FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Mormonism and Wikipedia/Joseph Smith, Jr."
(→Analysis of article sections: rm) |
(→Analysis of article sections: mod) |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
*[[/1831 to 1838|Life in Ohio (1831–38)]] | *[[/1831 to 1838|Life in Ohio (1831–38)]] | ||
*[[/1838 to 1839|Life in Missouri (1838–39)]] | *[[/1838 to 1839|Life in Missouri (1838–39)]] | ||
| − | *[[/ | + | *[[/1839 - 1844|Life in Nauvoo, Illinois (1839–44)]] |
*[[/Death|Death]] | *[[/Death|Death]] | ||
*[[/Distinctive views and teachings|Distinctive views and teachings]] {{nw}} | *[[/Distinctive views and teachings|Distinctive views and teachings]] {{nw}} | ||
Revision as of 23:53, 8 January 2010
| First Vision | A FairMormon Analysis of Wikipedia: An analysis of Wikipedia article "Joseph Smith, Jr." A work by a collaboration of authors (Link to Wikipedia article here)
|
Golden plates |
| The name Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.. Wikipedia content is copied and made available under the GNU Free Documentation License. |
| High Level Summary | |
|---|---|
| Title | Wikipedia article "Joseph Smith, Jr." |
| Type | Website |
| Author(s) | Controlling editors COgden (primary), John Foxe (secondary) |
| Affiliation | LDS (COgden); Free Presbyterian (Foxe) |
| Accuracy | Excessive amounts of original research based upon synthesis of primary source material. Negative aspects emphasized, with positive aspects subdued, relegated to footnotes, or omitted. |
| Temple content | None |
An analysis of Wikipedia article "Joseph Smith, Jr." (Version 19 May 2009)
I've replaced older material in this section with new, narrative content that is more concise, more readable, well-referenced, and is better focused on Joseph Smith, Jr. I expect editing to be adequately explained.
—Wikipedia editor John "Foxe," asserting control over the "Joseph Smith, Jr." article (15 September 2008)
Your recent edits appear like thinly-veiled POV attempts at pushing an agenda, pushing your own narrative style (as opposed to the consensus of editors), and a wholesale discarding of material you yourself have determined doesn't fit the JSJr. POV profile you wish to appear. More readable? According to whom? You seem to think that a small cabal of Mormon/ex-Mormon writers have the final say on everything that happened historically. Best,
—Editor "A Sniper," responding to "Foxe" (15 September 2008)
I think you're a Mormon because you accused Foxe of pushing the material of "a small cabal of Mormon/ex-Mormon writers." OK, put your own writers on deck. Who are they? I notice that you don't actually deny being a Mormon. Come to think of it, maybe you consider yourself a "Latter-day Saint" or a "Latter Day Saint" rather than a "Mormon."
—Wikipedia editor "Hi540," joining the argument. (15 September 2008)
Look, Hi540 - you're focusing too much on me instead of the edits. I don't know who...you are, other than a Bob Jones buddy of Foxe. Regardless, I'm not a Mormon or member of any Latter Day Saint church. This I've always made clear. But what you've written above does show your POV - why exactly are you over here editing and what is your agenda? I mentioned Mormon/ex-Mormon because Foxe draws all references from either Mormons or axe-grinding ex-Mormons, other than one historian.
—Editor "A Sniper," responding to "Hi540" (15 September 2008)
The quotes above represent a typical exchange between editors on this article. Ironically, "A Sniper" responded to editor "Hi540" without knowing that this is actually another editing account controlled by John "Foxe." The account was likely being operated by a close relative during this exchange while the "Foxe" account was also active. It should also be noted that "Hi 540" is the Bob Jones University course code for "Historical Research & Writing"—one of many real-world tie-ins between John "Foxe" and "Hi540."
Analysis of article sections
The following sub-articles analyze sections of the Wikipedia "Joseph Smith, Jr." article. We do not address the introductory section. The sections examined are the following:
- Early years (1805–1827)
- Life in Ohio (1831–38)
- Life in Missouri (1838–39)
- Life in Nauvoo, Illinois (1839–44)
- Death
- Distinctive views and teachings [needs work]
- Legacy
Further reading
Mormonism and Wikipedia
FairMormon's approach to Wikipedia articles
FairMormon regularly receives queries about specific LDS-themed Wikipedia articles with requests that we somehow "fix" them. Although some individual members of FAIR may choose to edit Wikipedia articles, FairMormon as an organization does not. Controversial Wikipedia articles require constant maintenance and a significant amount of time. We prefer instead to respond to claims in the FAIR Wiki rather than fight the ongoing battle that LDS Wikipedia articles sometimes invite. From FAIR’s perspective, assertions made in LDS-themed Wikipedia articles are therefore treated just like any other critical (or, if one prefers, "anti-Mormon") work. As those articles are revised and updated, we will periodically update our reviews to match.
Who can edit Wikipedia articles?
Editors who wish to participate in editing LDS-themed Wikipedia articles can access the project page here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement. You are not required to be LDS in order to participate—there are a number of good non-LDS editors who have made valuable contributions to these articles.
Recommendations when editing Wikipedia articles
FAIR does not advocate removing any references from Wikipedia articles. The best approach to editing Wikipedia is to locate solid references to back up your position and add them rather than attempting to remove information. Individuals who intend to edit should be aware that posting information related to the real-world identities of Wikipedia editors will result in their being banned from editing Wikipedia. Attacking editors and attempting to "out" them on Wikipedia is considered very bad form. The best approach is to treat all Wikipedia editors, whether or not you agree or disagree with their approach, with respect and civility. An argumentative approach is not constructive to achieving a positive result, and will simply result in what is called an "edit war." Unfortunately, not all Wikipedia editors exhibit good faith toward other editors (see, for example, the comment above from "Duke53" or comments within these reviews made by John Foxe's sockpuppet "Hi540," both of whom repeatedly mocked LDS beliefs and LDS editors prior to their being banned.)
Do LDS editors control Wikipedia?
Although there exist editors on Wikipedia who openly declare their affiliation with the Church, they do not control Wikipedia. Ironically, some critics of the Church periodically falsely accuse Wikipedia editors of being LDS simply because they do not accept the critics' desired spin on a particular article.
Do "anti-Mormons" control Wikipedia?
Again, the answer is no. The truth is that Wikipedia is generally self-policing. Highly contentious articles do tend to draw the most passionate supporters and critics.
Why do certain LDS articles seem to be so negative?
Although some LDS-related Wikipedia articles may appear to have a negative tone, they are in reality quite a bit more balanced than certain critical works such as One Nation Under Gods. Although many critical editors often accuse LDS-related Wikipedia articles of being "faith promoting" or claim that they are just an extension of the Sunday School manual, this is rarely the case. Few, if any, Latter-day Saints would find Wikipedia articles to be "faith promoting." Generally, the believers think that the articles are too negative and the critics believe that the articles are too positive. LDS Wikipedia articles should be informative without being overtly faith promoting. However, most of the primary sources, including the words of Joseph Smith himself, are "faith promoting." This presents a dilemma for Wikipedia editors who want to remain neutral. The unfortunate consequence is that Joseph's words are rewritten and intermixed with contradictory sources, resulting in boring and confusing prose.
We examine selected Wikipedia articles and examine them on a "claim-by-claim" basis, with links to responses in the FairMormon Answers Wiki. Wikipedia articles are constantly evolving. As a result, the analysis of each article will be updated periodically in order to bring it more into line with the current version of the article. The latest revision date may be viewed at the top of each individual section. The process by which Wikipedia articles are reviewed is the following:
- Update each Wikipedia passage and its associated footnotes.
- Examine the use of sources and determine whether or not the passage accurately represents the source used.
- Provide links to response articles within the FairMormon Answers Wiki.
- If violation of Wikipedia rules is discovered, identify which Wikipedia editor (by pseudonym) made the edit, provide a description of the rule violated and a link to the Wikipedia "diff" showing the actual edit.
- If a violated rule is later corrected in a subsequent revision, the violation is removed and a notation is added that the passage is correct per cited sources. This doesn't mean that FAIR necessarily agrees with the passage—only that it is correct based upon the source used.
Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship, "Mormonism and Wikipedia: The Church History That “Anyone Can Edit”"
Roger Nicholson, Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship, (2012)The ability to quickly and easily access literature critical of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has been made significantly easier through the advent of the Internet. One of the primary sites that dominates search engine results is Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that “anyone can edit.” Wikipedia contains a large number of articles related to Mormonism that are edited by believers, critics, and neutral parties. The reliability of information regarding the Church and its history is subject to the biases of the editors who choose to modify those articles. Even if a wiki article is thoroughly sourced, editors sometimes employ source material in a manner that supports their bias. This essay explores the dynamics behind the creation of Wikipedia articles about the Church, the role that believers and critics play in that process, and the reliability of the information produced in the resulting wiki articles.
Click here to view the complete article
</noinclude>
Copyright © 2005–2024 FAIR. This is not an official Web site of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The content of this page may not be copied, published, or redistributed without the prior written consent of FAIR.
| We welcome your suggestions for improving the content of this FAIR Wiki article. |
Sites we recommend: |