Difference between revisions of "Biblical Keys for Discerning True and False Prophets/Considering Joseph Smith/Paradigm debate/A Pragmatic Approach"

m (GLSBot: Adding headers to all articles)
m (GLSBot: Adding footers to all articles)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
*It makes a great deal of sense to ask which of two actual and competing theories fits the facts better. (Kuhn, 147).
 
*It makes a great deal of sense to ask which of two actual and competing theories fits the facts better. (Kuhn, 147).
 
Paradigm choice is a value-based tentative decision (that is, faith), not rule-based final decision (that is, not perfect knowledge).
 
Paradigm choice is a value-based tentative decision (that is, faith), not rule-based final decision (that is, not perfect knowledge).
 +
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
  
 
[[fr:Biblical Keys for Discerning True and False Prophets/Considering Joseph Smith/Paradigm debate/A Pragmatic Approach]]
 
[[fr:Biblical Keys for Discerning True and False Prophets/Considering Joseph Smith/Paradigm debate/A Pragmatic Approach]]

Revision as of 15:48, 23 May 2010

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

[[{{{L}}}|{{{H}}}]]

A Pragmatic Approach to Paradigm Debate

  • Theories are neither verified, nor falsified, but assessed by a variety of criteria. (Barbour, 116)
  • It makes a great deal of sense to ask which of two actual and competing theories fits the facts better. (Kuhn, 147).

Paradigm choice is a value-based tentative decision (that is, faith), not rule-based final decision (that is, not perfect knowledge).