Church sources discussing issues with Joseph's 1826 South Bainbridge court appearance

Revision as of 23:48, 30 April 2024 by GregSmith (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Main Page}} <onlyinclude> == Church sources discussing issues with Joseph's 1826 South Bainbridge court appearance== {{HiddenFact|fact=In 1826, Joseph was brought up on cha...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Church sources discussing issues with Joseph's 1826 South Bainbridge court appearance

The fact: In 1826, Joseph was brought up on charges of being a "disorderly person" for using a stone to "see things"
Where it can be found: The Ensign

1994

Ensign

Highlights in the Prophet’s Life 20 Mar. 1826: Tried and acquitted on fanciful charge of being a “disorderly person,” South Bainbridge, Chenango County, New York. New York law defined a disorderly person as, among other things, a vagrant or a seeker of “lost goods.” The Prophet had been accused of both: the first charge was false and was made simply to cause trouble; Joseph’s use of a seer stone to see things that others could not see with the naked eye brought the second charge. Those who brought the charges were apparently concerned that Joseph might bilk his employer, Josiah Stowell, out of some money. Mr. Stowell’s testimony clearly said this was not so and that he trusted Joseph Smith.
—Anonymous, "Highlights in the Prophet’s Life," Ensign (Jun 1994): 24. off-site


Notes