FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Mormonism and Wikipedia/First Vision"
(created) |
(rm link) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|uplink=[[../|Mormonism and Wikipedia]] | |uplink=[[../|Mormonism and Wikipedia]] | ||
|section= | |section= | ||
− | |previous= | + | |previous= |
|next=[[../Joseph Smith, Jr.|Joseph Smith, Jr.]] | |next=[[../Joseph Smith, Jr.|Joseph Smith, Jr.]] | ||
|notes={{WikipediaDisclaimer}} | |notes={{WikipediaDisclaimer}} |
Revision as of 07:08, 13 September 2009
A FairMormon Analysis of Wikipedia: An analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision" A work by a collaboration of authors (Link to Wikipedia article here)
|
Joseph Smith, Jr. |
The name Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.. Wikipedia content is copied and made available under the GNU Free Documentation License. |
An analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"
"First Vision packs a lot more punch in a shorter amount of space..." Yes it does, John Foxe, because it is an anti-mormon tract written in the modern style. Today, the 'rant' of an older style tract would make most people's eyes roll, they wouldn't give it a moment's consideration. However, the First Vision article presents the anti-mormon POV in a scholarly tone. It criticizes without ever explicitly stating a criticism. It keeps certain things hidden in the dark. It is sly, sneaky, and underhanded. It reads like an anti-mormon tract written by Eddie Haskell after he went to graduate school. To use your own word John Foxe, it is 'foxey'.
Editor "74s181" (26 August 2007) off-site
The following sub-articles analyze sections of the Wikipedia "First Vision" article. We do not address the introductory section. The sections examined are the following: