mormonismo'' un trabajo "oficial", cuando el libro, su editor, sus autores y el editor todos afirman que no lo es.  
 
* La Enciclopedia del mormonismo no era una producción oficial de la Iglesia SUD como la Iglesia'' Noticias'' señaló:
 
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
La enciclopedia, de acuerdo con su editor y el consejo de los editores, no es una publicación oficial de la Iglesia. Daniel H. Ludlow, editor en jefe, hizo hincapié en que la enciclopedia no pretende ser un sustituto de las Escrituras, las otras publicaciones oficiales de la Iglesia o doctrinas que se enseñan por los apóstoles y profetas.{{ref|avant}}
+
The encyclopedia, according to its publisher and board of editors, is not an official publication of the Church. Daniel H. Ludlow, editor-in-chief, emphasized that the encyclopedia is not intended as a substitute for the scriptures, other official publications of the Church or doctrines as taught by the apostles and prophets.<ref>Gerry Avant, "Encyclopedia of Mormonism," ''LDS Church News'' (12 July 1991). </ref>
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
* Esto se indica en la introducción a la ''Enciclopedia'':
+
This is indicated in the introduction to the ''Encyclopedia'':  
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
No sea que el papel de la Enciclopedia se dará más peso que se merece, los editores dejan claro que los que han escrito y editado sólo han tratado de explicar su comprensión de la historia de la Iglesia, doctrinas y procedimientos; sus declaraciones y opiniones siguen siendo los suyos. La Enciclopedia del mormonismo es un producto conjunto de la Universidad Brigham Young y Macmillan Publishing Company, y su contenido no representa necesariamente la postura oficial de La Iglesia de Jesucristo de los Santos de los Últimos Días. En ningún sentido tiene la Enciclopedia tiene la fuerza y la autoridad de las Escrituras. {{ref|ludlow}}
+
Lest the role of the Encyclopedia be given more weight than it deserves, the editors make it clear that those who have written and edited have only tried to explain their understanding of Church history, doctrines, and procedures; their statements and opinions remain their own. The Encyclopedia of Mormonism is a joint product of Brigham Young University and Macmillan Publishing Company, and its contents do not necessarily represent the official position of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In no sense does the Encyclopedia have the force and authority of scripture.<ref>{{EoM1 |author=Daniel H. Ludlow|article=Preface|vol=1|start=lxii}}</ref>
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
===''Principios del Evangelio''===
+
===''Gospel Principles'' is an official publication of the LDS Church===
 
+
From the title page of ''Gospel Principles'':
Desde la página de título de'' Principios del Evangelio'':
 
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
PRINCIPIOS DEL EVANGELIO
+
GOSPEL PRINCIPLES
  
Publicado por <br>  
+
Published by <br>
La Iglesia de Jesucristo de los Santos de los Últimos Días <br>  
+
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints <br>
 
Salt Lake City, Utah 1979.
 
Salt Lake City, Utah 1979.
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
En la siguiente página:
+
The next page:
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
Copyright (c) 1978 Corporación del Presidente <br>  
+
Copyright (c) 1978 Corporation of the President<br>
de la Iglesia de Jesucristo de los Santos de los Últimos Días <br>  
+
of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints <br>
Todos los derechos reservados <br>  
+
All Rights Reserved<br>
Impreso en los Estados Unidos de América. <br>
+
Printed in the United States of America.<br>
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
No podemos encontrar la exención de responsabilidad por parte del autor en'' Convertirse en Dioses'' sobre'''' Principios del Evangelio no son una publicación oficial.
+
We cannot find the disclaimer mentioned by the author in ''Becoming Gods'' about ''Gospel Principles'' not being an official publication.
  
===Estado de tramitación del Estudio de las Escrituras===
+
===Regarding the LDS Bible Dictionary, the Church has been explicit that it is not to be taken as a statement of revealed Church doctrine===
 +
Regarding the LDS Bible Dictionary, the Church has been explicit that it is not to be taken as a statement of revealed Church doctrine. The introduction to the Bible Dictionary includes the following statement:
  
En relación con el Estudio de las Escrituras LDS , la Iglesia ha sido explícito que no debe ser tomada como una declaración de doctrina de la Iglesia revelada. La introducción al Diccionario de la Biblia incluye la siguiente declaración:
+
<blockquote>
 +
[The Bible Dictionary] is not intended as an official or revealed endorsement by the Church of the doctrinal, historical, cultural, and other matters set forth.
 +
</blockquote>
  
: [ El Diccionario de la Biblia ] no pretende ser un endoso oficial o revelado por la Iglesia de los asuntos doctrinales , históricos , culturales y otros enunciados .
+
Robert J. Matthews, who was part of the committee in the late 1970s to create the LDS editions of the scriptures, including the study aids, said:
  
Robert J. Matthews , quien formó parte de la comisión a finales de 1970 para crear las ediciones SUD de las Escrituras , incluidas las ayudas para el estudio , dijo :
+
<blockquote>
 +
The new Bible dictionary is not intended as a revealed treatment or official version of doctrinal, historical, cultural, chronological, and other matters found in the Bible.<ref>{{Ensign1|author=Robert J. Matthews|article=[http://www.lds.org/ensign/1982/06/using-the-new-bible-dictionary-in-the-lds-edition?lang=eng Using the New Bible Dictionary in the LDS Edition]|date=June 1982|start=48}}</ref>
 +
</blockquote>
  
: . El nuevo diccionario de la Biblia no pretende ser un tratamiento de revelado o de la versión oficial de los asuntos doctrinales , históricos, culturales , cronológicos , y otros que se encuentran en la Biblia { { ref | matthews.48 } }
+
Elder Bruce R. McConkie had this to say regarding "the Joseph Smith Translation items, the chapter headings,
 +
Topical Guide, Bible Dictionary, footnotes, the Gazetteer, and the maps":
  
El élder Bruce R. McConkie dijo lo siguiente con respecto a " los elementos Traducción de José Smith, los títulos de los capítulos ,
+
<blockquote>
Guía para el Estudio de las Escrituras, las notas , el nomenclátor , y los mapas " :
+
None of these are perfect; they do not of themselves determine doctrine; there have been and undoubtedly now are mistakes in them. Cross-references, for instance, do not establish and never were intended to prove that parallel passages so much as pertain to the same subject. They are aids and helps only.<Ref>{{DoR1 |start=290}}</ref>
 +
</blockquote>
  
: Ninguno de ellos es perfecto ; que no de ellos mismos determinan la doctrina ; ha habido y , sin duda, ahora son errores en los mismos. Las referencias cruzadas , por ejemplo, no establecen ni nunca se pretendió demostrar que los pasajes paralelos tanto como pertenecer a un mismo tema . Se trata de ayudas y ayuda solamente.{{ref|mcconkie.290}}
+
To summarize, entries in the Bible Dictionary are not part of the canon of scripture and are not binding upon anyone, save as they accurately reflect the contents of scripture or joint statements by the prophets, seers, and revelators.
  
En resumen, las entradas en el Diccionario de la Biblia no son parte del canon de las Escrituras y no son vinculantes para cualquier persona, salvo en que reflejan con precisión el contenido de las escrituras o declaraciones conjuntas por los profetas, videntes y reveladores.
+
===Introductory material to the Book of Mormon is not regarded as scripture===
  
===Material introductorio al Libro de Mormón===
+
The only part of the Book of Mormon regarded as scripture is the original text as published by Joseph Smith, Jr., with a few changes later made by him or his successors for reasons of clarity or grammar.
  
La única parte del Libro de Mormón considerado como escritura es el texto original publicado por Joseph Smith, Jr., con unos pocos cambios después hechas por él o sus sucesores, por razones de claridad o la gramática. Por lo tanto, el material introductorio publicado en el libro moderno de Mormón no es considerado como escritura, y ha sido modificado de vez en cuando. Un representante de Asuntos Públicos de la Iglesia señaló:
+
{{main|Book of Mormon textual changes}}
  
: He encontrado que más que los últimos 20 años una serie de cambios se han realizado en la introducción del Libro de Mormón - y que no se considera la escritura.{{ref|tuttle.1}}
+
Thus, introductory material published in the modern Book of Mormon is not regarded as scripture, and has been modified from time to time.  A representative from Church Public Affairs noted:
  
== ==
+
<blockquote>
{{designación nota}}
+
I have found that over that last 20 years a number of changes have been made in the introduction to the Book of Mormon - and that it is not consider[ed] scripture.<ref> Mark Tuttle, personal e-mail to Tyler Livingston (1 March 2007).</ref>
 
+
</blockquote>
#{{note|avant}}Gerry Avant, "Encyclopedia of Mormonism," ''LDS Church News'' (12 July 1991).
+
</onlyinclude>
#{{note|ludlow}}{{EoM1 |author=Daniel H. Ludlow|article=Preface|vol=1|start=lxii}}
+
{{notas finales}}
#{{note|matthews.48}}{{Ensign1|author=Robert J. Matthews|article=Using the New Bible Dictionary in the LDS Edition|date=June 1982|start=48}}{{link|url=http://www.lds.org/ensign/1982/06/using-the-new-bible-dictionary-in-the-lds-edition?lang=eng}}
 
#{{note|mcconkie.290}}{{DoR1 |start=290}}
 
#{{note|tuttle.1}} Mark Tuttle, personal e-mail to Tyler Livingston (1 March 2007).
 
  
{{Articles Footer 1}}
+
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
  
[[en:Mormonism and doctrine/Official Church publications]]
+
[[en:Question: Are some Mormon publications misrepresented as "official" publications of the Church?]]
[[fr:Official Church publications]]
+
[[pt:Pergunta: algumas publicações deturpado como publicações "oficiais" da Igreja?]]

Revisión actual del 19:20 3 ago 2018

Tabla de Contenidos

Pregunta: ¿Se tergiversan algunas publicaciones mormonas como publicaciones "oficiales" de la Iglesia?

  NEEDS TRANSLATION  


Some tend to misrepresent whether or not a publication is officially sanctioned by the Church in order to suit their agenda.

  • It is claimed that some publications are official Church publications when in reality they are not.
    • D. Michael Quinn claimed that the Encyclopedia of Mormonism "was an official product of the LDS Church."
  • It is claimed that some publications are not official Church publications when in reality they are.
    • Richard Abanes states in Becoming Gods that the book "Gospel Principles" contains a 1978 copyright by the Church, but the author states that it contains a disclaimer that indicates that it is not an official publication of the Church, and that "the views expressed herein are the responsibility of the author and do not represent the position of the Church."

The Encyclopedia of Mormonism was not an official production of the LDS Church

The author of Early Mormonism and the Magic World View wants to make the Encyclopedia of Mormonism an 'official' work, when the book, its editor, its authors, and publisher all assert that it is not. The Encyclopedia of Mormonism was not an official production of the LDS Church as the Church News noted:

The encyclopedia, according to its publisher and board of editors, is not an official publication of the Church. Daniel H. Ludlow, editor-in-chief, emphasized that the encyclopedia is not intended as a substitute for the scriptures, other official publications of the Church or doctrines as taught by the apostles and prophets.[1]

This is indicated in the introduction to the Encyclopedia:

Lest the role of the Encyclopedia be given more weight than it deserves, the editors make it clear that those who have written and edited have only tried to explain their understanding of Church history, doctrines, and procedures; their statements and opinions remain their own. The Encyclopedia of Mormonism is a joint product of Brigham Young University and Macmillan Publishing Company, and its contents do not necessarily represent the official position of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In no sense does the Encyclopedia have the force and authority of scripture.[2]

Gospel Principles is an official publication of the LDS Church

From the title page of Gospel Principles:

GOSPEL PRINCIPLES

Published by
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Salt Lake City, Utah 1979.

The next page:

Copyright (c) 1978 Corporation of the President
of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
All Rights Reserved
Printed in the United States of America.

We cannot find the disclaimer mentioned by the author in Becoming Gods about Gospel Principles not being an official publication.

Regarding the LDS Bible Dictionary, the Church has been explicit that it is not to be taken as a statement of revealed Church doctrine

Regarding the LDS Bible Dictionary, the Church has been explicit that it is not to be taken as a statement of revealed Church doctrine. The introduction to the Bible Dictionary includes the following statement:

[The Bible Dictionary] is not intended as an official or revealed endorsement by the Church of the doctrinal, historical, cultural, and other matters set forth.

Robert J. Matthews, who was part of the committee in the late 1970s to create the LDS editions of the scriptures, including the study aids, said:

The new Bible dictionary is not intended as a revealed treatment or official version of doctrinal, historical, cultural, chronological, and other matters found in the Bible.[3]

Elder Bruce R. McConkie had this to say regarding "the Joseph Smith Translation items, the chapter headings, Topical Guide, Bible Dictionary, footnotes, the Gazetteer, and the maps":

None of these are perfect; they do not of themselves determine doctrine; there have been and undoubtedly now are mistakes in them. Cross-references, for instance, do not establish and never were intended to prove that parallel passages so much as pertain to the same subject. They are aids and helps only.[4]

To summarize, entries in the Bible Dictionary are not part of the canon of scripture and are not binding upon anyone, save as they accurately reflect the contents of scripture or joint statements by the prophets, seers, and revelators.

Introductory material to the Book of Mormon is not regarded as scripture

The only part of the Book of Mormon regarded as scripture is the original text as published by Joseph Smith, Jr., with a few changes later made by him or his successors for reasons of clarity or grammar.

Artículo principal: Book of Mormon textual changes

Thus, introductory material published in the modern Book of Mormon is not regarded as scripture, and has been modified from time to time. A representative from Church Public Affairs noted:

I have found that over that last 20 years a number of changes have been made in the introduction to the Book of Mormon - and that it is not consider[ed] scripture.[5]

Notas

  1. Gerry Avant, "Encyclopedia of Mormonism," LDS Church News (12 July 1991).
  2. Daniel H. Ludlow, "Preface," in Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 4 vols., edited by Daniel H. Ludlow, (New York, Macmillan Publishing, 1992), 1:lxii. off-site (Inglés) off-site (Inglés)
  3. Robert J. Matthews, "Using the New Bible Dictionary in the LDS Edition," Ensign (June 1982), 48.
  4. Plantilla:DoR1
  5. Mark Tuttle, personal e-mail to Tyler Livingston (1 March 2007).