Revision as of 14:50, 15 May 2011 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (mod) ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:52, 15 May 2011 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (→‎{{Topics label}}: mod) Newer edit →
Line 13:		Line 13:
	|link=/History of the belief in a three-part heaven		|link=/History of the belief in a three-part heaven
	|subject=History of the belief in a three-part heaven		|subject=History of the belief in a three-part heaven
−	|summary=	+	|summary=Having said that, it so happens that there is an embarrassment of riches when it comes to sources contemporary with or within a few centuries of Paul, sources that showed consistently what ancient Christians and Jews believed in-enough, as it happens, to establish not just an objection to an argument from absence, but an actual consensus. And that consensus is exactly the opposite of what critics claim.
	}}		}}
	{{SummaryItem		{{SummaryItem

---

Revision as of 14:52, 15 May 2011

1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

The Three Degrees of Glory

==

Topics

==

Concept of Hell

History of the belief in a three-part heaven

Summary: Having said that, it so happens that there is an embarrassment of riches when it comes to sources contemporary with or within a few centuries of Paul, sources that showed consistently what ancient Christians and Jews believed in-enough, as it happens, to establish not just an objection to an argument from absence, but an actual consensus. And that consensus is exactly the opposite of what critics claim.

Meaning of "telestial"

Not biblical

Progression between kingdoms

Swedenborg

Celestial kingdom