![FairMormon Logo](https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/2021_fair_logo_primary.png)
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
(→21: fix) |
(→21: expand) |
||
Linha 89: | Linha 89: | ||
====21==== | ====21==== | ||
|| | || | ||
− | *The | + | *Many proudly proclaimed their Israelite lineage. The Book of Mormon reiterates this lineage many times. |
− | + | || | |
− | + | *Why were they proclaiming their lineage? Could not ''everyone'' proclaim their lineage through Israel? | |
− | + | || | |
− | + | *{{s||Mosiah|25|13}} | |
+ | *{{s||Alma|10|2-3}} | ||
+ | *{{s|3|Nephi|5|20}} | ||
+ | *{{s||Mormon|8|13}} | ||
+ | *{{s||Alma|17|21}} | ||
+ | *{{s||Alma|56|3}} | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | ====22==== | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | *The author notes that "Book of Mormon readers are not told of a single Nephite or Lamanite who descended from anyone other than an Israelite," and that scholars attempt to mitigate this by claiming that others were adopted into the Abrahamic covenant or that the Nephite record is an ethnocentric "lineage history." | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | *Sorenson, ''An Ancient American Setting for the Book of Mormon'' (1985), 50–56; | ||
+ | *John L. Sorenson and Matthew Roper, “Before DNA,” ''Journal of Book of Mormon Studies'' 12, no. 1 (2003): 17–18; | ||
+ | *Whiting, “DNA” (2003), 25–28, 31, 33–34. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | ====22==== | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | *The author states that neither the Jaredites nor the "Amerisraelites" ever mention indigenous "others." | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | *No source provided. | ||
+ | {{EndTable}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Challenges from Prophetic Authority== | ||
+ | {{BeginClaimsTable}} | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | *Joseph Smith taught that the Book of Mormon recounts the origin of Modern Amerindians. | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | *No source provided. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | ====22==== | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | *The author claims that apologists' response to Joseph's statements are that "prophets are fallible" and that Joseph "expressed or authorized divergent opinions aoubt the Book of Mormon setting and peoples." | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | *No source provided. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | ====22==== | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | *Joseph stated that the Book of Mormon is a record of the forefathers of our western Tribes of Indians and that the Land of America is a promised land. | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | *Joseph Smith to N. C. Saxton, 4 January 1833, Joseph Smith Letter Book 1, p. 17 (the r in “tribes of Indians” is dotted like an i), Joseph Smith Collection, LDS Church Archives, Salt Lake City, available on Selected Collections from the Archives of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Provo: Brigham Young University Press, 2002), DVD 20; see also Dean C. Jessee, comp. and ed., The Personal Writings of Joseph Smith, 2nd ed. (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 2002), | ||
+ | 297. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | ====22==== | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | *The "white Lamanite" named Zelph. | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | *[[Zelph]] | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | *For surveys of the primary sources on Zelph, see Donald Q. Cannon, | ||
+ | “Zelph Revisited,” Regional Studies in Latter-day Saint History: Illinois, ed. H. Dean | ||
+ | Garrett (Provo: Brigham Young University, Department of Church History and | ||
+ | Doctrine, 1995), 97–111; Kenneth W. Godfrey, “The Zelph Story,” Paper GOD-89 | ||
+ | (Provo: FARMS, 1989); Godfrey, “The Zelph Story,” Brigham Young University Studies | ||
+ | 29, no. 2 (Spring 1989): 31–56; Godfrey, “What Is the Significance of Zelph in the | ||
+ | Study of Book of Mormon Geography?” Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 8, no. 2 | ||
+ | (1999), 70–79; Brent Lee Metcalfe, “A Documentary Analysis of the Zelph | ||
+ | Episode,” delivered at the 1989 Sunstone Symposium; Metcalfe, “Disinterring | ||
+ | Zelph,” forthcoming online at <www.mormonscripturestudies.com>. | ||
+ | Wilford Woodruff, Journal, [3 June] 1834, LDS Church Archives, Salt | ||
+ | Lake City; see also Susan Staker, ed., Waiting for World’s End: The Diaries of Wilford | ||
+ | Woodruff (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1993), 4. Woodruff’s journal was combined | ||
+ | with Heber C. Kimball’s to form the 3 June 1834 entry in the History of the | ||
+ | Church ([Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1978], 2:79–80). Like Woodruff, Kimball | ||
+ | also observed that “Brother Joseph had enquired of the Lord” about Zelph’s identity | ||
+ | “and it was made known in a vision” (Heber C. Kimball, “Extracts from H. C. | ||
+ | Kimball[’]s Journal,” Times and Seasons 6, no. 2 [1 February 1845]: 788). | ||
+ | Woodruff recounted Smith’s Zelph vision several times throughout his life. Ruben | ||
+ | McBride penned a similar eyewitness account—so similar that in some instances | ||
+ | his recollection of Smith’s language is identical to Woodruff’s (Reuben McBride, | ||
+ | Sr., Journal, 3 June 1834, pp. 3–4, LDS Church Archives, Salt Lake City). | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | ====23==== | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | *Joseph said that Moroni told him that "the Indians were the literal descendants of Abraham" and that they were "the former inhabitants of this continent." | ||
+ | || | ||
|| | || | ||
* | * | ||
{{EndTable}} | {{EndTable}} |
This is an index of claims made in this work with links to corresponding responses within the FAIRwiki. An effort has been made to provide the author's original sources where possible.
Predefinição:BeginClaimsTable |
||
||
||
|- |
||
||
||
|- |
||
||
If we grant that the global colonization hypothesis is the correct lineage history...the above hypothesis is indeed incorrect. To this point all we have shown is that the global colonization hypothesis appears falsified by current genetic evidence. But is the global colonization hypothesis the only hypothesis emerging from the Book of Mormon? This is the crux of the matter....if the above description of the lineage history in the Book of Mormon is oversimplified, then these genetic results demonstrate only that this oversimplified view does not appear correct. But Book of Mormon scholars have been writing about certain complicating factors for decades, so this conclusion about oversimplification really comes as no surprise. (emphasis added)
||
|- |
||
And behold, it is wisdom that this land should be kept as yet from the knowledge of other nations; for behold, many nations would overrun the land, that there would be no place for an inheritance. Wherefore, I, Lehi, have obtained a promise, that inasmuch as those whom the Lord God shall bring out of the land of Jerusalem shall keep his commandments, they shall prosper upon the face of this land; and they shall be kept from all other nations, that they may possess this land unto themselves . . . and there shall be none to molest them, nor to take away the land of their inheritance; and they shall dwell safely forever. 2 Nephi 1:8-9
||
||
|- |
||
||
||
|- |
||
||
|| |- |
||
||
||
|- |
||
||
||
|- |
||
|| ||
|- |
||
|| ||
|}
Predefinição:BeginClaimsTable ||
|| ||
|- |
||
|| ||
|- |
||
|| ||
297. |- |
||
||
||
“Zelph Revisited,” Regional Studies in Latter-day Saint History: Illinois, ed. H. Dean Garrett (Provo: Brigham Young University, Department of Church History and Doctrine, 1995), 97–111; Kenneth W. Godfrey, “The Zelph Story,” Paper GOD-89 (Provo: FARMS, 1989); Godfrey, “The Zelph Story,” Brigham Young University Studies 29, no. 2 (Spring 1989): 31–56; Godfrey, “What Is the Significance of Zelph in the Study of Book of Mormon Geography?” Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 8, no. 2 (1999), 70–79; Brent Lee Metcalfe, “A Documentary Analysis of the Zelph Episode,” delivered at the 1989 Sunstone Symposium; Metcalfe, “Disinterring Zelph,” forthcoming online at <www.mormonscripturestudies.com>. Wilford Woodruff, Journal, [3 June] 1834, LDS Church Archives, Salt Lake City; see also Susan Staker, ed., Waiting for World’s End: The Diaries of Wilford Woodruff (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1993), 4. Woodruff’s journal was combined with Heber C. Kimball’s to form the 3 June 1834 entry in the History of the Church ([Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1978], 2:79–80). Like Woodruff, Kimball also observed that “Brother Joseph had enquired of the Lord” about Zelph’s identity “and it was made known in a vision” (Heber C. Kimball, “Extracts from H. C. Kimball[’]s Journal,” Times and Seasons 6, no. 2 [1 February 1845]: 788). Woodruff recounted Smith’s Zelph vision several times throughout his life. Ruben McBride penned a similar eyewitness account—so similar that in some instances his recollection of Smith’s language is identical to Woodruff’s (Reuben McBride, Sr., Journal, 3 June 1834, pp. 3–4, LDS Church Archives, Salt Lake City). |- |
||
|| ||
|}
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now