Difference between revisions of "Book of Mormon/B.H. Roberts and "Studies of the Book of Mormon""

(External links: links - I'll replace them with templates later)
Line 27: Line 27:
 
===Printed material===  
 
===Printed material===  
 
*Printed resources whose text is not available online
 
*Printed resources whose text is not available online
 +
 +
[[fr:Book of Mormon/B.H. Roberts and "Studies of the Book of Mormon"]]

Revision as of 17:30, 1 May 2010

This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.

Criticism

  • Critics use B.H. Roberts' critical evaluation of Book of Mormon difficulties to support their arguments.

To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, click here

Response

Further reading

FAIR wiki articles

FAIR web site

External links

  • GospeLink Books, Complete List
  • Daniel C. Peterson, “Yet More Abuse of B.H. Roberts,” FARMS Review of Books 9/1 (1997): 69-86. off-site
  • Matthew Roper, “Unanswered Mormon Scholars,” FARMS Review of Books 9/1 (1997) (Note: only pages 98-110 are relevant to the issue of Roberts, but have some salient points not mentioned elsewhere.) off-site
  • "No Sir That’s Not History," off-site
  • "View of the Hebrews: An Un-Parallel," off-site
  • John Welch, “B.H. Roberts Affirms Book of Mormon Antiquity in Newly Released Manuscript” Insights: An Ancient Window 13/6 (November 1993). off-site

Printed material

  • Printed resources whose text is not available online