FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Modèle:CriticalWork:Southerton:Losing:Repeat:Leaders : Différence entre versions
m (Created page with '* The author is determined to represent LDS leaders as either bumbling, ill-informed, manipulative, or overwhelmed. * The author never acknowledges that the LDS do not believe in…') |
m |
||
| Ligne 1 : | Ligne 1 : | ||
* The author is determined to represent LDS leaders as either bumbling, ill-informed, manipulative, or overwhelmed. | * The author is determined to represent LDS leaders as either bumbling, ill-informed, manipulative, or overwhelmed. | ||
| − | * The author never acknowledges that the LDS do not believe in [[ | + | * The author never acknowledges that the LDS do not believe in [[Fallibility of prophets|infallibility]] in their leaders. |
* The author finally admits on [[#205|p. 205]] that there is no official geography—why, then, does he bother to reiterate the views of various leaders as if this were some kind of problem? Since even he agrees there is [[Book_of_Mormon_geography/New_World#Is_there_an_.22official.22_or_revealed_geography.3F|no official geography]], what difference does it make if members and leaders are of differing views, or if they even change their minds? | * The author finally admits on [[#205|p. 205]] that there is no official geography—why, then, does he bother to reiterate the views of various leaders as if this were some kind of problem? Since even he agrees there is [[Book_of_Mormon_geography/New_World#Is_there_an_.22official.22_or_revealed_geography.3F|no official geography]], what difference does it make if members and leaders are of differing views, or if they even change their minds? | ||
* {{Repeat|#10-11|#38-39|#40|#41|#45|#137|#138|#140|#142|l1=10-11|l2=38-39|l3=40|l4=41|l5=45|l6=137|l7=138|l8=140|l9=142}} | * {{Repeat|#10-11|#38-39|#40|#41|#45|#137|#138|#140|#142|l1=10-11|l2=38-39|l3=40|l4=41|l5=45|l6=137|l7=138|l8=140|l9=142}} | ||
Version du 3 juillet 2009 à 21:44
- The author is determined to represent LDS leaders as either bumbling, ill-informed, manipulative, or overwhelmed.
- The author never acknowledges that the LDS do not believe in infallibility in their leaders.
- The author finally admits on p. 205 that there is no official geography—why, then, does he bother to reiterate the views of various leaders as if this were some kind of problem? Since even he agrees there is no official geography, what difference does it make if members and leaders are of differing views, or if they even change their minds?