Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Nauvoo Polygamy/Assumptions and presumptions

< Criticism of Mormonism‎ | Books‎ | Nauvoo Polygamy

Revision as of 19:37, 9 June 2017 by FairMormonBot (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-}}\n{{FAIRAnalysisHeader\n\|title=(.*)\n\|author=(.*)\n(.*)\n(.*)\n\|previous=(.*)\n\|next=(.*)\n(.*)\n}} +|T=\1\n|A=\2\n|<=\5\n|>=\6\n}}))

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Nauvoo Polygamy: Assumptions and presumptions



Familiar anti-Mormon arguments

Joseph's guilt is always assumed

Joseph is simply assumed to be guilty of any offense.

  • He is even "haunted by the suspicion, which followed him from place to place, that he crossed moral boundaries in his friendship with other women." (p. 28)
  • In Illinois Joseph "was still hunted by law officials for old offenses." (p. 34)
  • The author assumes that Joseph "went about courting" various women, despite the total lack of evidence that any "courtships" occurred. (p. 54)