Diferenças entre edições de "O Livro de Abraão/Acusações de plágio/Thomas Dick"

(m)
 
(m)
Linha 1: Linha 1:
−
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
+
{{artigos FairMormon direitos autorais}}
−
{{Resource Title|Did Joseph Smith plagiarize Thomas Dick's book <em>The Philosophy of a Future State</em>?}}
+
{{título do recurso|Did Joseph Smith plagiarize Thomas Dick's book <em>The Philosophy of a Future State</em>?}}
 +
{{translate}}
 
<onlyinclude>
 
<onlyinclude>
 
== ==
 
== ==
−
{{Criticism label}}
+
{{etiqueta pergunta}}
  
 
It is claimed that Joseph Smith's theology as described in the Book of Abraham was influenced by Thomas Dick's book ''The Philosophy of a Future State''.
 
It is claimed that Joseph Smith's theology as described in the Book of Abraham was influenced by Thomas Dick's book ''The Philosophy of a Future State''.
−
 
−
<noinclude>{{CriticalSources}}</noinclude>
 
  
 
== ==
 
== ==
−
{{Conclusion label}}
+
{{etiqueta conclusão}}
  
 
Many of the ideas promoted by Thomas Dick were common Protestant beliefs and were therefore available without having to read Dick’s work. Joseph Smith never made any public or written statements indicating that he was aware of or that he had ever read Dick’s book. The only evidence that even suggests the possibility is circumstantial and is based upon the appearance of several passages from ''A Philosophy of a Future State'' in the ''Latter Day Saints’ Messenger and Advocate''. More importantly, Joseph Smith rejected or contradicted many of the ideas put forth by Dick in ''A Philosophy of a Future State''. It is therefore unlikely, contrary to Brodie’s speculation, that Joseph had been “recently reading” Dick’s work and that it made a “lasting impression” upon the Prophet.<ref>{{NoMa'am0}}</ref><ref>Jones, pp. 94-6.</ref>
 
Many of the ideas promoted by Thomas Dick were common Protestant beliefs and were therefore available without having to read Dick’s work. Joseph Smith never made any public or written statements indicating that he was aware of or that he had ever read Dick’s book. The only evidence that even suggests the possibility is circumstantial and is based upon the appearance of several passages from ''A Philosophy of a Future State'' in the ''Latter Day Saints’ Messenger and Advocate''. More importantly, Joseph Smith rejected or contradicted many of the ideas put forth by Dick in ''A Philosophy of a Future State''. It is therefore unlikely, contrary to Brodie’s speculation, that Joseph had been “recently reading” Dick’s work and that it made a “lasting impression” upon the Prophet.<ref>{{NoMa'am0}}</ref><ref>Jones, pp. 94-6.</ref>
  
 
== ==
 
== ==
−
{{Response label}}
+
{{etiqueta resposta}}
  
 
This criticism was advanced by Fawn Brodie, who suggested that Joseph Smith developed the theology described in the Book of Abraham by reading Thomas Dick’s ''The Philosophy of a Future State''. An excerpt from Dick’s work was published by Oliver Cowdery in the ''Latter Day Saints’ Messenger and Advocate'' in December 1836,<ref>{{MAfairwiki | author=Oliver Cowdery (editor) | article=ON THE ABSURDITY OF SUPPOSING THAT THE THINKING PRINCIPLE IN MAN WILL EVER BE ANNIHILATED |vol=3|num=3|date=December 1836|start=423|end=425 }} (An extract from "Thomas Dick's Philosophy of a Future State.") It should be noted that the November 1836 date given for this article given by Brodie in ''No Man Knows My History'' on page 171 is incorrect.</ref> therefore one could assume that Joseph had access to the book in the 1835-1836 timeframe during which the Book of Abraham was being produced. Dick's book was also in the possession of the Prophet by 1844, at which time he donated his copy to the Nauvoo Library and Literary Institute. <ref>Kenneth W. Godfrey, "A Note on the Nauvoo Library and Literary Institute," ''BYU Studies'' 14, no. 3 (1974) {{link|url=http://byustudies.byu.edu/PDFLibrary/14.3Godfrey.pdf}}</ref>
 
This criticism was advanced by Fawn Brodie, who suggested that Joseph Smith developed the theology described in the Book of Abraham by reading Thomas Dick’s ''The Philosophy of a Future State''. An excerpt from Dick’s work was published by Oliver Cowdery in the ''Latter Day Saints’ Messenger and Advocate'' in December 1836,<ref>{{MAfairwiki | author=Oliver Cowdery (editor) | article=ON THE ABSURDITY OF SUPPOSING THAT THE THINKING PRINCIPLE IN MAN WILL EVER BE ANNIHILATED |vol=3|num=3|date=December 1836|start=423|end=425 }} (An extract from "Thomas Dick's Philosophy of a Future State.") It should be noted that the November 1836 date given for this article given by Brodie in ''No Man Knows My History'' on page 171 is incorrect.</ref> therefore one could assume that Joseph had access to the book in the 1835-1836 timeframe during which the Book of Abraham was being produced. Dick's book was also in the possession of the Prophet by 1844, at which time he donated his copy to the Nauvoo Library and Literary Institute. <ref>Kenneth W. Godfrey, "A Note on the Nauvoo Library and Literary Institute," ''BYU Studies'' 14, no. 3 (1974) {{link|url=http://byustudies.byu.edu/PDFLibrary/14.3Godfrey.pdf}}</ref>
Linha 52: Linha 51:
  
 
== ==
 
== ==
−
{{Endnotes label}}
+
{{etiqueta notas}}
  
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
 
</onlyinclude>
 
</onlyinclude>
−
 
−
{{FurtherReading}}
 
  
 
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
 
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}

Revisão das 19h00min de 5 de agosto de 2014

Índice

Did Joseph Smith plagiarize Thomas Dick's book The Philosophy of a Future State?

  NEEDS TRANSLATION  


Perguntas


It is claimed that Joseph Smith's theology as described in the Book of Abraham was influenced by Thomas Dick's book The Philosophy of a Future State.

Conclusão


Many of the ideas promoted by Thomas Dick were common Protestant beliefs and were therefore available without having to read Dick’s work. Joseph Smith never made any public or written statements indicating that he was aware of or that he had ever read Dick’s book. The only evidence that even suggests the possibility is circumstantial and is based upon the appearance of several passages from A Philosophy of a Future State in the Latter Day Saints’ Messenger and Advocate. More importantly, Joseph Smith rejected or contradicted many of the ideas put forth by Dick in A Philosophy of a Future State. It is therefore unlikely, contrary to Brodie’s speculation, that Joseph had been “recently reading” Dick’s work and that it made a “lasting impression” upon the Prophet.[1][2]

Perguntas e respostas detalhadas


This criticism was advanced by Fawn Brodie, who suggested that Joseph Smith developed the theology described in the Book of Abraham by reading Thomas Dick’s The Philosophy of a Future State. An excerpt from Dick’s work was published by Oliver Cowdery in the Latter Day Saints’ Messenger and Advocate in December 1836,[3] therefore one could assume that Joseph had access to the book in the 1835-1836 timeframe during which the Book of Abraham was being produced. Dick's book was also in the possession of the Prophet by 1844, at which time he donated his copy to the Nauvoo Library and Literary Institute. [4]

It is also known that two of Dick's books were available in the Manchester Library, [5] although none of the Smith family were actually members of the library and were unlikely to have had access to its resources.[6] Based upon this circumstantial evidence, Brodie not only assumes that the Prophet must have read the book, but that he incorporated Dick’s ideas into the Book of Abraham.

Thomas Dick was a Scottish born minister, writer, astronomer and philosopher, whose published works in the early 1800’s attempted to reconcile science with Christianity. Dick believed that "mind and matter" were the two basic principles of the universe.[7] Dick believed God was of "a spiritual uncompounded substance, having no visible form."[8] The reason for the existence of matter is to allow the mind to be able to focus on God through the observance of his creations.

According to Dick:

[F]or the Creator has ordained, as one part of their mental enjoyments, that they shall be furnished with the means of tracing the mode of his operations, and the designs they are intended to accomplish in the different departments of nature.[9]

The following is a comparison and contrast of several of the theological concepts of both Joseph Smith and Thomas Dick.

Concept Thomas Dick Joseph Smith
Creation None but that Eternal Mind which counts the number of the stars, which called them from nothing into existence, and arranged them in the respective stations...[10] Now, I ask all who hear me, why the learned men who are preaching salvation, say that God created the heavens and the earth out of nothing? The reason is, that they are unlearned in the things of God... [11]
Intelligences The Creator stands in no need of innumerable assemblages of worlds and of inferior ranks of intelligences, in order to secure or to augment his felicity. Innumerable ages before the universe was created, he existed alone, independent of every other being, and infinitely happy in the contemplation of his own eternal excellencies.[12] I dwell in the midst of them all; I now, therefore, have come down unto thee to declare unto thee the works which my hands have made, wherein my wisdom excelleth them all, for I rule in the heavens above, and in the earth beneath, in all wisdom and prudence, over all the intelligences thine eyes have seen from the beginning; I came down in the beginning in the midst of all the intelligences thou hast seen. Now the Lord had shown unto me, Abraham, the intelligences that were organized before the world was; and among all these there were many of the noble and great ones; (Abra. 3:21-22)
Nature of God a spiritual uncompounded substance, having no visible form.[13] God himself was once as we are now, and is an exalted man, and sits enthroned in yonder heavens![14]
Ability to comprehend God But the eternity, the omnipresence, and the omniscience of the Deity, are equally mysterious; for they are equally incomprehensible, and must for ever remain incomprehensible to all limited intelligences.[15] It is the first principle of the Gospel to know for a certainty the Character of God, and to know that we may converse with him as one man converses with another, and that he was once a man like us; yea, that God himself, the Father of us all, dwelt on an earth. [16]

Notas


  1. ↑ Hugh Nibley, No, Ma'am, That's Not History: A Brief Review of Mrs. Brodie's Reluctant Vindication of a Prophet She Seeks to Expose (Bookcraft: 1946). off-site
  2. ↑ Jones, pp. 94-6.
  3. ↑ Oliver Cowdery (editor), "ON THE ABSURDITY OF SUPPOSING THAT THE THINKING PRINCIPLE IN MAN WILL EVER BE ANNIHILATED," (December 1836) Latter Day Saints' Messenger and Advocate 3:423-425. (An extract from "Thomas Dick's Philosophy of a Future State.") It should be noted that the November 1836 date given for this article given by Brodie in No Man Knows My History on page 171 is incorrect.
  4. ↑ Kenneth W. Godfrey, "A Note on the Nauvoo Library and Literary Institute," BYU Studies 14, no. 3 (1974) off-site
  5. ↑ Robert Paul, "Joseph Smith and the Manchester (New York) Library," Brigham Young University Studies 22 no. 3 (1982), 333–356.
  6. ↑ John Brooke, The Refiner's Fire (Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 207.
  7. ↑ Edward T. Jones, The Theology of Thomas Dick and its Possible Relationship to that of Joseph Smith, Master's Thesis, 1969, p. 27.
  8. ↑ Thomas Dick, The Philosophy of a Future State (New York: R. Shoyer, 1831) p. 188.
  9. ↑ Dick, p. 212.
  10. ↑ Dick, p. 192.
  11. ↑ Joseph Fielding Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1977) p. 350.
  12. ↑ Dick, p. 52.
  13. ↑ Dick, p. 188.
  14. ↑ Smith, p. 345.
  15. ↑ Dick, p. 183.
  16. ↑ Smith, p. 345.
Obtida de "https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/respostas/index.php?title=O_Livro_de_Abraão/Acusações_de_plágio/Thomas_Dick&oldid=79603"