Book of Mormon anachronisms/Temple in New World

< Book of Mormon anachronisms

Revision as of 02:37, 23 October 2005 by GregSmith (talk | contribs) (Printed material)

This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.

Criticism

Critics attack the presence of an Israelite temple built by the Nephites. They do so on one or more of the following grounds:

  • they claim that Israelites considered the Jerusalem temple the sole legitimate site of worship, and so would not have reproduced it.
  • they claim that the Nephite population would have been too small to match the work required to built a temple "like unto Solomon's temple" (2 Nephi 5:16).

Source(s) of the Criticism

No temple besides Jerusalem:

Not enough people:

  • John Ankerberg and John Weldon, Everything You Ever Wanted to Know about Mormonism (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1992), 322.
  • Latayne Colvett Scott, The Mormon mirage : a former Mormon tells why she left the church (Grand Rapids : Zondervan Pub. House, 1979), 83.

Response

Only one temple?

info


Book of Mormon anachronisms/Temple in New World


Not enough people?

Conclusion

A summary of the argument against the criticism.

Further reading

FAIR wiki articles

Book of Mormon anachronisms/Temple in New World


FAIR web site

  • FAIR Topical Guide:

External links

  • Links to external web pages

Printed material

  • Daniel C. Peterson, “Is the Book of Mormon True? Notes on the Debate,” in Book of Mormon Authorship Revisited: The Evidence for Ancient Origins, edited by Noel B. Reynolds, (Provo, Utah : Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1997), Chapter 6.
  • John L. Sorenson, "Kingship and Temple in 2 Nephi 5-10," in John W. Welch, Reexploring the Book of Mormon (Salt Lake City, Utah : Deseret Book Co. ; Provo, Utah : Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1992), 66–68. ISBN 0875796001.[1]