FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Mormonism and popular media/Dan Brown's next book and Mormonism
Issue
There was much speculation that the LDS Church would be featured in the sequel to the The DaVinci Code.
Response
On the dust-jacket of The DaVinci Code author Dan Brown provided a clue about the nature of his upcoming novel by cryptically spelling out the phrase "Is there no help for the widow's son?" This is a phrase that is learned in every Masonic lodge when an initiate becomes a Master Mason. This clue pointed to the fact that Brown's new book would focus on Freemasonry.
When a Google search is performed on the phrase "Is there no help for the widow's son?" there are several page returns for a talk which was given in 1974 by Reed C. Durham at a meeting of the Mormon History Association. Since Durham's presentation spoke of Joseph Smith Jr. and the institution of Freemasonry some people drew the conclusion that perhaps Dan Brown's new literary work would deal, in a substantial way, with Mormons as well as Masons and it might make a connection between the two organizations.
It turned out that Dan Brown did refer to Mormonism in his fictional book called The Lost Symbol. The material appears in two short paragraphs within the book. Brown mentioned Joseph Smith by name, once. He referred to the translation of the golden plates of the Book of Mormon, once--utilizing the term 'magic eyeglasses' and putting forward a doubting opinion with regard to the reality of the translation 'miracle'. In addition, he used the erroneous phrase "baptism of the dead" (instead of "for" the dead), once. In both places where Joseph Smith and his ideology are mentioned they are being compared to other religious figures and practices.
There are no connections forged in The Lost Symbol between Joseph Smith and the Masonic fraternity.
Conclusion
Speculation about Mormonism's role in Dan Brown's latest book turned out to be unfounded.