FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Question: Do the statements in the Book of Abraham regarding Kolob's revolution time make any sense?"
RonHellings1 (talk | contribs) |
RonHellings1 (talk | contribs) (→Response) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Mr. Anderson and the authors of the web page have confused <i>rotation</i> with <i>revolution</i>. Though the technical distinction is often blurred, even by astronomers in today's world, at the time of Joseph Smith, the two terms denoted technically different things. 'To rotate' means to spin on an axis, like a top or like a planet. It applies only to an extended body. 'To revolve' means to go around. This term may be applied to a point that moves around another point. The Book of Abraham uses the term 'revolution' and it clearly gets the term right. {{scripture||Abraham|3|5}} States: | Mr. Anderson and the authors of the web page have confused <i>rotation</i> with <i>revolution</i>. Though the technical distinction is often blurred, even by astronomers in today's world, at the time of Joseph Smith, the two terms denoted technically different things. 'To rotate' means to spin on an axis, like a top or like a planet. It applies only to an extended body. 'To revolve' means to go around. This term may be applied to a point that moves around another point. The Book of Abraham uses the term 'revolution' and it clearly gets the term right. {{scripture||Abraham|3|5}} States: | ||
| − | 5 And the Lord said unto me: The planet which is the lesser light, lesser than that which is to rule the day, even the night, is above or greater than that upon which thou standest in point of reckoning, for it moveth in order more slow; this is in order because it standeth above the earth upon which thou standest, therefore the reckoning of its time is not so many as to its number of days, and of months, and of years. | + | :5 And the Lord said unto me: The planet which is the lesser light, lesser than that which is to rule the day, even the night, is above or greater than that upon which thou standest in point of reckoning, for it moveth in order more slow; this is in order because it standeth above the earth upon which thou standest, therefore the reckoning of its time is not so many as to its number of days, and of months, and of years. |
==Conclusion== | ==Conclusion== | ||
Until someone can make a convincing case that their interpretation of these things is the only reasonable one, any faith-promoting proof from Abraham’s astronomy is a flimsy house of cards and any faith-destroying attack on some straw-man interpretation is laughable. Among the laughable interpretations is the unjustified suggestion that Abraham taught that the photons leaving the surface of the sun actually came from Kolob. | Until someone can make a convincing case that their interpretation of these things is the only reasonable one, any faith-promoting proof from Abraham’s astronomy is a flimsy house of cards and any faith-destroying attack on some straw-man interpretation is laughable. Among the laughable interpretations is the unjustified suggestion that Abraham taught that the photons leaving the surface of the sun actually came from Kolob. | ||
Revision as of 13:24, 3 September 2009
Criticism
"LDS doctrine regarding astronomy is permeated with references to time being measured, or 'reckoned' according to a star's or planet's rate of rotation. Furthermore, this 'reckoning of time' is a prime distinguisher in terms of 'greatness.' From the standpoint of modern cosmology, this makes no sense at all. Rates of rotation are largely arbitrary, and of little comment or concern from a fundamental point of view."
Source(s) of the criticism
- Duwayne R. Anderson, Farewell to Eden- Coming to terms with Mormonism and Science (First Books Library, 2003) 110-114.
- MormonThink, “Conflicts with Science,” mormonthink.com (accessed 3 Aug 2009).
Response
Mr. Anderson and the authors of the web page have confused rotation with revolution. Though the technical distinction is often blurred, even by astronomers in today's world, at the time of Joseph Smith, the two terms denoted technically different things. 'To rotate' means to spin on an axis, like a top or like a planet. It applies only to an extended body. 'To revolve' means to go around. This term may be applied to a point that moves around another point. The Book of Abraham uses the term 'revolution' and it clearly gets the term right. Abraham 3:5 States:
- 5 And the Lord said unto me: The planet which is the lesser light, lesser than that which is to rule the day, even the night, is above or greater than that upon which thou standest in point of reckoning, for it moveth in order more slow; this is in order because it standeth above the earth upon which thou standest, therefore the reckoning of its time is not so many as to its number of days, and of months, and of years.
Conclusion
Until someone can make a convincing case that their interpretation of these things is the only reasonable one, any faith-promoting proof from Abraham’s astronomy is a flimsy house of cards and any faith-destroying attack on some straw-man interpretation is laughable. Among the laughable interpretations is the unjustified suggestion that Abraham taught that the photons leaving the surface of the sun actually came from Kolob.