Diferenças entre edições de "Pergunta: Será que Joseph Fielding Smith remover a conta de 1832 de Joseph Smith A Primeira Visão de seu original carta-livro e escondê-lo em seu cofre?"

(Criou a página com "{{fonte |título=Pergunta: Será que Joseph Fielding Smith remover a conta de 1832 de Joseph Smith A Primeira Visão de seu original carta-livro e escondê-lo em seu cofre?...")
 
Linha 1: Linha 1:
 
{{fonte
 
{{fonte
|título=Pergunta: Será que Joseph Fielding Smith remover a conta de 1832 de Joseph Smith A Primeira Visão de seu original carta-livro e escondê-lo em seu cofre?
+
|título=Question: Did Joseph Fielding Smith remove the 1832 account of Joseph Smith's First Vision from its original letterbook and hide it in his safe?
 
|categoria=Livro de Mórmon
 
|categoria=Livro de Mórmon
 
}}
 
}}
 
<onlyinclude>
 
<onlyinclude>
==Pergunta: Será que Joseph Fielding Smith remover a conta de 1832 de Joseph Smith A Primeira Visão de seu original carta-livro e escondê-lo em seu cofre?==
+
{{translate}}
===Não se sabe que removeu as páginas do livro ou por quê, nem se sabe quando ou por que eles foram restaurados para o livro===
+
==Question: Did Joseph Fielding Smith remove the 1832 account of Joseph Smith's First Vision from its original letterbook and hide it in his safe?==
 +
===It is not known who removed the pages from the book or why, nor is it known when or why they were restored to the book===
  
De [http://josephsmithpapers.org/paperSummary/history-circa-summer-1832#!/paperSummary/history-circa-summer-1832&p=3 ''História, Verão circa 1832''] no site do '' Joseph Smith Papers '' (clique na guia Fonte Notes):
+
From [http://josephsmithpapers.org/paperSummary/history-circa-summer-1832#!/paperSummary/history-circa-summer-1832&p=3 ''History, circa Summer 1832''] on the ''Joseph Smith Papers'' site (click the Source Notes tab):
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
Fotocópia e microfilme imagens do livro, assim como uma inspeção do trabalho de conservação agora presente no volume, indicam que o bloco de texto separado da ligação em algum ponto. Além disso, as três folhas iniciais contendo a história foram excisadas a partir do volume. Os oito folhas inscritos na parte de trás do volume pode ter sido cortada para fora ao mesmo tempo. Evidência do manuscrito sugere que essas excisões ocorreu em meados do século XX. Uma lágrima na terceira folha, que evidentemente ocorreu durante sua excisão, provavelmente foi emendado no momento. Este rasgo foi remendado com fita adesiva clara, que foi inventado em 1930. As três folhas da história certamente tinha sido removido por volta de 1965, quando foram descritas como "cortar", apesar de terem sido arquivados juntamente com o letterbook. O tamanho e papel balanço dos três folhas excisadas coincidir com os de outros folhas no livro. Além disso, o corte e marcas de lágrimas, bem como as inscrições nas calhas dos três folhas excisadas, coincidem com os dos restantes stubs folha, confirmando seu local original no livro. As três folhas foram posteriormente restaurado para o volume, aparentemente, na década de 1990. Essa restauração foi provavelmente parte de um esforço de conservação maior que teve lugar, em que todo o volume foi rebote, incluindo a ligação do índice anteriormente solta de letras. O primeiro encontro, que contém a história, foi ligeiramente aparado em conexão com este trabalho de conservação. Os shows de volume marcado escurecimento, fragilidade, e desgaste. Ele está listado em Nauvoo, Illinois, e no início de Salt Lake City, Utah, inventários feitos pelo Escritório do Historiador da Igreja, bem como no registo 1973 da Coleção JS, indicando custódia institucional contínua. <ref>[http://josephsmithpapers.org/paperSummary/history-circa-summer-1832#!/paperSummary/history-circa-summer-1832&p=3 History, circa Summer 1832], ''The Joseph Smith Papers''.</ref>
+
Photocopy and microfilm images of the book, as well as an inspection of the conservation work now present in the volume, indicate that the text block separated from the binding at some point. Also, the initial three leaves containing the history were excised from the volume. The eight inscribed leaves in the back of the volume may have been cut out at the same time. Manuscript evidence suggests that these excisions took place in the mid-twentieth century. A tear on the third leaf, which evidently occurred during its excision, was probably mended at the time. This tear was mended with clear cellophane tape, which was invented in 1930. The three leaves of the history certainly had been removed by 1965, when they were described as “cut out,” although they were archived together with the letterbook. The size and paper stock of the three excised leaves match those of the other leaves in the book. Also, the cut and tear marks, as well as the inscriptions in the gutters of the three excised leaves, match those of the remaining leaf stubs, confirming their original location in the book. The three leaves were later restored to the volume, apparently in the 1990s. This restoration was probably part of a larger conservation effort that took place, in which the entire volume was rebound, including binding the formerly loose index of letters. The first gathering, which contains the history, was slightly trimmed in connection with this conservation work. The volume shows marked browning, brittleness, and wear. It is listed in Nauvoo, Illinois, and early Salt Lake City, Utah, inventories made by the Church Historian’s Office, as well as in the 1973 register of the JS Collection, indicating continuous institutional custody. <ref>[http://josephsmithpapers.org/paperSummary/history-circa-summer-1832#!/paperSummary/history-circa-summer-1832&p=3 History, circa Summer 1832], ''The Joseph Smith Papers''.</ref>
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
Aqui é a referência para o documento por Jerald e Sandra Tanner, conforme publicado no seu livro ''Mormonism: Shadow or Reality?'':
+
Here is the reference to the document by Jerald and Sandra Tanner, as published in their book ''Mormonism: Shadow or Reality?'':
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
Contas "estranho"
+
"Strange" Accounts
  
Durante anos, os líderes mórmons mantida publicamente que Joseph Smith disse apenas uma história a respeito da Primeira Visão. Preston Nibley declarou: ". Joseph Smith viveu um pouco mais de 24 anos após esta primeira visão Durante este tempo, ele disse, mas uma história --..." (Joseph Smith, o Profeta, 1944, página 30)
+
For years the Mormon leaders publicly maintained that Joseph Smith told only one story concerning the First Vision. Preston Nibley declared: "Joseph Smith lived a little more than twenty-four years after this first vision. During this time he told but one story--..." (Joseph Smith the Prophet, 1944, page 30)
 
+
Ao mesmo tempo em que Preston Nibley fez esta declaração aos líderes mórmons foram suprimir pelo menos duas contas da Primeira Visão que foram escritas antes da conta que Joseph Smith publicou no Times and Seasons. Levi Edgar Young, que era o chefe dos sete Presidentes dos Setenta na Igreja Mórmon, disse a LaMar Petersen que ele havia examinado uma conta de "estranho" da Primeira Visão e foi dito para não revelar o que ele continha. O que se segue é a partir de notas por LaMar Petersen de uma entrevista com Levi Edgar Jovem que foi realizada em Feb.3 de 1953:
+
At the very time that Preston Nibley made this statement the Mormon leaders were suppressing at least two accounts of the First Vision which were written prior to the account which Joseph Smith published in the Times and Seasons. Levi Edgar Young, who was the head of the Seven Presidents of Seventies in the Mormon Church, told LaMar Petersen that he had examined a "strange" account of the First Vision and was told not to reveal what it contained. The following is from notes by LaMar Petersen of an interview with Levi Edgar Young which was held on Feb.3, 1953:
  
"Foi apresentada uma lista de 5 perguntas. Bro. Jovem indicou alguma surpresa com a natureza das questões, mas disse que aprovou efusivamente deles sendo solicitado. Disse que eles eram importantes, fundamentais, estavam sendo feitas mais por membros da Igreja, e deve ser solicitado. Disse a Igreja deve ter um comitê disponível onde poderia ser obtido respostas a essas perguntas. ele parou indo para baixo com suas próprias perguntas para o irmão Joseph Fielding (Smith) porque ele foi rido e adiar.
+
"A list of 5 questions was presented. Bro. Young indicated some surprise at the nature of the questions but said he heartily approved of them being asked. Said they were important, fundamental, were being asked more by members of the Church, and should be asked. Said the Church should have a committee available where answers to such questions could be obtained. He has quit going down with his own questions to Brother Joseph Fielding (Smith) because he was laughed at and put off.
  
"Sua curiosidade estava animado quando lê em Roberts 'referência Doc. História de' documentos a partir do qual estes escritos foram compilados. 'Enviada para vê-los. Disse-nos para obter maior permissão. Obtido essa permissão. Examinaram os documentos. Escrito, pensou ele, cerca de 1837 ou 1838. Foi-me dito para não copiar ou dizer o que elas continham. Disse que era uma conta de "estranho" do primeira Visão. Foi colocado de volta no vault. permanece inutilizada, desconhecido ". <ref>Jerald and Sandra Tanner, "Chapter 8: The First Vision," Mormonism--Shadow or Reality?</ref>
+
"His curiosity was excited when reading in Roberts' Doc. History reference to 'documents from which these writings were compiled.' Asked to see them. Told to get higher permission. Obtained that permission. Examined the documents. Written, he thought, about 1837 or 1838. Was told not to copy or tell what they contained. Said it was a 'strange' account of the First Vision. Was put back in vault. Remains unused, unknown." <ref>Jerald and Sandra Tanner, "Chapter 8: The First Vision," Mormonism--Shadow or Reality?</ref>
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
 
</onlyinclude>
 
</onlyinclude>

Revisão das 22h34min de 6 de janeiro de 2016

Índice

  NEEDS TRANSLATION  


Question: Did Joseph Fielding Smith remove the 1832 account of Joseph Smith's First Vision from its original letterbook and hide it in his safe?

It is not known who removed the pages from the book or why, nor is it known when or why they were restored to the book

From History, circa Summer 1832 on the Joseph Smith Papers site (click the Source Notes tab):

Photocopy and microfilm images of the book, as well as an inspection of the conservation work now present in the volume, indicate that the text block separated from the binding at some point. Also, the initial three leaves containing the history were excised from the volume. The eight inscribed leaves in the back of the volume may have been cut out at the same time. Manuscript evidence suggests that these excisions took place in the mid-twentieth century. A tear on the third leaf, which evidently occurred during its excision, was probably mended at the time. This tear was mended with clear cellophane tape, which was invented in 1930. The three leaves of the history certainly had been removed by 1965, when they were described as “cut out,” although they were archived together with the letterbook. The size and paper stock of the three excised leaves match those of the other leaves in the book. Also, the cut and tear marks, as well as the inscriptions in the gutters of the three excised leaves, match those of the remaining leaf stubs, confirming their original location in the book. The three leaves were later restored to the volume, apparently in the 1990s. This restoration was probably part of a larger conservation effort that took place, in which the entire volume was rebound, including binding the formerly loose index of letters. The first gathering, which contains the history, was slightly trimmed in connection with this conservation work. The volume shows marked browning, brittleness, and wear. It is listed in Nauvoo, Illinois, and early Salt Lake City, Utah, inventories made by the Church Historian’s Office, as well as in the 1973 register of the JS Collection, indicating continuous institutional custody. [1]

Here is the reference to the document by Jerald and Sandra Tanner, as published in their book Mormonism: Shadow or Reality?:

"Strange" Accounts

For years the Mormon leaders publicly maintained that Joseph Smith told only one story concerning the First Vision. Preston Nibley declared: "Joseph Smith lived a little more than twenty-four years after this first vision. During this time he told but one story--..." (Joseph Smith the Prophet, 1944, page 30)

At the very time that Preston Nibley made this statement the Mormon leaders were suppressing at least two accounts of the First Vision which were written prior to the account which Joseph Smith published in the Times and Seasons. Levi Edgar Young, who was the head of the Seven Presidents of Seventies in the Mormon Church, told LaMar Petersen that he had examined a "strange" account of the First Vision and was told not to reveal what it contained. The following is from notes by LaMar Petersen of an interview with Levi Edgar Young which was held on Feb.3, 1953:

"A list of 5 questions was presented. Bro. Young indicated some surprise at the nature of the questions but said he heartily approved of them being asked. Said they were important, fundamental, were being asked more by members of the Church, and should be asked. Said the Church should have a committee available where answers to such questions could be obtained. He has quit going down with his own questions to Brother Joseph Fielding (Smith) because he was laughed at and put off.

"His curiosity was excited when reading in Roberts' Doc. History reference to 'documents from which these writings were compiled.' Asked to see them. Told to get higher permission. Obtained that permission. Examined the documents. Written, he thought, about 1837 or 1838. Was told not to copy or tell what they contained. Said it was a 'strange' account of the First Vision. Was put back in vault. Remains unused, unknown." [2]

Notas

  1. History, circa Summer 1832, The Joseph Smith Papers.
  2. Jerald and Sandra Tanner, "Chapter 8: The First Vision," Mormonism--Shadow or Reality?