FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Biblical/Quoting Malachi
< Book of Mormon | Anachronisms | Biblical
Revision as of 23:54, 29 December 2014 by RogerNicholson (talk | contribs)
- REDIRECTTemplate:Test3
Contents
How can text from Malachi be present in the Book of Mormon?
Questions
It is claimed that the Book of Mormon cannot be an ancient work because it quotes Malachi hundreds of years before Malachi was written (i.e, they claim that Malachi 4:1 is quoted in 1 Nephi 22꞉15).
Answer
If Joseph was a fraud, why would he plagiarize the one text—the King James Bible—which his readers would be sure to know, and sure to react negatively if they noticed it? The Book of Mormon contains much original material—Joseph didn't "need" to use the KJV; he is obviously capable of producing original material.
Detailed Analysis
See also: Bible passages in the Book of Mormon
Summary: What does the inclusion of KJV text in the Book of Mormon tell us?Alleged KJV translation errors in the Book of Mormon Why do portions of Book of Mormon and KJV match so closely?
Summary: Are the King James passages in the Book of Mormon evidence of plagiarism?KJV italicized text in the Book of Mormon
Summary: Many changes in the Book of Mormon occur in the KJV italicized text. What is that text for? Did Joseph focus on it during the translation?Isaiah and the Book of Mormon New Testament text Quoting Malachi Greek words: alpha and omega? The Book of Mormon claims to be a "translation." Therefore, the language used is that of Joseph Smith. Joseph could choose to render similar (or identical) material using King James Bible language if that adequately represented the text's intent.
The translation language may resemble Malachi, but the work is not attributed to Malachi. Only if we presume that the Book of Mormon is a fraud at the outset is this proof of anything. If we assume that it is a translation, then the use of Bible language tells us merely that Joseph used biblical language.
Joseph used entire chapters (e.g., 3 Nephi 12-14 based on biblical texts that he did not claim were quotations from original texts (even Malachi is treated this way by Jesus in 3 Nephi 24-25. If these are not a problem, then a resemblance to biblical language elsewhere is not either, since that is simply how Joseph translated.
To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, click here
Notes