Diferenças entre edições de "Pergunta: É a menção de "curelons" e "cumons", um livro do anacronismo Mórmon?"

(Criou a página com "{{fonte |título=Question: Is the mention of "cureloms" and "cumons" a Book of Mormon anachronism? |categoria= }} <onlyinclude> {{translate}} ==Question: Is the mention of "...")
 
Linha 17: Linha 17:
  
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 +
 
[[en:Question: Is the mention of "cureloms" and "cumons" a Book of Mormon anachronism?]]
 
[[en:Question: Is the mention of "cureloms" and "cumons" a Book of Mormon anachronism?]]
[[pt:Pergunta: É a menção de "curelons" e "cumons", um livro do anacronismo Mórmon?]]
 

Revisão das 15h34min de 5 de junho de 2017

Índice

  NEEDS TRANSLATION  


Question: Is the mention of "cureloms" and "cumons" a Book of Mormon anachronism?

These names are untranslated Jaredite terms

These names are untranslated Jaredite terms. A variety of potential animals have been suggested, such as llamas, alpacas, mastodons, or other Pleistocene mammals.

Without more information, one cannot count this as a strike against the Book of Mormon

Interestingly, were he fabricating the Book of Mormon, this was an opportunity for Joseph Smith to let his imagination run wild, and yet no descriptions of these strange beasts (which he goes to the trouble to name, in the forgery model of Book of Mormon production) are provided.[1]

Notas

  1. For a discussion, see John L. Sorenson, An Ancient American Setting for the Book of Mormon (Salt Lake City, Utah : Deseret Book Co. ; Provo, Utah : Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1996 [1985]), 298. ISBN 1573451576. GospeLink (requires subscrip.)