Criticism of Mormonism/Books/American Massacre/Chapter 14

Chapter 13

A FAIR Analysis of: Criticism of Mormonism/Books A work by author: Sally Denton

Chapter 15

Claims made in Chapter 14: "Mountain Meadows, March 23, 1877"

Page	Claim	Response	Author's sources
222	The author claims that a "Jack Mormon" is one "who is not devout but not apostate."	History unclear or in error: Denton's sloppy research appears again. In modern usage, a "Jack Mormon" may sometimes refer to a less-active or less-observant Latter-day Saint.[1] In the nineteenth century, however, a "Jack Mormon" was a non-Mormon who was nevertheless sympathetic or friendly to Mormons.[2]	No source given.
224	The "Mormon euphemism for blood-atoning murders" was to be "put away."		Klingensmith testimony, Brooks, Mountain Meadows Witness, 191. Lee, 339 Fielding, Tribune Reports, 109.
227	John D. Lee denied that Brigham Young ordered the massacre because he believed that Brigham "would protect him from harm."	Mind reading: author has no way of knowing this. Lee had the chance for immunity if he would turn evidence against Brigham: "both Orson F. Whitney and the New York Herald reported that Howard offered Lee a full pardon in exchange for evidence against Brigham Young."[3] That he never did so strongly suggests he had no such evidence.	Author's opinion.
228	Author's quote: Young fully realized that the Mountain Meadows Massacre would continue to plague him until someone was held accountable for the crime. In a calculated and mutually beneficial deal, Young and Howard came to terms. Young would make available all witnesses and evidence necessary for a conviction of Lee. In exchange, Howard would limit the testimony implicating Young, George Smith, and other church leaders in the affair, and drop charges against Dame. It was an extraordinary quid pro quo that neither side apparently committed to writing.	If it was never committed to writing, how does the author know about it?  Quotes another author's opinion as if it were fact: The author here again follows Bagley uncritically. Deal with Brigham Young for massacre prosecution?	Will Bagley, Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows (University of Oklahoma Press, 2002), 300. Salt Lake Tribune Reports published in Fielding, 207.
230	John D. Lee chose to be shot rather than beheaded as "a clear signal to the faithful that he rejected a spiritual need to atone for any sins."		No source provided.
233	Before he is executed, Lee makes a statement against Brigham Young, saying that "I do not agree with him. I believe he is leading the people astray..."	Internal contradiction: This quotation argues against the posthumous claims made in Lee's "confession," upon which Denton bases her case. If Lee was about to be executed, why would he only claim Brigham was leading the people astray—why would he write an expose of Brigham's complicity in the Massacre, and then not announce at his execution (or before) that Brigham was guilty of ordering the murders?	No source is provided for any of the lengthy quoted comments on page 233.