|
|
| (No se muestran 9 ediciones intermedias de 2 usuarios) |
| Línea 1: |
Línea 1: |
| − | {{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
| + | #REDIRECT [[El Libro de Mormón/Jerusalén vs Belén]] |
| − | {{Resource Title|Book of Mormon anachronisms: Jesus to be born "at Jerusalem"}}
| |
| − | == ==
| |
| − | {{Criticism label}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | Critics point out that [http://scriptures.lds.org/alma/7/10#10 Alma 7:10] says that Jesus would be born "at Jerusalem which is the land of our forefathers." Yet, every schoolchild knows that Jesus was born in ''Bethlehem''. They claim that this is a mistake, and evidence that Joseph Smith forged the Book of Mormon.
| |
| − | | |
| − | {{CriticalSources}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | == ==
| |
| − | {{Conclusion label}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | The town of Bethlehem ''is'' in the "land of Jerusalem." In fact, Bethlehem is only 5 miles south of Jerusalem: definitely "in the land," especially from the perspective of Alma, a continent away. Even locals considered Hebron, twenty five miles from Bethlehem, to be in the "land of Jerusalem.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Critics have not proven anything in raising this point, except perhaps another literary evidence for the Book of Mormon. While a forger would likely overlook this detail and include Bethlehem as the commonly-understood birthplace of Jesus, the ancient authors of the Book of Mormon use an authentic term to describe the Savior's birthplace—thereby providing another point of authenticity for the Book of Mormon.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == ==
| |
| − | {{Response label}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | This is an old criticism that has been dealt with at least as far back as 1882,{{ref|georeynolds}} but continues to pop up now and again.
| |
| − | | |
| − | BYU professor Daniel C. Peterson pointed out the absurdity of this argument:
| |
| − | | |
| − | :To suggest that Joseph Smith knew the precise location of Jesus' baptism by John ("in Bethabara, beyond Jordan" ([http://scriptures.lds.org/1_ne/10/9#9 1 Ne. 10:9]) but hadn't a clue about the famous town of Christ's birth is so improbable as to be ludicrous. Do the skeptics seriously mean to suggest that the Book of Mormon's Bible-drenched author (or authors) missed one of the most obvious facts about the most popular story in the Bible — something known to every child and Christmas caroler? Do they intend to say that a clever fraud who could write a book displaying so wide an array of subtly authentic Near Eastern and biblical cultural and literary traits as the Book of Mormon does was nonetheless so stupid as to claim, before a Bible-reading public, that Jesus was born in the city of Jerusalem? As one anti-Mormon author has pointed out, "Every schoolboy and schoolgirl knows Christ was born in Bethlehem." [Langfield, 53.] Exactly! It is virtually certain, therefore, that Alma 7:10 was foreign to Joseph Smith's preconceptions. "The land of Jerusalem" is not the sort of thing the Prophet would likely have invented, precisely for the same reason it bothers uninformed critics of the Book of Mormon.{{ref|peterson1}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | It is important to note what Alma's words were. He did not claim Jesus would be born ''in the city of Jerusalem,'' but "at Jerusalem which is the land of our forefathers."
| |
| − | | |
| − | Thus, the Book of Mormon makes a distinction here between a ''city'' and the ''land'' associated with a city. It does this elsewhere as well:
| |
| − | *the land ([http://scriptures.lds.org/alma/2/15#15 Alma 2:15]) and city([http://scriptures.lds.org/alma/6/1#1 Alma 6:1]) of Zarahemla;
| |
| − | *the land and city of Nephi ([http://scriptures.lds.org/alma/47/20#20 Alma 47:20]).
| |
| − | | |
| − | This is consistent with the usage of the ancient Middle East. El Amarna letter #287 reports that "a town of the land of Jerusalem, Bit-Lahmi [Bethlehem] by name, a town belonging to the king, has gone over to the side of the people of Keilah."{{ref|ensign1}} (One over-confident 19th century critic blithely assured his readers that "There is no such land. No part of Palestine bears the name of Jerusalem, except the city itself."{{ref|bachelor.1}} While this was perhaps true in the 19th century, it was not true anciently. A supposed "howler" turns into evidence for the text's antiquity.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Thus, the Book of Mormon gets it exactly right — the town of Bethlehem ''is'' in the "land of Jerusalem." In fact, Bethlehem is only 5 miles south of Jerusalem: definitely "in the land," especially from the perspective of Alma, a continent away. Even locals considered Hebron, twenty five miles from Bethlehem, to be in the "land of Jerusalem."
| |
| − | | |
| − | <videoflash>jiO5OLX95LE</videoflash>
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | =={{Endnotes label}}==
| |
| − | #{{note|georeynolds}} See George Reynolds, "Objections to the Book of Mormon," ''Millennial Star'' 44/16 (17 April 1882): 244–47. {{pdflink|url=http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/u?/MStar,5268}}
| |
| − | #{{note|peterson1}} {{revisited1|author=Daniel C. Peterson|article=Is the Book of Mormon True? Notes on the Debate|start=Chapter 6}} {{GL1|url=http://gospelink.com/library/doc?doc%5fid=264962}}
| |
| − | #{{note|ensign1}}James B. Pritchard, editor, ''Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament'', 3d ed. (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1969), 489, translation by W. F. Albright and George E. Mendenhall; cited by {{Ensign|author=D. Kelly Ogden|article=Why Does the Book of Mormon Say That Jesus Would Be Born at Jerusalem? (I Have a Question)|date=August 1984|start=51|end=52}}{{link|url=https://www.lds.org/ensign/1984/08/i-have-a-question?lang=eng}}
| |
| − | #{{note|bachelor.1}} {{CriticalWork:Bachelor:Mormonism Exposed|pages=13}}
| |
