Modèle:TheosisLinks : Différence entre versions

m
(Add link to Jeff Lindsay's web page on theosis)
Ligne 5 : Ligne 5 :
 
*{{BYUS1|author=Van Hale|article=The Doctrinal Impact of the King Follett Discourse|date=1978|vol=18|num=2|start=209}}{{pdflink|url=http://byustudies.byu.edu/Products/MoreInfoPage/MoreInfo.aspx?prodid=1136&type=7}}
 
*{{BYUS1|author=Van Hale|article=The Doctrinal Impact of the King Follett Discourse|date=1978|vol=18|num=2|start=209}}{{pdflink|url=http://byustudies.byu.edu/Products/MoreInfoPage/MoreInfo.aspx?prodid=1136&type=7}}
 
*{{BYUS1|author=Stan Larson|article=The King Follett Discourse: A Newly Amalgamated Text" |date=1978|vol=18|num=2|start=193}}{{pdflink|url=http://byustudies.byu.edu/Products/MoreInfoPage/MoreInfo.aspx?prodid=1501&type=7}}{{nb}}
 
*{{BYUS1|author=Stan Larson|article=The King Follett Discourse: A Newly Amalgamated Text" |date=1978|vol=18|num=2|start=193}}{{pdflink|url=http://byustudies.byu.edu/Products/MoreInfoPage/MoreInfo.aspx?prodid=1501&type=7}}{{nb}}
 +
*Jeff Lindsay, "The Divine Potential of Human Beings: The Latter-day Saint Perspective," ''JeffLindsay.com'' (accessed 30 March 2007){{link|url=http://www.jefflindsay.com/LDSFAQ/FQ_theosis.shtml}}
 
*{{Ensign1|author=Gerald N. Lund|article=Is President Lorenzo Snow's oft-repeated statement 'As man now is, God once was; as God now is, man may be'] accepted as official doctrine by the Church?|date=February 1982|start=38}}{{link|url=http://library.lds.org/library/lpext.dll/ArchMagazines/Ensign/1982.htm/ensign%20february%201982.htm/i%20have%20a%20question.htm?fn=document-frame.htm&f=templates&2.0#LPTOC2}}
 
*{{Ensign1|author=Gerald N. Lund|article=Is President Lorenzo Snow's oft-repeated statement 'As man now is, God once was; as God now is, man may be'] accepted as official doctrine by the Church?|date=February 1982|start=38}}{{link|url=http://library.lds.org/library/lpext.dll/ArchMagazines/Ensign/1982.htm/ensign%20february%201982.htm/i%20have%20a%20question.htm?fn=document-frame.htm&f=templates&2.0#LPTOC2}}
 
*{{EoM|author=Keith E. Norman|article=Deification, Early Christian|vol=1|start=369|end=370}}{{link|url=http://ldsfaq.byu.edu/emmain.asp?number=62}}
 
*{{EoM|author=Keith E. Norman|article=Deification, Early Christian|vol=1|start=369|end=370}}{{link|url=http://ldsfaq.byu.edu/emmain.asp?number=62}}
 
*{{FR-11-2-6}}
 
*{{FR-11-2-6}}
 
*Daniel C. Peterson and Stephen D. Ricks, "Comparing LDS Beliefs with First-Century Christianity" (Provo, Utah: FARMS, no date). {{link|url=http://farms.byu.edu/display.php?table=transcripts&id=93}}
 
*Daniel C. Peterson and Stephen D. Ricks, "Comparing LDS Beliefs with First-Century Christianity" (Provo, Utah: FARMS, no date). {{link|url=http://farms.byu.edu/display.php?table=transcripts&id=93}}

Version du 30 mars 2007 à 16:19

   
Template:TheosisLinks
Theosis and related links
  • Ernst W. Benz, "Imago Dei: Man in the Image of God," in Truman G. Madsen (editor), Reflections on Mormonism: Judaeo-Christian parallels : papers delivered at the Religious Studies Center symposium, Brigham Young University, March 10-11, 1978 (Provo, Utah: Religious Studies Center , Brigham Young University and Bookcraft, 1978), 215–216. ISBN 0884943585. Reprinted in Ernst Benz, "Imago dei: Man as the Image of God," FARMS Review 17/1 (2005): 223–254. off-site PDF link Note: Benz misunderstands some aspects of LDS doctrine, but his sketch of the relevance of theosis for Christianity in general, and Joseph Smith's implementation of it, is worthwhile.
  • Donald Q. Cannon, "The King Follett Discourse: Joseph Smith's Greatest Sermon in Historical Perspective," Brigham Young University Studies 18:2 (1978): 179. PDF link
  • Donald Q. Cannon, Larry E. Dahl, and John W. Welch, "The Restoration of Major Doctrines through Joseph Smith: The Godhead, Mankind, and the Creation," Ensign (January 1989): 27–33. off-site
  • Van Hale, "The Doctrinal Impact of the King Follett Discourse," Brigham Young University Studies 18:2 (1978): 209. PDF link
  • Stan Larson, "The King Follett Discourse: A Newly Amalgamated Text"," Brigham Young University Studies 18:2 (1978): 193. PDF link (Source importante)
  • Jeff Lindsay, "The Divine Potential of Human Beings: The Latter-day Saint Perspective," JeffLindsay.com (accessed 30 March 2007) off-site
  • Gerald N. Lund, "Is President Lorenzo Snow's oft-repeated statement 'As man now is, God once was; as God now is, man may be'] accepted as official doctrine by the Church?," Ensign (February 1982): 38. off-site
  • Keith E. Norman, "Deification, Early Christian," Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 4 vols., edited by Daniel H. Ludlow, (New York, Macmillan Publishing, 1992), 1:369–370. off-site off-site off-site
  • David L. Paulsen and R. Dennis Potter, "How Deep the Chasm? A Reply to Owen and Mosser's Review," FARMS Review of Books 11/2 (1999): 221–264. off-site PDF link
  • Daniel C. Peterson and Stephen D. Ricks, "Comparing LDS Beliefs with First-Century Christianity" (Provo, Utah: FARMS, no date). off-site