Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Books/The Changing World of Mormonism/Chapter 16"

m (GLSBot: Adding headers to all articles)
m (GLSBot: Adding footers to all articles)
Line 65: Line 65:
 
*Whitmer, ''An Address To All Believers In Christ'', p.35, 62-63
 
*Whitmer, ''An Address To All Believers In Christ'', p.35, 62-63
 
}}
 
}}
 +
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
  
 
[[fr:Specific works/The Changing World of Mormonism/Index/Chapter 16]]
 
[[fr:Specific works/The Changing World of Mormonism/Index/Chapter 16]]

Revision as of 01:12, 24 May 2010

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3


A FAIR Analysis of:
Criticism of Mormonism/Books
A work by author: Jerald and Sandra Tanner

Claims made in Chapter 16: The Priesthood

442

Claim
  • The concept of "priesthood" was added later to the Church and was a creation of Sidney Rigdon.

Author's source(s)
  • David Whitmer, An Address To All Believers In Christ, p.64.
Response
  •  Quotes another author's opinion as if it were fact: how does Whitmer know? Why did he say nothing about it at the time?
  •  Mind reading: author has no way of knowing this.: How do the Tanners or Whitmer know what Sidney talked Joseph into doing?
  • The scanty evidence for this claim will require the Tanners to simply repeat it in a few pages (see p. 445-446).
  • Priesthood/Restoration

443

Claim
  • Revelations on the restoration of the priesthood are not present in the Book of Commandments.

Author's source(s)
  • No source provided?  [ATTENTION!]
Response

443-444

Claim
  • The Aaronic priesthood was abolished at that death of Christ.

Author's source(s)
Response

445

Claim
  • The date of the restoration of the Melchizedik Priesthood is not known and the record of the event was added later.

Author's source(s)
  • History of the Church 1:40, footnote
Response
  •  Absurd claim: If Joseph was making the story up, why not just pick a date and stick to it? The uncertainty of dates is typical of real world events; any one clever enough to "fake" the restoration and organization of the Church could certainly pick a date off the top of his head. Who could argue with him?
  •  Misrepresentation of source: the cited source (History of the Church) does not, of course, say a thing about the priesthood restoration being fraudulent or a later invention.
  • Priesthood/Restoration/Melchizedek/Date

445-446

Claim
  • The idea of the Melchizedek Priesthood and ordaining men to be High Priests came from Sidney Rigdon.

Author's source(s)
  • Whitmer, An Address To All Believers In Christ, p.35, 62-63
Response
  •  Mind reading: author has no way of knowing this.: Making the same claim twice makes it no more convincing (see p. 442).
  • Priesthood/Restoration