Modèle:FeaturedArticles : Différence entre versions

(added)
m (Don't need interwiki links between templates)
 
(21 révisions intermédiaires par 2 utilisateurs non affichées)
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
 
{{editme|url=Template:FeaturedArticles|before=|after='''''Current Features'''''}}
 
{{editme|url=Template:FeaturedArticles|before=|after='''''Current Features'''''}}
*'''FAIR web site reviews.''' Many web sites critical of the Church are very obvious in their mission—to pull the foundation from members' faith. Some, however, are much more subtle in their approach. These sites are claimed to be operated by active and believing members of the Church. Their message, unfortunately, is not consistent with building or supporting faith. FAIR reviews one such site.
+
*'''Elder Holland's General Conference Talk (Oct. 4, 2009)'''
**'''[[Website reviews/MormonThink|MormonThink.com]]
+
<blockquote>
 
+
For 179 years this book has been examined and attacked, denied and deconstructed, targeted and torn apart like perhaps no other book in modern religious history—perhaps like no other book in any religious history. And still it stands. Failed theories about its origins have been born and parroted and have died—from Ethan Smith to Solomon Spaulding to deranged paranoid to cunning genius. None of these frankly pathetic answers for this book has ever withstood examination because ''there is no other answer'' than the one Joseph gave as its young unlearned translator. In this I stand with my own great-grandfather, who said simply enough, “No wicked man could write such a book as this; and no good man would write it, unless it were true and he were commanded of God to do so.”<br>
*'''[[Censorship and revision of LDS history/Hiding the facts|Where has the Church hidden its historical facts?]]'''&mdash;Our critics frequently claim that the Church has hidden its true history. A commonly cited example is Joseph Smith's use of a seer stone to translate. We found that this fact was indeed hidden...in September 1974 ''Friend''! How about the Danites attacking non-Mormons in Missouri? Check out the July 1993 ''Friend''! We uncover some of the historical facts that the Church has hidden in plain sight.
+
&mdash;Jeffrey R. Holland, [http://www.lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?hideNav=1&locale=0&sourceId=77ee56627ab94210VgnVCM100000176f620a____&vgnextoid=2354fccf2b7db010VgnVCM1000004d82620aRCRD “Safety for the Soul,”] Ensign, Nov 2009, 88–90
 
+
</blockquote>
*'''[[Moroni's visit/Siblings remained asleep|Why did Joseph's siblings remain asleep during Moroni's visit?]]'''&mdash;One of the oddest claims we have recently encountered is the claim that Joseph's siblings should have been awakened during Moroni's visit. There is even some Church art that shows Joseph alone in his bed as he is listening to Moroni. Critics use this to try and prove that Joseph was only experiencing a dream or hallucination. FAIR examines this odd claim in detail.
+
*Elder Holland gave a powerful testimony about the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon. During the course of his talk he mentioned two secular Book of Mormon authorship theories. So who are Ethan Smith and Solomon Spalding? What is the best that critics have been able to come up with to explain away the origin of the Book of Mormon? Read the articles below to find out.
 +
**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/View of the Hebrews|Book of Mormon Authorship theories&mdash;Ethan Smith and View of the Hebrews]]'''
 +
**'''[[Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Spalding manuscript|Book of Mormon Authorship theories&mdash;Solomon Spalding's manuscript]]'''<noinclude>
 +
</noinclude>

Version actuelle datée du 6 juin 2017 à 14:30

   
Template:FeaturedArticles
Current Features
  • Elder Holland's General Conference Talk (Oct. 4, 2009)

For 179 years this book has been examined and attacked, denied and deconstructed, targeted and torn apart like perhaps no other book in modern religious history—perhaps like no other book in any religious history. And still it stands. Failed theories about its origins have been born and parroted and have died—from Ethan Smith to Solomon Spaulding to deranged paranoid to cunning genius. None of these frankly pathetic answers for this book has ever withstood examination because there is no other answer than the one Joseph gave as its young unlearned translator. In this I stand with my own great-grandfather, who said simply enough, “No wicked man could write such a book as this; and no good man would write it, unless it were true and he were commanded of God to do so.”
—Jeffrey R. Holland, “Safety for the Soul,” Ensign, Nov 2009, 88–90