User:InProgress/SWDN/Swedish questions/13

< User:InProgress‎ | SWDN‎ | Swedish questions

Revision as of 10:42, 19 October 2013 by RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (: mod)

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

A FairMormon Response to Questions Asked in Swedish Fireside with Elder's Jensen and Turley

1: BoM translation2: Polygamy and Polyandry3: Polygamy forced?4: Book of Abraham5: "Lying for Lord"6: Mark Hofmann7: Blood atonement8: First Vision9: Sanitized history10: "Not all truth is useful"11: Angelic affidavits12: Blacks and priesthood13: Temple concerns14: Evidence of Vikings15: Adam-God16: Kinderhook

∗       ∗       ∗

 [needs work]Need Turley answers?

Question:
  • When I went to the temple the first time, it was 1970 in Switzerland. And after being in there the first day, I was terrified. I couldn’t sleep at night. I thought, what is this, you know? There was a black hole in my heart and I had nightmares the whole week. I thought, what is this? Have I been deceived?

Short Answer:
  • Question: Why would one react to the temple in a negative manner?
    Answer: Everyone reacts differently.

Again, short answer, the way people react to the temple experience depends on their culture. There are some people in some cultures who go to the temple and they react very positively and there are others who do not.
Elder Turley's answer to this question at the Sweden fireside.

—Elder Turley's response to this question at the Sweden fireside
  • Question: Was the temple experience more disturbing prior to 1990 because of the penalties?
    Answer:

I remember sitting with our first daughter, actually, who went on a mission to Germany, after her first temple endowment which I attended with her. (Question from Hans Mattsson: When was that?) Pre-90. And I was her stake president, so I did my best to prepare her. Since then the church, as you know, has produced “Endowed From on High” which is the seventh lesson course for temple preparation, which I’m sure you must have in Sweden. But the temple, because we have a very practical and utilitarian religion, we don’t have the rich liturgy that the Catholics have or the Protestants. So the temple for most people initially is a very different experience, Hans, as it was for you....Well, I know. I think my little daughter was quite worthy, but she was so disturbed, I’ll say. So surprised by the nature of what happened there that I’m not sure the Holy Ghost had a chance to really help her that day. I remember sitting with her in the celestial room while she cried and said, Dad what’s this all about? And I wish I had done a better job. But, she has persisted and I said to her if you’ll keep coming and keep learning and keep praying about it, you’ll…mother of four little boys…and loves what she feels there. But it’s taken some time. It isn’t a tap we can always turn on.

—Elder Jensen's response to this question at the Sweden fireside
  • This experience is distressing, and it is possible that the speaker was ill-served by those who should have prepared him/her for the experience of the temple. One can hope that such preparation is now more effective, more than forty years later.
  • The answers to such questions—such as Have I been deceived?—must be found where the Church has always taught they should be sought: from God Himself via a personal revelatory experience. No historical or academic analysis can answer the question.

</blockquote>