Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Mormonism 101/Chapter 5"

(add)
(A review of Chapter: "The Fall": mod)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
 
Contrary to the LDS concept of the fall, the Bible shows that this event was the result of disobeying God. {{ref|mckeever.74}}
 
Contrary to the LDS concept of the fall, the Bible shows that this event was the result of disobeying God. {{ref|mckeever.74}}
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 +
This claim, however, directly contradicts {{s||Alma|42|2}}:
 +
<blockquote>
 +
And now, there was no means to reclaim men from this fallen state, which man had brought upon himself because of his own disobedience.
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
 
==Endnotes==
 
==Endnotes==
 
#{{note|mckeever.74}} Bill McKeever and Eric Johnson, Mormonism 101 (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 2001), 74.
 
#{{note|mckeever.74}} Bill McKeever and Eric Johnson, Mormonism 101 (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 2001), 74.

Revision as of 19:58, 29 October 2009


A work by author: Bill McKeever and Eric Johnson

A review of Chapter: "The Fall"

The authors claim,

Contrary to the LDS concept of the fall, the Bible shows that this event was the result of disobeying God. [1]

This claim, however, directly contradicts Alma 42꞉2:

And now, there was no means to reclaim men from this fallen state, which man had brought upon himself because of his own disobedience.

Endnotes

  1. [note]  Bill McKeever and Eric Johnson, Mormonism 101 (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 2001), 74.