Christensen: "Runnells shifts the argument regarding the First Vision from 'absolutely no record of' to...'the first vision was unknown to the Saints and the world before 1832'"

Revision as of 09:20, 9 October 2014 by RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{FME-Source |title=Christensen: "Runnells claims that 'there is absolutely no record of a First Vision prior to 1832'" |category=First Vision }} <onlyinclude> ==Christensen:...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Christensen: "Runnells claims that 'there is absolutely no record of a First Vision prior to 1832'"

Kevin Christensen:

On page 22 of his Letter, Runnells claims that “there is absolutely no record of a First Vision prior to 1832.”44 The FairMormon website response points out an article in the Palmyra Reflector from 1831 that indicates discussion of Joseph’s vision as early as November 1830. They also point to the allusion in D&C 20, which dates to April 1830. Notice that in his response to FairMormon, Runnells shifts the argument regarding the First Vision from “absolutely no record” to “this actually confirms the point I’m making in that the first vision was unknown to the Saints and the world before 1832. In fact, most of the Saints were unaware of a first vision until it was published in 1842.” But of course, that was not the point he was making. “Absolutely no record” is the point he was making. His response swaps in a very different claim, one much easier to defend.[1]


Notes

  1. Kevin Christensen, "Eye of the Beholder, Law of the Harvest: Observations on the Inevitable Consequences of the Different Investigative Approaches of Jeremy Runnells and Jeff Lindsay," Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture 10:175-238 (2014).