Question: Why does "Nahom" constitute archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon?

Revision as of 08:39, 22 October 2014 by RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{FME-Source |title=Que=stion: Why does "Nahom" constitute archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon? |category=Book of Mormon/Archaeology }} <onlyinclude> ==Question: Wh...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Question: Why does "Nahom" constitute archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon?

Written Hebrew does not employ vowels, therefore, Book of Mormon "Nahom" is NHM in Hebrew

The Book of Mormon name "Nahom" becomes NHM when written in Hebrew.

Three altar inscriptions have been discovered containing the name "NHM" as a tribal name and dating from the seventh to sixth centuries BC

Three altar inscriptions have been discovered containing the name "NHM" as a tribal name and dating from the seventh to sixth centuries BC. This is roughly the time period when Lehi’s family was traveling though the same area.

  • How does the Book of Mormon name "Nahom" correlate with the Old World?
  • Is archaeological evidence of Nahom simply, as one critical website claims, representative of "the willingness of LDS scholars to look anywhere in their despair to find a shred of validation for their erroneous beliefs?" [1]

These altars are located in the exact place where the spice route makes an eastward turn to cross the Arabian desert

The spice route proceed southward from Jerusalem and then turns toward the east at the place where the NHM inscriptions were found. Lehi's group proceeded southward and then made an "eastward turn" at the "place called Nahom."

The name NHM is associated with a burial site and mourning

Nephi indicated that their group had reached a "place called Nahom," indicating that the site was already named. Ismael was buried there, and his daughters mourned him there.


Notes

  1. MormonThink.com page "Book of Mormon Problems".