Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Becoming Gods/Chapter 10

< Criticism of Mormonism‎ | Books‎ | Becoming Gods

Revision as of 22:26, 23 May 2010 by GregSmithBot (talk | contribs) (GLSBot: Adding footers to all articles)

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3


A FAIR Analysis of:
Becoming Gods: A Closer Look at 21st-Century Mormonism
A work by author: Richard Abanes

Claims made in "Chapter 10: The 'Christian' Question"

255, 434n15

Claim
LDS leaders spent decades denouncing mainstream Christianity.

Author's source(s)

Response


256

Claim
The Book of Mormon teaches that there are only two churches: 1) the false church of the devil and 2) the true church of the Lamb.

Author's source(s)

Response


257

Claim
The "ongoing condemnation of Christianity" is "built into the very core of Mormonism as a central tenet."

Author's source(s)

  • Author's opinion

Response


262, 440n46

Claim
The "Mormon Jesus" is one of three gods overseeing this planet.

Author's source(s)

  • Source not specified.

Response


262, 440n46

Claim
The "Mormon Jesus" is the literal brother of Lucifer.

Author's source(s)

  • No source specified.

Response


262, 440n46

Claim
The "Mormon Jesus" atoned only for Adam's transgression, providing us with the opportunity to obtain "eternal life" by our own efforts.

Author's source(s)

  • Source not specified.

Response


262, 440n46

Claim
The "Mormon Jesus" provides no salvation without accepting Joseph Smith as a prophet of God.

Author's source(s)

  • Source not specified.

Response


268

Claim
The Bible does not mention a total apostasy.

Author's source(s)

Response


273

Claim
Baptism for the dead is unbiblical.

Author's source(s)

  • No source given.

Response


274-276

Claim
The need for the Aaronic priesthood ceased and was replaced by a new one that is held by all believers.

Author's source(s)

  • Hebrews 7-10

Response


276-279

Claim
The Melchizedek priesthood was never a literal order of priests. It belonged only to Melchizedek and Christ.

Author's source(s)

  • Hebrews 7꞉24
  • D. Guthrie and J.A. Motyer, eds., The Eerdman's Bible Commentary, p. 1241.

Response