Modèle:FeaturedArticles : Différence entre versions

(mod)
m (Don't need interwiki links between templates)
 
(12 révisions intermédiaires par 2 utilisateurs non affichées)
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
 
{{editme|url=Template:FeaturedArticles|before=|after='''''Current Features'''''}}
 
{{editme|url=Template:FeaturedArticles|before=|after='''''Current Features'''''}}
*'''[[Mormonism and Wikipedia]]'''. FAIR regularly receives queries about specific LDS-themed Wikipedia articles with requests that we somehow "fix" them. Although some individual members of FAIR may choose to edit Wikipedia articles, FAIR as an organization does not. Controversial Wikipedia articles require constant maintenance and a significant amount of time. We prefer instead to respond to claims in the FAIR Wiki rather than fight the ongoing battle that LDS Wikipedia articles sometimes invite. From FAIR’s perspective, assertions made in LDS-themed Wikipedia articles are therefore treated just like any other critical (or, if one prefers, "anti-Mormon") work. FAIR examines and responds to two LDS-related Wikipedia articles in detail:
+
*'''Elder Holland's General Conference Talk (Oct. 4, 2009)'''
**[[Mormonism and Wikipedia/First Vision|'''A FAIR Analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"''']]
+
<blockquote>
**[[Mormonism and Wikipedia/Joseph Smith, Jr.|'''A FAIR Analysis of Wikipedia article "Joseph Smith, Jr."''']]
+
For 179 years this book has been examined and attacked, denied and deconstructed, targeted and torn apart like perhaps no other book in modern religious history—perhaps like no other book in any religious history. And still it stands. Failed theories about its origins have been born and parroted and have died—from Ethan Smith to Solomon Spaulding to deranged paranoid to cunning genius. None of these frankly pathetic answers for this book has ever withstood examination because ''there is no other answer'' than the one Joseph gave as its young unlearned translator. In this I stand with my own great-grandfather, who said simply enough, “No wicked man could write such a book as this; and no good man would write it, unless it were true and he were commanded of God to do so.”<br>
 
+
&mdash;Jeffrey R. Holland, [http://www.lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?hideNav=1&locale=0&sourceId=77ee56627ab94210VgnVCM100000176f620a____&vgnextoid=2354fccf2b7db010VgnVCM1000004d82620aRCRD “Safety for the Soul,] Ensign, Nov 2009, 88–90
*'''[[Website reviews|FAIR web site reviews.]]''' Many web sites critical of the Church are very obvious in their mission&mdash;to pull the foundation from members' faith. Some, however, are much more subtle in their approach. These sites are claimed to be operated by active and believing members of the Church. Their message, unfortunately, is not consistent with building or supporting faith. FAIR reviews one such site.
+
</blockquote>
**'''[[Website reviews/MormonThink|A FAIR Analysis of ''MormonThink.com'']]
+
*Elder Holland gave a powerful testimony about the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon. During the course of his talk he mentioned two secular Book of Mormon authorship theories. So who are Ethan Smith and Solomon Spalding? What is the best that critics have been able to come up with to explain away the origin of the Book of Mormon? Read the articles below to find out.
 
+
**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/View of the Hebrews|Book of Mormon Authorship theories&mdash;Ethan Smith and View of the Hebrews]]'''
*'''[[Censorship and revision of LDS history/Hiding the facts|Where has the Church hidden its historical facts?]]'''&mdash;Our critics frequently claim that the Church has hidden its true history. A commonly cited example is Joseph Smith's use of a seer stone to translate. We found that this fact was indeed "hidden"...in September 1974 ''Friend''! How about the Danites attacking non-Mormons in Missouri? Check out the July 1993 ''Friend''! We uncover some of the historical facts that the Church has "hidden" in plain sight.
+
**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Spalding manuscript|Book of Mormon Authorship theories&mdash;Solomon Spalding's manuscript]]'''<noinclude>
 
+
</noinclude>
*'''[[Moroni's visit/Siblings remained asleep|Why did Joseph's siblings remain asleep during Moroni's visit?]]'''&mdash;One of the oddest claims we have recently encountered is the claim that Joseph's siblings should have been awakened during Moroni's visit. There is even some Church art that shows Joseph alone in his bed as he is listening to Moroni. Yet, there are also portrayals on the official Church website and in the ''Ensign'' that clearly show Joseph's siblings asleep in bed during the angelic visit. Critics use the fact that Joseph's siblings were not awakened to try and prove that Joseph was only experiencing a dream or hallucination. FAIR examines this odd claim in detail.
 

Version actuelle datée du 6 juin 2017 à 14:30

   
Template:FeaturedArticles
Current Features
  • Elder Holland's General Conference Talk (Oct. 4, 2009)

For 179 years this book has been examined and attacked, denied and deconstructed, targeted and torn apart like perhaps no other book in modern religious history—perhaps like no other book in any religious history. And still it stands. Failed theories about its origins have been born and parroted and have died—from Ethan Smith to Solomon Spaulding to deranged paranoid to cunning genius. None of these frankly pathetic answers for this book has ever withstood examination because there is no other answer than the one Joseph gave as its young unlearned translator. In this I stand with my own great-grandfather, who said simply enough, “No wicked man could write such a book as this; and no good man would write it, unless it were true and he were commanded of God to do so.”
—Jeffrey R. Holland, “Safety for the Soul,” Ensign, Nov 2009, 88–90