Difference between revisions of "Mormon responses to atheism"

(Blanked the page)
(Undo revision 99223 by MikeSantoy (talk))
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
 +
{{summary}}
 +
<onlyinclude>
 +
=[[Mormon responses to atheism]]=
 +
{{SummaryItem
 +
|link=Holy Ghost/Burning in the bosom
 +
|subject=Subjective revelation
 +
|summary=Critics complain that the LDS appeal to "revelation" or a "burning in the bosom" is subjective, emotion-based, and thus unreliable and susceptible to self-deception. Sectarian critics also belittle appeals to spiritual experiences, comparing them to "warm fuzzies," or merely something "felt by simply watching a Hollywood movie."
 +
}}
 +
</onlyinclude>
  
 +
{{FurtherReading}}
 +
 +
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
 +
 +
[[fr:Atheism]]

Revision as of 22:06, 29 November 2012

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3


Mormon responses to atheism

Subjective revelation

Summary: Critics complain that the LDS appeal to "revelation" or a "burning in the bosom" is subjective, emotion-based, and thus unreliable and susceptible to self-deception. Sectarian critics also belittle appeals to spiritual experiences, comparing them to "warm fuzzies," or merely something "felt by simply watching a Hollywood movie."



Further reading and additional sources responding to these claims