Difference between revisions of "Question: Is the doctrine that God the Father and Jesus Christ have physical bodies not Biblical?"

m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-Source(s) of the criticism +{{Criticism source label English}}, -Source(s) of the Criticism +{{Criticism source label English}}, -==Criticism== +=={{Criticism label}}==, -==Response== +=={{Response label}}==, -==Qu)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{draft}}
 
{{draft}}
  
==Criticism==
+
=={{Criticism label}}==
  
 
Critics attack the LDS doctrine of God the Father and Jesus Christ being corporeal beings—i.e., having physical bodies.  They claim that this doctrine is not Biblical.
 
Critics attack the LDS doctrine of God the Father and Jesus Christ being corporeal beings—i.e., having physical bodies.  They claim that this doctrine is not Biblical.
  
===Source(s) of the criticism===
+
==={{Criticism source label English}}===
  
  
==Response==
+
=={{Response label}}==
  
 
===John 4:24===
 
===John 4:24===
Line 30: Line 30:
 
Even the presumption that ''spirit'' means being immaterial is not scriptural, and is the product of later thinking:  "in Scripture...there is no indication that by spirit and soul were meant any such principles as form or immateriality."{{ref|wolfson1}}
 
Even the presumption that ''spirit'' means being immaterial is not scriptural, and is the product of later thinking:  "in Scripture...there is no indication that by spirit and soul were meant any such principles as form or immateriality."{{ref|wolfson1}}
  
==Conclusion==
+
=={{Conclusion label}}==
  
  
  
==Endnotes==
+
=={{Endnotes label}}==
  
 
#{{note|sanders1}} {{book|author=Joseph Newbould Sanders|title=A Commentary on the Gospel according to John, ed. B. A. Mastin|place=New York|publisher=Harper & Row|date=1968|start=148|end=149|ISBN=?}} (emphasis in original)
 
#{{note|sanders1}} {{book|author=Joseph Newbould Sanders|title=A Commentary on the Gospel according to John, ed. B. A. Mastin|place=New York|publisher=Harper & Row|date=1968|start=148|end=149|ISBN=?}} (emphasis in original)
 
#{{note|wolfson1}} {{book1|author=Harry A. Wolfson|title=Philo: Foundations of Religious Philosophy in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam|place=Cambridge|publisher=Harvard University Press|date=1948|start=2:95|ISBN=?}}
 
#{{note|wolfson1}} {{book1|author=Harry A. Wolfson|title=Philo: Foundations of Religious Philosophy in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam|place=Cambridge|publisher=Harvard University Press|date=1948|start=2:95|ISBN=?}}
  
==Further reading==
+
=={{Further reading label}}==
  
===FAIR wiki articles===
+
==={{FAIR wiki articles label}}===
  
  
===FAIR web site===
+
==={{FAIR web site label}}===
*FAIR Topical Guide:
+
*{{FAIR topical guide label}}
  
===External links===
+
==={{External links label}}===
 
*{{FR-11-2-6}}  
 
*{{FR-11-2-6}}  
  
===Printed material===
+
==={{Printed material label}}===
  
 
[[fr:Nature of God/Corporality]]
 
[[fr:Nature of God/Corporality]]

Revision as of 05:00, 4 May 2010

This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.

==

Questions

==

Critics attack the LDS doctrine of God the Father and Jesus Christ being corporeal beings—i.e., having physical bodies. They claim that this doctrine is not Biblical.

Source(s) of the criticism

==

Detailed Analysis

==

John 4:24

In John 4:24 Jesus says:

24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

It is sometimes claimed that this verse proves that God is non-corporeal: i.e., a spirit, and nothing but a spirit.

However, there is no indefinite article in Greek (the indefinite article in English is "a," as in "a spirit." The New International Version (NIV) translation of the same verse reads:

God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in spirit and truth.

One non-LDS work noted of this verse:

That God is spirit is not meant as a definition of God's being—though this is how the Stoics would have understood it. It is a metaphor of his mode of operation, as life-giving power, and it is no more to be taken literally than I John i. 5, "God is light", or Deut. iv. 24, "Your God is a devouring fire". It is only those who have received this power through Christ who can offer God a real worship.[1]

The absence of God's body is thus only present in this scripture if one approaches it with that preconception. There is nothing which requires such a reading, and much that does not.

Even the presumption that spirit means being immaterial is not scriptural, and is the product of later thinking: "in Scripture...there is no indication that by spirit and soul were meant any such principles as form or immateriality."[2]

==

Answer

==


== Notes ==

  1. [note]  Joseph Newbould Sanders, A Commentary on the Gospel according to John, ed. B. A. Mastin (New York: Harper & Row, 1968), 148–149. (emphasis in original)
  2. [note]  Harry A. Wolfson, Philo: Foundations of Religious Philosophy in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1948), 2:95. ISBN {{{isbn}}}.

Further reading

FairMormon Answers articles

FairMormon web site

  • FAIR Topical Guide:

External links

  • David L. Paulsen and R. Dennis Potter, "How Deep the Chasm? A Reply to Owen and Mosser's Review," FARMS Review of Books 11/2 (1999): 221–264. off-site

Printed material