Difference between revisions of "Mormonism and Wikipedia/First Vision"

(created)
 
(rm link)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
|uplink=[[../|Mormonism and Wikipedia]]
 
|uplink=[[../|Mormonism and Wikipedia]]
 
|section=
 
|section=
|previous=[[../Academic among amateurs|A study in contrasts: the dilemma of the “real world” academic on Wikipedia]]
+
|previous=
 
|next=[[../Joseph Smith, Jr.|Joseph Smith, Jr.]]
 
|next=[[../Joseph Smith, Jr.|Joseph Smith, Jr.]]
 
|notes={{WikipediaDisclaimer}}
 
|notes={{WikipediaDisclaimer}}

Revision as of 07:08, 13 September 2009


A FairMormon Analysis of Wikipedia: An analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"
A work by a collaboration of authors (Link to Wikipedia article here)
The name Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.. Wikipedia content is copied and made available under the GNU Free Documentation License.

An analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"

"First Vision packs a lot more punch in a shorter amount of space..." Yes it does, John Foxe, because it is an anti-mormon tract written in the modern style. Today, the 'rant' of an older style tract would make most people's eyes roll, they wouldn't give it a moment's consideration. However, the First Vision article presents the anti-mormon POV in a scholarly tone. It criticizes without ever explicitly stating a criticism. It keeps certain things hidden in the dark. It is sly, sneaky, and underhanded. It reads like an anti-mormon tract written by Eddie Haskell after he went to graduate school. To use your own word John Foxe, it is 'foxey'.
Editor "74s181" (26 August 2007) off-site
∗       ∗       ∗

The following sub-articles analyze sections of the Wikipedia "First Vision" article. We do not address the introductory section. The sections examined are the following: