Difference between revisions of "Book of Abraham/Plagiarism accusations"

({{Subarticles label}}: format)
(change tag)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
 
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
{{draft}}
+
{{summary}}
  
 
=={{Criticism label}}==
 
=={{Criticism label}}==

Revision as of 20:30, 30 March 2012

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3


==

Questions

== Critics look to numerous contemporary sources to explain how Joseph Smith was able to produce the Book of Abraham.

To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, click here

==

Sub-articles


== The following contemporary sources are claimed by various critics to be sources for the Book of Abraham.

Genesis

Josephus

Philosophy of a Future State by Thomas Dick]]

Summary: Critics claim that Joseph Smith's theology as described in the Book of Abraham was influenced by Thomas Dick's book The Philosophy of a Future State.