Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Books/American Massacre/Chapter 10"

152

• The event was referred to as the "blood feast of the Danites."

•  Prejudicial or loaded language: this inflammatory language is unsourced, and provided without evidence.
• Danites
• Danites in anti-Mormon polemic

• No source provided.

152

• It is claimed that it is "inconceivable that a crime of this magnitude could have occurred" without being directly ordered by Brigham Young, and that "[v]irtually every federal officer who became involved in future investigations" of the massacre concluded that Brigham "personally ordered" the attack.

•  Absurd claim: why is in "inconceivable" that a crime could be committed in southern Utah without Brigham's direct order? The Massacre site was, which required an arduous horseback race of nearly 300 miles, which took from 7–13 September to send and receive a message from Brigham Young.^[1] Is Brigham to be held responsible for every crime committed in the territory?
• Brigham Young ordered Mountain Meadows Massacre?
• The initial prosecution of those responsible for the murders failed because federal officials were so anxious to tie them to Brigham Young—but the evidence to do so did not exist.
• Brigham Young and the prosecution of Mountain Meadows Massacre

• The author notes that Lee "would have carried out no orders which he thought would be contrary to the wishes of Brigham Young," citing Juanita Brooks, The Mountain Meadows Massacre, p. 80.

153

• The author claims that the murderers reported that a "divine revelation from Brigham Young" was read aloud which commanded them to attack the "cursed gentiles" and "attack them, disguised as Indians" and "leave none to tell the tale."

•  Prejudicial or loaded language
• The author's source is a nineteenth-century anti-Mormon expose–hardly a reliable source.
• It is unsurprising that the murderers would attempt to claim they were "only following orders."
• "Her source for this alleged fact is to a sensational exposé common of the era: Catharine Van Valkenburg Waite's The Mormon Prophet and His Harem; Or, An Authentic History of Brigham Young, His Numerous Wives and Children. Waite was an early suffragist married to a federal judge. She did not name names or provide sources in her book. Her stated objective was to reclaim the "suffering women of Utah." She is the sole source for this "revelation," which has no basis in historical fact."^[2]
• Brigham Young's letter commanded those in southern Utah to leave the immigrants alone.
• Brigham Young did not order the Mountain Meadows Massacre

• C. V. Waite, The Mormon Prophet and His Harem (1866), 66.

154-155

• Helen Brockett "was told by her grandmother that her great-grandfather J.J. Davidson had been ordered by Brigham Young to go south to participate in the slaughter." It is claimed that "Young called in the Avenging angels and told them to use bows and arrows to shoot the people in the back after they were already dead to make it look like Indians did it."

• The author here relies on a fourth-hand account—something Brockett's grandmother said that her great-grandfather said that Brigham Young said. This is unpersuasive when contemporary evidence indicates that Brigham ordered the immigrants be allowed to pass unmolested.
• Brigham Young's letter commanded those in southern Utah to leave the immigrants alone.
• Brigham Young did not order the Mountain Meadows Massacre
• Ronald W. Walker, "'Save the Emigrants': Joseph Clewes on the Mountain Meadows Massacre," Brigham Young University Studies 42 no. 1 (2003), 139–152. PDF link

• Author's telephone interview with Helen Brockett, October 18, 2002.

156

• The author claims that the Church invented the myth of "poisoned springs."

•  History unclear or in error: "The Church" did not invent the "poisoned spring" myth. Some members of the Church who wished to justify their murders after the fact used claims about poisoning to excuse their deeds. (It may be that some sincerely believed the springs to have been poisoned, when anthrax was instead responsible for the deaths of livestock.)^[3] In any case, the sincerity of belief that the springs were poisoned in no way justifies the massacre.

• The author states in an endnote on page 266 that "the poison tale was never told the same way twice," citing Will Bagley, Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows (University of Oklahoma Press, 2002), 119.
• Compare treatment in Blood of the Prophets: p. 119.
• The author also cites Forney to Greenwood, August 1859, "The Massacre at Mountain Meadows," Harper's.

158

• It is claimed that on September 1, 1857, Brigham enlisted the support of the Indians "against the wagon train."

•  Misrepresentation of source: Huntington's diary indicates that Indians were being recruited to scatter all cattle ahead of the approaching U.S. army and any other wagon trains. This had nothing to do with attacking people.
•  Quotes another author's opinion as if it were fact: the author here likely follows Will Bagley's Blood of the Prophets which likewise contains a serious distortion of Huntington's journal.
• Dimick Huntington Diary, 1 September 1857

• Journal of Dimick Baker Huntington, September 1, 1857.

159

• Indians were not involved with the massacre; it was all Mormons.

•  Misrepresentation of source: "Denton has deceived the reader with the way she uses the Hurt report. The Indians' first report to Hurt, from Indians not affiliated with the Paiutes, was that Indians were not responsible. This is the only quotation Denton uses. But Hurt was suspicious, and he investigated further. He found and reported the truth. Indians and Mormons committed the atrocity. Yet, because Hurt's final conclusions don't square with Denton's thesis, we are not told about them."^[4]

•  ^[ATTENTION!]