Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Nauvoo Polygamy/Chapter 2"

(format)
(format)
Line 200: Line 200:
  
 
====65====
 
====65====
−
||"One of the instrumental people in the inauguration of plural marriage was John [C.] Bennett…."
+
||
 +
*The author claims that "[o]ne of the instrumental people in the inauguration of plural marriage was John [C.] Bennett…."
 
||
 
||
 
*A huge leap, presuming that Bennett's adulteries were ever sanctioned by Joseph, or had anything to do with plural marriage.
 
*A huge leap, presuming that Bennett's adulteries were ever sanctioned by Joseph, or had anything to do with plural marriage.
Line 211: Line 212:
  
 
====65====
 
====65====
−
||"…in 1841 [Bennett] functioned as perhaps Joseph Smith's closest confident."
+
||
 +
*The author notes that in 1841, John C. Bennett was Joseph Smith's "closest confident." {{attn}}
 
||
 
||
 
*Ignores that Joseph began to distrust him for cause long before their public rupture.
 
*Ignores that Joseph began to distrust him for cause long before their public rupture.
Line 223: Line 225:
  
 
====65====
 
====65====
−
||Joseph was "sharing power" with Bennett
+
||
 +
*It is claimed that Joseph was "sharing power" with Bennett.
 
||
 
||
 
*Bennett's power was mainly secular.  He did little in the religious realm.  Joseph had wanted to be relieved of temporal responsibilities, and Bennett was available.
 
*Bennett's power was mainly secular.  He did little in the religious realm.  Joseph had wanted to be relieved of temporal responsibilities, and Bennett was available.
Line 233: Line 236:
 
|
 
|
 
====65====
 
====65====
−
||"In the spring of 1842, Bennett spoke out against Smith and was soon stripped of his offices and titles."
+
||
 +
*It is claimed that in 1842, John C. Bennett spoke out against Joseph "and was soon stripped of his offices and titles."
 
||
 
||
 
*Bennett was guilty of serial immoralities, and had been disciplined on multiple occasions.  He only "spoke out" once he learned that he was to be stripped of membership in the Church.
 
*Bennett was guilty of serial immoralities, and had been disciplined on multiple occasions.  He only "spoke out" once he learned that he was to be stripped of membership in the Church.
Line 244: Line 248:
 
|
 
|
 
====65====
 
====65====
−
||"Each accused the other of immoral behavior."
+
||
 +
*It is claimed that John C. Bennett and Joseph each "accused the other of immoral behavior."
 
||
 
||
 
*Bennett was accused by far more people, over a far greater length of time, of "immoral behavior."  Many of his accusers were not LDS and had nothing to do with the Mormons.   
 
*Bennett was accused by far more people, over a far greater length of time, of "immoral behavior."  Many of his accusers were not LDS and had nothing to do with the Mormons.   
Line 256: Line 261:
  
 
====65====
 
====65====
−
||"While some of his claims may have been exaggerations, much of what he reported can be confirmed by other eyewitness accounts."
+
||
 +
*The author attempts to rehabilitate John C. Bennett by claiming: "While some of his claims may have been exaggerations, much of what he reported can be confirmed by other eyewitness accounts."
 
||
 
||
 
*Many of Bennett's claims are clearly false.
 
*Many of Bennett's claims are clearly false.
Line 270: Line 276:
  
 
====65====
 
====65====
−
||"Even though his statements must be weighed critically, he cannot be merely dismissed as an unfriendly source who fabricated scandal."
+
||
 +
*Yet more attempt to make Bennett a credible witness: "Even though his statements must be weighed critically, he cannot be merely dismissed as an unfriendly source who fabricated scandal."
 
||
 
||
 
*The author never does this weighing for us.
 
*The author never does this weighing for us.
Line 284: Line 291:
  
 
====65====
 
====65====
−
||"Bennett had an ambitious but colorful background."
+
||
 +
*The author claims that "Bennett had an ambitious but colorful background."
 
||
 
||
 
*This hides a mountain of evidence about Bennett's pre-LDS behavior, including:
 
*This hides a mountain of evidence about Bennett's pre-LDS behavior, including:
Line 301: Line 309:
  
 
====66-67====
 
====66-67====
−
||"Writing on March 23, 1846, Bennett claimed to have known 'Joseph better than any other man living for at least fourteen months!'….Bennett was well positioned to know all about any behind-the-scenes transactions.
+
||
 +
*{{AuthorQuote|"Writing on March 23, 1846, Bennett claimed to have known 'Joseph better than any other man living for at least fourteen months!'….Bennett was well positioned to know all about any behind-the-scenes transactions.}}
 
||
 
||
 
*The author here accepts Bennett uncritically.
 
*The author here accepts Bennett uncritically.
Line 315: Line 324:
  
 
====68====
 
====68====
−
||“Joseph” is merely “feigning impartiality” before going on to practice “undemocratic block voting”
+
||
 +
*The author claims that Joseph is merely “feigning impartiality” before going on to practice “undemocratic block voting.”
 
||
 
||
 
*Block voting is not undemocratic—many interest groups vote ''en masse'' for candidates which will meet their needs.
 
*Block voting is not undemocratic—many interest groups vote ''en masse'' for candidates which will meet their needs.
Line 327: Line 337:
  
 
====69====
 
====69====
−
||"Undeterred" by reports of a negative assessment of Bennett, Joseph "named Bennett Assistant President of the Church."
+
||
 +
*The author notes that Joseph was apparently "undeterred" by reports of a negative assessment of Bennett, and proceeded to name him Assistant President of the Church.
 
||
 
||
 
*Joseph knew from personal experience that "it is no uncommon thing for good men to be evil spoken against," and did nothing precipitous.  
 
*Joseph knew from personal experience that "it is no uncommon thing for good men to be evil spoken against," and did nothing precipitous.  
Line 339: Line 350:
  
 
====69====
 
====69====
−
||Bennett was Assistant President of the Church
+
||
 +
*It is noted that John C. Bennett was Assistant President of the Church.
 
||
 
||
 
*Sidney Rigdon, a counselor in the First Presidency, was frequently ill.  On April 8, "John C. Bennett was presented, with the First Presidency, as Assistant President until President Rigdon's health should be restored."  Modern readers should be cautious in projecting the role of the current First Presidency on Joseph's day.  In the modern Church, the First Presidency is almost always composed of two apostles who have extensive experience in ecclesiastical affairs called to serve with the President.  In Joseph's day, this was not the case.  Most of Joseph's counselors in the First Presidency were to betray his trust, including Jesse Gause, Frederick G. Williams, Sidney Rigdon, William Law and John C. Bennett. While some of these counselors received keys, Bennett did not.    None were apostles prior to their call.
 
*Sidney Rigdon, a counselor in the First Presidency, was frequently ill.  On April 8, "John C. Bennett was presented, with the First Presidency, as Assistant President until President Rigdon's health should be restored."  Modern readers should be cautious in projecting the role of the current First Presidency on Joseph's day.  In the modern Church, the First Presidency is almost always composed of two apostles who have extensive experience in ecclesiastical affairs called to serve with the President.  In Joseph's day, this was not the case.  Most of Joseph's counselors in the First Presidency were to betray his trust, including Jesse Gause, Frederick G. Williams, Sidney Rigdon, William Law and John C. Bennett. While some of these counselors received keys, Bennett did not.    None were apostles prior to their call.
Line 351: Line 363:
  
 
====69====
 
====69====
−
||Bennett had religious influence by being Assistant President of the Church.
+
||
 +
*It is claimed that John C. Bennett had religious influence by being Assistant President of the Church.
 
||
 
||
 
*[This is not stated baldly, but some readers might be confused.]
 
*[This is not stated baldly, but some readers might be confused.]
Line 363: Line 376:
  
 
====70====
 
====70====
−
||Smith and Bennett remained confidants until about March the next year (1842)
+
||
 +
*The author claims that Joseph Smith and John C. Bennett remained confidants until about March the next year (1842)
 
||
 
||
 
* Bennett was confronted with the charges mentioned above in the summer of 1841.
 
* Bennett was confronted with the charges mentioned above in the summer of 1841.
Line 376: Line 390:
  
 
====70====
 
====70====
−
||There seemed to be no office or honor within reach that Smith did not hasten to grant to Bennett.
+
||
 +
*It is claimed that there seemed to be "no office or honor within reach that Smith did not hasten to grant to Bennett."
 
||
 
||
 
*This is false: Bennett was never inducted into the "Quorum of the Anointed"—those who were receiving the temple endowment from Joseph (see above, [[../Chapter_2#66-67|66-67]]).
 
*This is false: Bennett was never inducted into the "Quorum of the Anointed"—those who were receiving the temple endowment from Joseph (see above, [[../Chapter_2#66-67|66-67]]).
Line 389: Line 404:
  
 
====70====
 
====70====
−
||"Zina Huntington, who married Henry Jacobs instead but then reconsidered seven months later in response to Joseph's restated interest."
+
||
 +
*{{AuthorQuote|"Zina Huntington, who married Henry Jacobs instead but then reconsidered seven months later in response to Joseph's restated interest."}}
 
||
 
||
 
*Zina said the Lord [[Plural_marriage_spiritual_manifestations#Zina_Huntington|told her what to do]].
 
*Zina said the Lord [[Plural_marriage_spiritual_manifestations#Zina_Huntington|told her what to do]].
Line 401: Line 417:
  
 
====70-71====
 
====70-71====
−
||"Seemingly impatient, Joseph soon after married Zina's sister, Presendia, who was also already married."
+
||
 +
*{{AuthorQuote|"Seemingly impatient, Joseph soon after married Zina's sister, Presendia, who was also already married."}}
 
||
 
||
 
*[[Joseph Smith and polyandry]]
 
*[[Joseph Smith and polyandry]]
Line 412: Line 429:
  
 
====71====
 
====71====
−
||"Bennett alleged that during the summer and fall of 1841, Smith made unsuccessful advances toward Apostle Orson Pratt's wife, Sarah."
+
||
 +
*The author notes that "Bennett alleged that during the summer and fall of 1841, Smith made unsuccessful advances toward Apostle Orson Pratt's wife, Sarah."
 
||
 
||
 
*The author does not tell us that Sarah and Bennett were probably having an affair, as witnessed by LDS and non-LDS witnesses, and a plausible time-line.
 
*The author does not tell us that Sarah and Bennett were probably having an affair, as witnessed by LDS and non-LDS witnesses, and a plausible time-line.
Line 423: Line 441:
  
 
====71====
 
====71====
−
||"Whatever the accuracy of the quotes [i.e., Bennett's claims] the two men [Orson and Joseph] quarrelled…."
+
||
 +
*It is notes that "[w]hatever the accuracy of the quotes [i.e., Bennett's claims] the two men [Orson and Joseph] quarrelled…."
 
||
 
||
 
*The author here avoids the necessity of dealing with the problems in Bennett's account.
 
*The author here avoids the necessity of dealing with the problems in Bennett's account.
Line 432: Line 451:
 
|
 
|
 
====71====
 
====71====
−
||"…the important aspect of this incident is that it tells us less about Bennett's motive in recalling this dispute and more about Orson's willingness to support his wife over his religious leader…."
+
||
 +
*{{AuthorQuote|"…the important aspect of this incident is that it tells us less about Bennett's motive in recalling this dispute and more about Orson's willingness to support his wife over his religious leader…."}}
 
||
 
||
 
*"Recalling" assumes that Bennett's account is truthful, and not fabricated.  This has not been demonstrated.
 
*"Recalling" assumes that Bennett's account is truthful, and not fabricated.  This has not been demonstrated.
Line 442: Line 462:
  
 
====71====
 
====71====
−
||"However, Joseph concluded that she had been wrong to reject him—and that she had failed the test. The defiance she exhibited ultimately led to alienation with her husband…."
+
||
 +
*The author concludes that Joseph believe that Sarah Pratt "had been wrong to reject him—and that she had failed the test. The defiance she exhibited ultimately led to alienation with her husband…."
 
||
 
||
 
*The author again says nothing about Sarah and Bennett's affair, which probably had something to do with her "alienation."
 
*The author again says nothing about Sarah and Bennett's affair, which probably had something to do with her "alienation."
Line 453: Line 474:
  
 
====72====
 
====72====
−
||"Eventually Orson accepted Joseph's explanation that he merely wanted to test Sarah's obedience, and was not seriously courting this married woman."
+
||
 +
*The author notes that Orson Pratt eventually accepted Joseph's explanation "that he merely wanted to test Sarah's obedience, and was not seriously courting this married woman."
 
||
 
||
 
*The author does not tell us that Orson eventually believed Sarah and Bennett had misled him, saying he was first informed by "a wicked source, from those disaffected, but as soon as he learned the truth he was satisfied."{{ref|pratt1}} He presents no evidence for what explanation Joseph gave Orson, or what Orson believed.
 
*The author does not tell us that Orson eventually believed Sarah and Bennett had misled him, saying he was first informed by "a wicked source, from those disaffected, but as soon as he learned the truth he was satisfied."{{ref|pratt1}} He presents no evidence for what explanation Joseph gave Orson, or what Orson believed.
Line 463: Line 485:
  
 
====72====
 
====72====
−
||"Meanwhile, Bennett seems to have followed his leader in courting several women himself."
+
||
 +
*{{AuthorQuote|"Meanwhile, Bennett seems to have followed his leader in courting several women himself."}}
 
||
 
||
 
*The author is here presuming that Bennett imitated Joseph.
 
*The author is here presuming that Bennett imitated Joseph.
Line 475: Line 498:
  
 
====72====
 
====72====
−
||"Bennett resigned from the church on May 17, 1842."
+
||
 +
*The author claims that John C. Bennett resigned from the church on May 17, 1842.
 
||
 
||
 
*{{HistoricalError}}: In fact, Bennett was forced to resign by Joseph, who wrote to the Church recorder: "be so good as to permit Bennett to withdraw his name from the Church record, if he desires to do so, and this with the best of feelings towards…General Bennett."{{ref|bennett1}}
 
*{{HistoricalError}}: In fact, Bennett was forced to resign by Joseph, who wrote to the Church recorder: "be so good as to permit Bennett to withdraw his name from the Church record, if he desires to do so, and this with the best of feelings towards…General Bennett."{{ref|bennett1}}
Line 486: Line 510:
  
 
====72====
 
====72====
−
||"In retaliation, church leaders apparently excommunicated him on May 25…."
+
||
 +
*It is claimed that Bennett was excommunicated from the Church in "retaliation."
 
||
 
||
 
*This was not in retaliation, since Joseph had pushed for Bennett's resignation.
 
*This was not in retaliation, since Joseph had pushed for Bennett's resignation.
Line 500: Line 525:
  
 
====72====
 
====72====
−
||"…Bennett claimed [his excommunication] was postdated to May 11 to appear that it had occurred before his resignation."
+
||
 +
*John C. Bennett claimed that his excommunication was postdated to May 11 to appear that it had occurred before his resignation.
 
||
 
||
 
*{{GDS-See also|2a|119}}
 
*{{GDS-See also|2a|119}}
Line 519: Line 545:
  
 
====73====
 
====73====
−
||"Up until early 1842, Smith and Bennett seemed to be on good terms."
+
||
 +
*The author claims that up until early 1842, Joseph Smith and John C. Bennett "seemed to be on good terms."
 
||
 
||
 
*Joseph was aware of Bennett's problems by 1841 at least.
 
*Joseph was aware of Bennett's problems by 1841 at least.
Line 530: Line 557:
  
 
====73====
 
====73====
−
||"It is entirely plausible that Bennett was then privy to Smith's domestic matters."
+
||
 +
*{{AuthorQuote|"It is entirely plausible that Bennett was then privy to Smith's domestic matters."}}
 
||
 
||
 
*The author wants to rehabilitate Bennett as a source, while glossing over the problems.
 
*The author wants to rehabilitate Bennett as a source, while glossing over the problems.
Line 540: Line 568:
 
|
 
|
 
====73====
 
====73====
−
||"In the spring of 1842, the two men quarreled and Smith had Bennett excommunicated…."
+
||
 +
*The author notes that "[i]n the spring of 1842, the two men quarreled and Smith had Bennett excommunicated…."
 
||
 
||
 
*Joseph and Bennett did not "quarrel"—evidence of further seduction and infidelity by Bennett came to light.
 
*Joseph and Bennett did not "quarrel"—evidence of further seduction and infidelity by Bennett came to light.
Line 552: Line 581:
 
|
 
|
 
====75====
 
====75====
−
||Zina and Henry Jacobs "were apparently willing to let the prophet insinuate himself into their marriage."
+
||
 +
*Zina and Henry Jacobs "were apparently willing to let the prophet insinuate himself into their marriage."
 
||
 
||
 
*{{InternalContradiction|compare p. 81}}
 
*{{InternalContradiction|compare p. 81}}
Line 563: Line 593:
  
 
====75====
 
====75====
−
||"In the context of having just married a pregnant wife, [Joseph's] words acquire added meaning: 'If you will not accuse me, I will not accuse you….'"
+
||
 +
*{{AuthorQuote|"In the context of having just married a pregnant wife, [Joseph's] words acquire added meaning: 'If you will not accuse me, I will not accuse you….'"}}
 
||
 
||
 
*The author implies that sexuality was involved in this polyandrous marriage.
 
*The author implies that sexuality was involved in this polyandrous marriage.
Line 573: Line 604:
 
|
 
|
 
====75====
 
====75====
−
||The Smith diary or ''History of the Church'' do not "give any hint of conjugal contacts Smith might have had with this wife."
+
||
 +
*It is noted that Joseph's diary and the ''History of the Church'' do not "give any hint of conjugal contacts Smith might have had with this wife."
 
||
 
||
 
*There is no evidence ''anywhere'' for any conjungal contact.  The author has repeatedly mentioned that a given event is not recorded in the ''History of the Church'', and so can here imply that there ''might be'' evidence of "conjugal contacts," but the Smith diary and ''History'' are hiding it.  There is no evidence, period.
 
*There is no evidence ''anywhere'' for any conjungal contact.  The author has repeatedly mentioned that a given event is not recorded in the ''History of the Church'', and so can here imply that there ''might be'' evidence of "conjugal contacts," but the Smith diary and ''History'' are hiding it.  There is no evidence, period.

Revision as of 07:24, 19 March 2009


Chapter 1
A FAIR Analysis of:
Criticism of Mormonism/Books
A work by author: George D. Smith
 Chapter 2 (pp. 108-255)

Claims made in "Chapter 2"

Page Claim Response Author's sources

53
  • Referring again to the Whitney letter, the author notes that Joseph "recommended his friend, whose seventeen-year-old daughter he had just married, should 'come a little a head, and nock…at the window.'"
  • Smith, Letter to "Brother and Sister [Newel K.] Whitney, and &c.," Nauvoo, Illinois, Aug. 18, 1842, LDS Church Archives, Salt Lake City.

Whitney "love letter" (edit)

Ages of wives (edit)

  • See also ch. Preface: ix
  • See also ch. 1: 1, 22, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 44
  • See also ch. 2: 53
  • See also ch. 2a: 142-143
  • See also ch. 3: 198
  • See also ch. 6: 408

53
  •  Author's quote: The prophet then poured out his heart, writing to his newest wife: "My feelings are so strong for you…now is the time to afford me succour….I know it is the will of God that you should comfort me now."
  • Whitney letter, Aug. 18, 1842.

Whitney "love letter" (edit)

53
  •  Author's quote: "Emma Hale, Joseph's wife of fifteen years, had left his side just twenty-four hours earlier. Now Joseph declared that he was "lonesome," and he pleaded with Sarah Ann to visit him under cover of darkness. After all, they had been married just three weeks earlier.
  • Whitney letter, Aug. 18, 1842.

Whitney "love letter" (edit)

54
  •  Author's quote: “Did Sarah Ann keep this rendezvous on that humid summer night? Unfortunately, the documentary record is silent.” But “the letter survives to illuminate the complexity of Smith’s life in Nauvoo."
  • No source provided.

Whitney "love letter" (edit)

54
  • The author states that what interested him the most was how Joseph "went about courting…these women."
  • No source provided.

Womanizing & romance (edit)

55
  • It is claimed that when polygamy was officially abandoned in 1890, that "what previously had been called 'celestial marriage' was subtly redefined to specify something new: marriage performed in LDS temples for this life and for an expected eternal afterlife."
  • No source provided.

Necessary for salvation? (edit)

  • See also ch. Preface: xiv
  • See also ch. 1: 6
  • See also ch. 2: 55
  • See also ch. 6: 356

55
  • Plural marriage is claimed to have originally been a "key principle" of exaltation, "but by adaption, celestial marriage was still said to be required, only now it meant monogamy rather than polygamy."

Necessary for salvation? (edit)

  • See also ch. Preface: xiv
  • See also ch. 1: 6
  • See also ch. 2: 55
  • See also ch. 6: 356

55
  •  Author's quote: "Despite his crowded daily schedule, the prophet interrupted other activities for secret liaisons with women and girls…."
  • No source provided.

Womanizing & romance (edit)

55
  • The author notes that Joseph "assured the women and their families that such unions were not only sanctioned but were demanded by heaven and fulfilled the ethereal principle of 'restoration.'"
  • No source provided.

56
  • The author assumes that "[t]here may have been even more wives and plural children."
  • No source provided.

Fallacy of probability (edit)

  • See also ch. 2: 56
  • See also ch. 2a: 111

57
  • The author notes that History of the Church says nothing about Nauvoo on the day of Louisa Beaman's marriage to Joseph.
  • No source provided.

Censorship of Church History (edit)

63
  •  Author's quote: "As will be seen, conjugal visits appear furtive and constantly shadowed by the threat of disclosure."
  • This is pure assumption on the part of the author—he provides no such evidence save his repeated distortion of the Whitney letter.
  • No source provided.

Whitney "love letter" (edit)

65
  •  Author's quote: “when Joseph requested that Sarah Ann Whitney visit him and ‘nock at the window,’ he reassured his new young wife that Emma would not be there, telegraphing his fear of discovery if Emma happened upon his trysts.”
  • No citation given
  •  History unclear or in error

Whitney "love letter" (edit)

65
  • The author claims that "[o]ne of the instrumental people in the inauguration of plural marriage was John [C.] Bennett…."
  • A huge leap, presuming that Bennett's adulteries were ever sanctioned by Joseph, or had anything to do with plural marriage.
  • John C. Bennett
  • Author's opinion.

John C. Bennett (edit)

65
  • The author notes that in 1841, John C. Bennett was Joseph Smith's "closest confident."  [ATTENTION!]
  • Ignores that Joseph began to distrust him for cause long before their public rupture.
  • John C. Bennett
  • No source provided.

John C. Bennett (edit)

65
  • It is claimed that Joseph was "sharing power" with Bennett.
  • Bennett's power was mainly secular. He did little in the religious realm. Joseph had wanted to be relieved of temporal responsibilities, and Bennett was available.
  • John C. Bennett
  • No source provided.

John C. Bennett (edit)

65
  • It is claimed that in 1842, John C. Bennett spoke out against Joseph "and was soon stripped of his offices and titles."
  • Bennett was guilty of serial immoralities, and had been disciplined on multiple occasions. He only "spoke out" once he learned that he was to be stripped of membership in the Church.
  • The author has cause and effect reversed, perhaps because he doesn't want us to know of the overwhelming evidence of Bennett's guilt.
  • John C. Bennett
  • No source provided.

John C. Bennett (edit)

65
  • It is claimed that John C. Bennett and Joseph each "accused the other of immoral behavior."
  • Bennett was accused by far more people, over a far greater length of time, of "immoral behavior." Many of his accusers were not LDS and had nothing to do with the Mormons.
  • Bennett only began to accuse Joseph once his own crimes were repeatedly revealed.
  • John C. Bennett
  • No source provided.

John C. Bennett (edit)

65
  • The author attempts to rehabilitate John C. Bennett by claiming: "While some of his claims may have been exaggerations, much of what he reported can be confirmed by other eyewitness accounts."
  • Many of Bennett's claims are clearly false.
  • The author uses Bennett uncritically, and naively.
  • The things which Bennett can "confirm" are mostly things like names of people Joseph married.
  • Bennett also clearly forged some material from others.
  • John C. Bennett
  • No source provided.

John C. Bennett (edit)

65
  • Yet more attempt to make Bennett a credible witness: "Even though his statements must be weighed critically, he cannot be merely dismissed as an unfriendly source who fabricated scandal."
  • The author never does this weighing for us.
  • Much of what he writes, after analysis, must be dismissed as fabrication or exaggeration, however.
  • Even anti-Mormon authors warned of Bennett's problems:
"There is, no doubt, much truth in Bennett's book…but no statement that he makes can be received with confidence."[1]
  • Author's opinion.

John C. Bennett (edit)

65
  • The author claims that "Bennett had an ambitious but colorful background."
  • This hides a mountain of evidence about Bennett's pre-LDS behavior, including:
    • repeatedly using others' names to fraudulently support the establishment of medical colleges
    • selling bogus medical diplomas
    • selling bogus diplomas in other fields (e.g., law)
    • lying and misrepresentation
    • serial adulteries and infidelities
    • abandonment of wife and children
  • John C. Bennett
  • No source provided

John C. Bennett (edit)

66-67
  •  Author's quote: "Writing on March 23, 1846, Bennett claimed to have known 'Joseph better than any other man living for at least fourteen months!'….Bennett was well positioned to know all about any behind-the-scenes transactions.
  • The author here accepts Bennett uncritically.
  • Despite his claim, he was never part of the inner circle which received the highest temple ordinances introduced by Joseph. Bennett and Rigdon "were conspicuously absent" when Joseph Smith spoke to those who would be among the first to receive the full endowment necessary "to finish their work and prevent imposition" by Satan.
  • Bennett had secular influence, but relatively little to do with religious matters in Nauvoo:
"Thus, the considerable embarrassment to Joseph Smith and Mormonism which some have inferred from Bennett's alleged duping of the Mormons is cast in a new light because Bennett himself so effectively refutes his own claim that he was a close confidant of Joseph Smith. Unwittingly, Bennett indisputably demonstrates that he was neither directly involved with the endowment, eternal marriage, nor plural marriage—the most significant private theological developments during Bennett's stay in Nauvoo.[2]
  • Smith, Saintly Scoundrel, 56.

John C. Bennett (edit)

68
  • The author claims that Joseph is merely “feigning impartiality” before going on to practice “undemocratic block voting.”
  • Block voting is not undemocratic—many interest groups vote en masse for candidates which will meet their needs.
  • Joseph was not feigning when he said, "We care not a fig for a Whig or Democrat….We shall go for our friends." (p. 68) He was indicating that party made no difference to the Saints; what mattered is who would agree to defend them.
  • Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Loaded and prejudicial language
  • No source provided.

Bloc voting (edit)

  • See also ch. 1: 2
  • See also ch. 2: 68
  • See also ch. 4: 292–293

See NOTE on bloc voting

69
  • The author notes that Joseph was apparently "undeterred" by reports of a negative assessment of Bennett, and proceeded to name him Assistant President of the Church.
  • Joseph knew from personal experience that "it is no uncommon thing for good men to be evil spoken against," and did nothing precipitous.
  • The accusations against Bennett gained credence when Joseph learned of his attempts to persuade a young woman "that he intended to marry her." Joseph dispatched Hyrum Smith and William Law to make inquiries, and in early July 1841 he learned that Bennett had a wife and children living in the east. Non-LDS sources confirmed Bennett's infidelity: one noted that he "heard it from almost every person in town that [his wife] left him in consequence of his ill treatment of her home and his intimacy with other women." Another source reported that Bennett's wife "declared that she could no longer live with him…it would be the seventh family that he had parted during their union."
  • John C. Bennett
  • No source provided.

John C. Bennett (edit)

69
  • It is noted that John C. Bennett was Assistant President of the Church.
  • Sidney Rigdon, a counselor in the First Presidency, was frequently ill. On April 8, "John C. Bennett was presented, with the First Presidency, as Assistant President until President Rigdon's health should be restored." Modern readers should be cautious in projecting the role of the current First Presidency on Joseph's day. In the modern Church, the First Presidency is almost always composed of two apostles who have extensive experience in ecclesiastical affairs called to serve with the President. In Joseph's day, this was not the case. Most of Joseph's counselors in the First Presidency were to betray his trust, including Jesse Gause, Frederick G. Williams, Sidney Rigdon, William Law and John C. Bennett. While some of these counselors received keys, Bennett did not. None were apostles prior to their call.
  • John C. Bennett
  • Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Presentism
  • No source provided.

John C. Bennett (edit)

69
  • It is claimed that John C. Bennett had religious influence by being Assistant President of the Church.
  • [This is not stated baldly, but some readers might be confused.]
  • With few exceptions, Bennett "played little role in church conferences. There might have been an unofficial division of labor between Bennett and Smith. Smith handled church affairs; Bennett took the lead in secular matters."
  • John C. Bennett
  • No source provided.

John C. Bennett (edit)

70
  • The author claims that Joseph Smith and John C. Bennett remained confidants until about March the next year (1842)
  • Bennett was confronted with the charges mentioned above in the summer of 1841.
  • When confronted with these charges, Bennett broke down and confessed. Emma's nephew, Lorenzo D. Wasson, claimed to have been upstairs and heard Joseph "give J. C. Bennett a tremendous flagellation for practicing iniquity under the base pretence of authority from the heads of the church." Claiming to be mortified at the idea of public censure, Bennett took poison in a suicide gesture, but recovered.
  • John C. Bennett
  • No source provided.
  •  History unclear or in error

John C. Bennett (edit)

70
  • It is claimed that there seemed to be "no office or honor within reach that Smith did not hasten to grant to Bennett."
  • This is false: Bennett was never inducted into the "Quorum of the Anointed"—those who were receiving the temple endowment from Joseph (see above, 66-67).
  • He was also never made an apostle.
  • John C. Bennett
  •  History unclear or in error
  • No source provided.

John C. Bennett (edit)

70
  •  Author's quote: "Zina Huntington, who married Henry Jacobs instead but then reconsidered seven months later in response to Joseph's restated interest."
  • No source provided.

70-71
  •  Author's quote: "Seemingly impatient, Joseph soon after married Zina's sister, Presendia, who was also already married."
  • No source provided.

71
  • The author notes that "Bennett alleged that during the summer and fall of 1841, Smith made unsuccessful advances toward Apostle Orson Pratt's wife, Sarah."
  • The author does not tell us that Sarah and Bennett were probably having an affair, as witnessed by LDS and non-LDS witnesses, and a plausible time-line.
  • John C. Bennett
  • No source provided.

John C. Bennett (edit)

71
  • It is notes that "[w]hatever the accuracy of the quotes [i.e., Bennett's claims] the two men [Orson and Joseph] quarrelled…."
  • The author here avoids the necessity of dealing with the problems in Bennett's account.
  • John C. Bennett
  • No source provided.

71
  •  Author's quote: "…the important aspect of this incident is that it tells us less about Bennett's motive in recalling this dispute and more about Orson's willingness to support his wife over his religious leader…."
  • "Recalling" assumes that Bennett's account is truthful, and not fabricated. This has not been demonstrated.
  • John C. Bennett

John C. Bennett (edit)

71
  • The author concludes that Joseph believe that Sarah Pratt "had been wrong to reject him—and that she had failed the test. The defiance she exhibited ultimately led to alienation with her husband…."
  • The author again says nothing about Sarah and Bennett's affair, which probably had something to do with her "alienation."
  • John C. Bennett
  • No source provided.

John C. Bennett (edit)

72
  • The author notes that Orson Pratt eventually accepted Joseph's explanation "that he merely wanted to test Sarah's obedience, and was not seriously courting this married woman."
  • The author does not tell us that Orson eventually believed Sarah and Bennett had misled him, saying he was first informed by "a wicked source, from those disaffected, but as soon as he learned the truth he was satisfied."[3] He presents no evidence for what explanation Joseph gave Orson, or what Orson believed.
  • John C. Bennett
  • No source provided.

72
  •  Author's quote: "Meanwhile, Bennett seems to have followed his leader in courting several women himself."
  • The author is here presuming that Bennett imitated Joseph.
  • Bennett was also involved in operating a prostitution ring and house of ill repute in Nauvoo.[4]
  • John C. Bennett
  • No source provided

John C. Bennett (edit)

72
  • The author claims that John C. Bennett resigned from the church on May 17, 1842.
  •  History unclear or in error: In fact, Bennett was forced to resign by Joseph, who wrote to the Church recorder: "be so good as to permit Bennett to withdraw his name from the Church record, if he desires to do so, and this with the best of feelings towards…General Bennett."[5]
  • John C. Bennett
  • Andrew Smith, Saintly Scoundrel, 86–89. (Note that The author does not properly represent the source's contents.)

John C. Bennett (edit)

72
  • It is claimed that Bennett was excommunicated from the Church in "retaliation."
  • This was not in retaliation, since Joseph had pushed for Bennett's resignation.
  • A high council trial of Chauncey Higbee concluded on May 24, at which it became clear that Higbee had been seducing women under Bennett's direction.
  • Bennett was told that his withdrawal from the Church would be made public. Bennett once more begged for mercy, claiming that public exposure would distress his mother.[6] Joseph again deferred a public announcement, and Bennett would soon also make confession to the Nauvoo Masonic Lodge. Weeping, Bennett pleaded for leniency, with Joseph as his advocate.[7] Even Joseph's patience had an end, however. It soon became clear that still other members had used Bennett's arguments to seduce women—his excommunication was made public on 15 June. The Masonic Lodge published Bennett's crimes the next day.[8] His Nauvoo reputation in tatters, Bennett left and began plotting his revenge.
  • John C. Bennett
  •  History unclear or in error
  • Andrew Smith, Saintly Scoundrel, 86–89.

John C. Bennett (edit)

72
  • John C. Bennett claimed that his excommunication was postdated to May 11 to appear that it had occurred before his resignation.
  • See also ch. 2a: 119
(The author later acts as if this claim of Bennett's is established fact.)
  • The author mischaracterizes his source, and does not tell us that Bennett's claim was false. Bennett's biographer wrote:
"On May 11 Smith and several others signed a statement to disfellowship Bennett….
"According to Bennett, three of the signatories were not in Nauvoo on that date….
"[However] William Law, one of the signatories…testified that he signed it on the evening of May 11. Some four or five days later Law had a conversation with Bennett 'and intimated to him that such a thing was concluded upon.'…The best explanation for this matter is that Joseph Smith had the disfellowship document drawn up on May 11 Those who were in Nauvoo were asked to sign it….As others returned to the city, they added their names." (Andrew Smith, Saintly Scoundrel, 86, 100).
  • Andrew Smith, Saintly Scoundrel, 86–89.

John C. Bennett (edit)

73
  • The author claims that up until early 1842, Joseph Smith and John C. Bennett "seemed to be on good terms."
  • No source provided.

John C. Bennett (edit)

73
  •  Author's quote: "It is entirely plausible that Bennett was then privy to Smith's domestic matters."
  • The author wants to rehabilitate Bennett as a source, while glossing over the problems.
  • John C. Bennett
  • No source provided.

John C. Bennett (edit)

73
  • The author notes that "[i]n the spring of 1842, the two men quarreled and Smith had Bennett excommunicated…."
  • Joseph and Bennett did not "quarrel"—evidence of further seduction and infidelity by Bennett came to light.
  • Bennett was given the chance to resign, and did so.
  • Further disclosure to the high council led to Bennett's exposure and excommunication.
  • John C. Bennett
  • No source provided.

John C. Bennett (edit)

75
  • Zina and Henry Jacobs "were apparently willing to let the prophet insinuate himself into their marriage."
  • No source provided.

75
  •  Author's quote: "In the context of having just married a pregnant wife, [Joseph's] words acquire added meaning: 'If you will not accuse me, I will not accuse you….'"
  • The author implies that sexuality was involved in this polyandrous marriage.
  • He tries to prejudice the reader by pointing out that Zina was pregnant when she and Henry approved her sealing to Joseph.
  • Full details: Wyatt, "Zina and Her Men."
  • History of the Church 4:445.

75
  • It is noted that Joseph's diary and the History of the Church do not "give any hint of conjugal contacts Smith might have had with this wife."
  • There is no evidence anywhere for any conjungal contact. The author has repeatedly mentioned that a given event is not recorded in the History of the Church, and so can here imply that there might be evidence of "conjugal contacts," but the Smith diary and History are hiding it. There is no evidence, period.
  • Censorship_and_revision_of_LDS_history
  • Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Censorship
  • No source provided.

Censorship of Church History (edit)

75

 When [Henry] Jacobs returned in June [1844] "he found Zina accompanying Joseph to private meetings involving Masonic-like handshakes, oaths, and special clothing."
  • MORE…. Zina D.H. Young, Journal, "June 5, 6, 7, 8, 9," 1844, Zina Card Brown Collection; see Bradley and Woodward, Four Zinas, 124.
  • CHECK THIS SOURCE!!

77

 "Even though Zina was pregnant with Henry's child when she married Joseph, the theology of 'sealing' meant that in the next life she and her children would be Joseph's 'eternal possessions,' unconnected to Henry. The author gives no evidence for this. It may be that some early sealings (especially polyandrous ones) were intended to bind families to each and Joseph in salvation in the next world.
  • No source provided.

Sealing takes away families? (edit)

  • See also ch. 2: 77
  • See also ch. 3: 234

77

 "Some sources say [Brigham] Young advised [Henry Jacobs] to find a wife who could be his eternal partner."
  • This from a single source (not "sources") and comes from a virulently anti-Mormon work, William Hall, Abominations of Mormonism Exposed (Cincinnati: I. Hart & Co., 1852), 43–44.
  • Besides being hostile, this source has numerous problems which make it implausible.
  • Full details: Wyatt, "Zina and Her Men."
  • No source provided.

77

 Henry's subsequent life is not discussed by Smith, perhaps because it would provide insight into why Zina chose to remain with Brigham.
  • No source provided.

78

 "Brigham explained that 'if a woman can find a man holding the keys of the priesthood with higher power and authority than her husband, and he is disposed to take her, he can do so, otherwise she has got to remain where she is. In either of these ways of sep[a]ration, you can discover, there is no need for a bill of divorcement."
  • The author omits key parts of Brigham's recorded discourse: "…if a man magnifies his priesthood, observing faithfully his covenants to the end of his life, all the wives and children sealed to him, all the blessings and honors promised to him in his ordinations and sealing blessings are immutably and eternally fixed; no power can wrench them from his possession. You may inquire, in case a wife becomes disaffected with her husband, her affections lost, she becomes alienated from him and wishes to be the wife of another, can she not leave him? I know of no law in heaven or on earth by which she can be made free while her husband remains faithful and magnifies his priesthood before God and he is not disposed to put her away, she having done nothing worthy of being put away."
  • Brigham Young 8 October 1861 discourse on plural marriage
  • Full details: Wyatt, "Zina and Her Men."
  • Brigham Young, "A few words of Doctrine," Oct 8, 1861, LDS Archives.

Brigham Young's 8 October 1861 talk (edit)

  • See also ch. 2: 78
  • See also ch. 8: 541

79

 Presendia Buell "displayed an affinity for mystical religious experiences as one of the women who began speaking and singing in tongues…."
  • No source provided.

Presendia Buell (edit)

79

 Presendia "did not take the prophet's advice [to leave for Illinois while he was in Liberty Jail] prior to his escape from jail on April 16. Nine months later, on January 31, 1841, she gave birth to a son Oliver. Later that year [she went to Illinois]….."
  • The main text clearly implies that Joseph was the father of Prescendia's son Norman. Else, why mention that "nine months later" she had a child, with no further comment?
  • Smith disguises the fact that DNA evidence has proved that Oliver was not Joseph's son.
  • Joseph Smith and polygamy/Children of polygamous marriages
  • Gregory L. Smith, A review of Nauvoo Polygamy:...but we called it celestial marriage by George D. Smith. FARMS Review, Vol. 20, Issue 2. (Detailed book review)

Presendia Buell (edit)

80 n. 63

 Fawn Brodie pointed out that Oliver was born at least a year after Presendia's husband left the church and that Oliver had the angular features and high forehead of the Smith line (No Man Knows, 2989ff, 301, 460).[Note continues below]
  • See left column

80 n. 63

 [Continued from above] Compton considered it improbable that Joseph and Presendia would have found time together during the brief window opportunity after his release from prison in Missouri (Sacred Loneliness, 670, 673)."[Note continues below]
  • See left column

Presendia Buell (edit)

80 n. 63

[Note continued from above]"….There is no DNA connection (Carrie A. Moore, “DNA tests rule out 2 as Smith descendants,” Deseret Morning News, 10 November 2007). Compton does find it 'unlikely, though not impossible, that Joseph Smith was the actual father of' John Hiram, Presendia's seventh chld [check spelling] during her marriage to Buell and born in November 1843 (Sacred Loneliness, 124, 670–71)."

  • See left column

Presendia Buell (edit)

81

 "Occasionally, as King David did with Uriah the Hittite, Smith sent the husband [of potential polyandrous marriage partners] away on a mission which provided the privacy needed for a plural relationship to flower."
  • Unmentioned—but perhaps not unimplied—is the fact that David had already committed adultery with Bathsheba, and sought to have her husband killed so he could marry her (see 2 Samuel 11). This metaphor imputes motives to Joseph where no textual evidence exists.
  • Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Mind reading
  • Gregory L. Smith, A review of Nauvoo Polygamy:...but we called it celestial marriage by George D. Smith. FARMS Review, Vol. 20, Issue 2. (Detailed book review)
  • No source provided.

81

 "This [see above] applied to Zina…."
  • Henry Jacobs was present at the sealing to Zina. Henry knew of Joseph's plural proposal to Joseph before their marriage.
  •  Internal contradiction: compare p. 75
  • Zina and Henry Jacobs
  • Full details: Wyatt, "Zina and Her Men."
  • No source provided.

82

 "The History of the Church makes no mention of the second Huntington nuptial…."
  • No source provided.

Censorship of Church History (edit)

82

 a Buell child being sealed to a proxy for Joseph with “wording [that] hints that it might have been Smith’s child….It is not clear…which of her children it might have been."
  • Oliver Huntington Journal, Nov 14, 1884, USHS; see Compton, In Sacred Loneliness, 140, 673.

84

 "From the inception of plural marriage, Smith demanded confidentiality from those whom he taught the principle."
  • History of the Church 4:479; Woodruff Journals 2:143.

Hiding polygamy (edit)

  • See also ch. 1: 3-4 and 51
  • See also ch. 4: 247

85

 "…Smith evidently adapted and redefined [elements] from the Masonic rituals and incorporated [them] as part of the unfolding Mormon temple ceremonies."
  • No source given.

85

 "The [temple] vows of secrecy and threats of blood penalties intensified the mysterious rites of celestial marriage…."
  • There are no "blood penalties" associated with plural marriage.
  • Note the prejudicial language, in which the author tries to make the endowment seem foreign, strange and alienating.
  • Author's opinion.

Temple (edit)

  • See also ch. 2: 75 and 85
  • See also ch. 2a: 114

88

 "There is no mention of [Joseph's sealing to Agnes Smith] in the History of the Church."
  • No source provided.

Censorship of Church History (edit)

92

 Sarah Pratt reported in 1886 that Lucinda had told her nearly forty-five years earlier in 1842: "Why[,] I am his [Smith's] mistress since four years."
  • Compton notes that this statement is "antagonistic, third-hand, and late" (In Sacred Loneliness, 650). It seems implausible that Harris would admit to being a "mistress."
  • Newel and Avery, Mormon Enigma, 346 have likewise seen the "mistress" label as "an embellishment by either Sarah Pratt or W. Wyl."
  • The author provides none of this perspective.
  • Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Loaded and prejudicial language
  • Wyl, Mormon Portraits, 60.

Lucinda Harris (edit)

  • See also ch. 1: 33 and 44
  • See also ch. 2: 92

99

 "As usual, the History of the Church made no mention of Sylvia [Sessions Lyon] on February 8, 1842…."
  • No source provided.

Censorship of Church History (edit)

100

 "During these years as Windsor's wife, Sylvia reportedly bore Smith a child in 1844…."
  • G. D. Smith ignores Brian C. Hales, “The Joseph Smith–Sylvia Sessions Plural Sealing: Polyandry or Polygyny?” Mormon Historical Studies 9/1 (Spring 2008): 41–57, which argues that Sylvia considered herself divorced prior to marrying Joseph polygamously, contrary to evidence misread by Compton.
  • Joseph_Smith_and_polygamy/Children_of_polygamous_marriages

103

 "Typically, [Joseph] never mentioned his marriage to Patty [Sessions] on paper…."
  • No source provided.

Censorship of Church History (edit)

105

 Sarah Cleveland's husband "was a Swedenborgian, embracing a world view compatible with that of Mormons."
  • These needs more argument than Smith gives it. It is not clear how being a Swedenborgian would predispose Cleveland to accept a modern prophet, new scripture, and restored priesthood authority (for example).
  • Surely any world-view was somewhat compatible with the Mormons', but what about Cleveland's views were more compatible than, say, other Christians?
  • Swedenborg_and_three_degrees_of_glory
  • Biography of Sarah Maryetta Kingsley, LDS Archives.

106

 "John Cleveland's Swedenborgian faith might have helped prepare Sarah for some of Joseph's teachings. Like Smith, followers of Emanuel Swedenborg conceived of a pre-existent life, 'eternal marriage' for couples who had a true 'affinity' for each other, and a three-tiered heaven that required marriage for admission to the highest level."
  • Three degrees in heaven is a Biblical notion, it did not originate with Swedenborg or Joseph Smith.
  • It is not clear what Swedenborg's "affinity" between spouses has to do with LDS plural marriage.
  • Swedenborg_and_three_degrees_of_glory
  • Author's speculation.
  • Emanuel Swedenborg, Heaven and Hell, trans. George F. Dole (West Chester, Pa.: Swedenborg Foundation, 2002), 18–32.
  • CHECK THIS SOURCE! [needs work]

106

 "John [Cleveland]'s continued willingness to host LDS events indicated a likely compatibility of beliefs."
  • There are other options:
    • Perhaps Cleveland was simply a tolerant man?
    • Perhaps he respected the Mormons for what he had seen of them personally?
    • Perhaps he respected his wife's desire to practice her own faith, despite not sharing it.
  • No source provided.

106

 "Like some of the other husbands of women who agreed to marry the prophet, John Cleveland nevertheless became 'more and more bitter towards the Mormons.'"
  • The author does not tell the reader that this difficulty did not occur until after Joseph's death, and the Saints had gone west. He neglects to point out that Compton noted that even six months before Joseph's death, Sarah's husband was "very friendly and frequently visited the Prophet." (Compton, In Sacred Loneliness, 281).
  • Thus, the implication that Joseph's plural marriage caused problems for Cleveland is not sustained by the evidence.
  • The author also does not tell us that one version of Sarah's decision to remain behind instead of going to Utah reads:
"Brigham Young and council…counciled her to stay with her Husband as he was a good man, having shown himself kind ever helping those in need, although for some reason his mind was darkened as to the Gospel. She obey[ed] the council and stayed with her Husband, and was faithfull and true to her religion and died a faithfull member of the Church…." (Compton, In Sacred Loneliness, 283).
  • Sarah Cleveland to August Lyman, 1847, John Lyman Smith Collection, L. Tom Perry Special Collections, cited by Compton, In Sacred Loneliness, 284.

106

 Besides Cleveland (see above) other polyandrous husbands became more bitter against the Church.
  • As shown above, Cleveland was not bitter about the Church or Joseph during Joseph's lifetime.
  • No other examples are given. It is not clear to whom the author is referring.
  • Joseph_Smith_and_polyandry/Book_chapter
  • No source provided.

Endnotes

  1. [note]  T. B. H. Stenhouse, The Rocky Mountain Saints : A Full and Complete History of the Mormons.... (New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1878 [1873]), 184 note.
  2. [note]  Andrew F. Ehat, "Joseph Smith's Introduction of Temple Ordinances and the 1844 Mormon Succession Question," (Master's Thesis, Brigham Young University, 1981), 40.
  3. [note]  George L. Mitton and Rhett S. James, "A Response to D. Michael Quinn's Homosexual Distortion of Latter-Day Saint History," FARMS Review of Books 10/1 (1998): footnote 70, citing T. Edgar Lyon, "Orson Pratt—Early Mormon Leader," (M.A. diss., University of Chicago, 1932), 31. See also Millennial Star 40 (16 December 1878): 788.
  4. [note] Richard L. Bushman, Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling (New York: Knopf, 2005), 411.
  5. [note]  Bennett, History of the Saints, 40–41.
  6. [note]  Joseph Smith, History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 7 volumes, edited by Brigham H. Roberts, (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1957). Volume 5 link
  7. [note]  Smith, History of the Church, 5:18 (26 May 1842).
  8. [note]  Richard L. Bushman, Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling (New York: Knopf, 2005), 461.; see Times and Seasons 3/15 (15 June 1842): 830; Smith, History of the Church, 5:32.

Further reading

Template code Inserts this reference Click to edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: 8: The Mormon Proposition}} To learn more box:responses to: 8: The Mormon Proposition edit
{{To learn more box:''Under the Banner of Heaven''}} To learn more about responses to: Under the Banner of Heaven edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Robert Price}} To learn more about responses to: Robert Price edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Ankerberg and Weldon}} To learn more about responses to: Ankerberg and Weldon edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Ashamed of Joseph}} To learn more about responses to: Ashamed of Joseph edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Beckwith and Moser}} To learn more about responses to: Beckwith and Moser edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Beckwith and Parrish}} To learn more about responses to: Beckwith and Parrish edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Benjamin Park}} To learn more about responses to: Benjamin Park edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Bible versus Joseph Smith}} To learn more about responses to: Bible versus Joseph Smith edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Bible versus Book of Mormon}} To learn more about responses to: Bible versus Book of Mormon edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: ''Big Love''}} To learn more about responses to: Big Love edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Brett Metcalfe}} To learn more about responses to: Brett Metcalfe edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Bill Maher}} To learn more about responses to: Bill Maher edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Bruce H. Porter}} To learn more about responses to: Bruce H. Porter edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Carol Wang Shutter}} To learn more about responses to: Carol Wang Shutter edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: CES Letter}} To learn more about responses to: CES Letter edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Charles Larson}} To learn more about responses to: Charles Larson edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Christopher Nemelka}} To learn more about responses to: Christopher Nemelka edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Colby Townshed}} To learn more about responses to: Colby Townshed edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Contender Ministries}} To learn more about responses to: Contender Ministries edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Crane and Crane}} To learn more about responses to: Crane and Crane edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: D. Michael Quinn}} To learn more about responses to: D. Michael Quinn edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Dan Vogel}} To learn more about responses to: Dan Vogel edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: David John Buerger}} To learn more about responses to: David John Buerger edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: David Persuitte}} To learn more about responses to: David Persuitte edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Denver Snuffer}} To learn more about responses to: Denver Snuffer edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Dick Bauer}} To learn more about responses to: Dick Bauer edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Duwayne R Anderson}} To learn more about responses to: Duwayne R Anderson edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Earl Wunderli}} To learn more about responses to: Earl Wunderli edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Ed Decker}} To learn more about responses to: Ed Decker edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Erikson and Giesler}} To learn more about responses to: Erikson and Giesler edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Ernest Taves}} To learn more about responses to: Ernest Taves edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Fawn Brodie}} To learn more about responses to: Fawn Brodie edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: George D Smith}} To learn more about responses to: George D Smith edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Grant Palmer}} To learn more about responses to: Grant Palmer edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Hank Hanegraaff}} To learn more about responses to: Hank Hanegraaff edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Hurlbut-Howe}} To learn more about responses to: Hurlbut-Howe edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: James Brooke}} To learn more about responses to: James Brooke edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: James Spencer}} To learn more about responses to: James Spencer edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: James White}} To learn more about responses to: James White edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Jerald and Sandra Tanner}} To learn more about responses to: Jerald and Sandra Tanner edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Jesus Christ-Joseph Smith or Search for the Truth DVD}} To learn more about responses to: Jesus Christ-Joseph Smith or Search for the Truth DVD edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: John Dehlin}} To learn more about responses to: John Dehlin edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Jonathan Neville}} To learn more about responses to: Jonathan Neville edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Kurt Van Gorden}} To learn more about responses to: Kurt Van Gorden edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Laura King Newell and Valeen Tippetts Avery}} To learn more about responses to: Laura King Newell and Valeen Tippetts Avery edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Loftes Tryk aka Lofte Payne}} To learn more about responses to: Loftes Tryk aka Lofte Payne edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Luke WIlson}} To learn more about responses to: Luke WIlson edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Marquardt and Walters}} To learn more about responses to: Marquardt and Walters edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Martha Beck}} To learn more about responses to: Martha Beck edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Mcgregor Ministries}} To learn more about responses to: Mcgregor Ministries edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: McKeever and Johnson}} To learn more about responses to: McKeever and Johnson edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: New Approaches}} To learn more about responses to: New Approaches to the Book of Mormon edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Richard Abanes}} To learn more about responses to: Richard Abanes edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Richard Van Wagoner}} To learn more about responses to: Richard Van Wagoner edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Richard and Joan Ostling}} To learn more about responses to: Richard and Joan Ostling edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Rick Grunger}} To learn more about responses to: Rick Grunger edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Robert Ritner}} To learn more about responses to: Robert Ritner edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Rod Meldrum}} To learn more about responses to: Rod Meldrum edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Roger I Anderson}} To learn more about responses to: Roger I Anderson edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Ronald V. Huggins}} To learn more about responses to: Ronald V. Huggins edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Sally Denton}} To learn more about responses to: Sally Denton edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Simon Southerton}} To learn more about responses to: Simon Southerton edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Thomas Murphy}} To learn more about responses to: Thomas Murphy edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Todd Compton}} To learn more about responses to: Todd Compton edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Vernal Holley}} To learn more about responses to: Vernal Holley edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Walter Martin}} To learn more about responses to: Walter Martin edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Wesley Walters}} To learn more about responses to: Wesley Walters edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Will Bagley}} To learn more about responses to: Will Bagley edit
Retrieved from "https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/index.php?title=Criticism_of_Mormonism/Books/Nauvoo_Polygamy/Chapter_2&oldid=39497"