Difference between revisions of "Doctrine and Covenants/Textual changes/Adam and Michael conflated in Doctrine and Covenants 137"

m (GLSBot: Adding headers to all articles)
m (GLSBot: Adding footers to all articles)
Line 39: Line 39:
  
 
{{DCPrint}}
 
{{DCPrint}}
 +
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
  
 
[[fr:Doctrine and Covenants/Textual changes/Adam and Michael conflated in Doctrine and Covenants 137]]
 
[[fr:Doctrine and Covenants/Textual changes/Adam and Michael conflated in Doctrine and Covenants 137]]

Revision as of 19:41, 23 May 2010

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3
==

Questions

==

  • The name "Michael" was deleted from Joseph Smith's vision of the Celestial Kingdom because Adam is Michael. Critics claim that the Church was trying to hide a "slip up" by Joseph Smith, who had identified Adam as Michael on multiple occasions in the past.

To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, click here

==

Detailed Analysis

==

Matthew Brown noted that the original text of this revelation may help explain what happened:

“[Warren] Parrish’s transcription of [Joseph Smith’s] vision [in Joseph Smith’s journal dated 21 January 1836] seems to differentiate Adam and the archangel Michael as two separate individuals. Yet [Joseph Smith] identified Michael as Adam at least a year earlier and made the same identification four years later.[1] The text recorded by Warren Parrish may provide a clue about its incorrect content. It reads: “I saw father Adam, and Abraham and Michael and my father and mother, my brother Alvin.”[2] The “Mi” of “Michael” and the word “my” that follows almost immediately after it have the exact same sound. The structures within the sentence are also identical (“and Mi . . . and my”). It seems, therefore, that Warren Parrish (a relatively recent convert [20 May 1833] and newly-assigned scribe for the Prophet [29 October 1835]) may have recorded a modified dittography based upon what he heard Joseph Smith say.[3]

Conclusions

Joseph tended to dictate his writings and even personal letters. Despite being in his "journal," the text is not something he produced himself, but something that a new scribe and member recorded--with an apparent error.

== Notes ==

  1. [note]  Oliver Cowdery, Kirtland, OH, to John Whitmer, [Liberty, MO], 1 January 1834, in Cowdery, Letterbook, 15; Revelation, ca. August 1830, in Doctrine and Covenants 50:2, 1835 ed. [D&C 27:11]; Richards, “Pocket Companion,” 74–75; Robert B. Thompson, sermon notes, 5 October 1840, [Joseph Smith] Collection, [Church History Library]; Dean C. Jessee, Mark Ashurst-McGee, and Richard L. Jensen, eds., The Joseph Smith Papers, Journals, Volume 1: 1832–1839 (Salt Lake City: The Church Historian’s Press, 2008), 167–68, n. 319.
  2. [note]  Joseph Smith Papers, Journals, Vol. 1: 1832-1839, 167–68.
  3. [note]  Matthew B. Brown, FAIR Conference address on Adam, text September 2009, endnote #54.

Further reading

FairMormon Answers articles

Template:DCWiki

FairMormon web site

D&C FairMormon articles on-line

External links

Template:DCLinks

Printed works

Template:DCPrint