Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Nauvoo Polygamy/Chapter 7"

m (→‎429)
m
Line 61: Line 61:
  
 
====438–439====
 
====438–439====
−
||G.D. Smith follows William Law's claims about Joseph mismanaging or defrauding the Lawrence estate.
+
||The author follows William Law's claims about Joseph mismanaging or defrauding the Lawrence estate.
 
||
 
||
−
*G.D. Smith completely ignores the primary documents on this issue, and relies only on Law's hostile, and demonstrably false, account.
+
*The author completely ignores the primary documents on this issue, and relies only on Law's hostile, and demonstrably false, account.
 
**[[Joseph Smith and polygamy/Mismanagement of the Lawrence estate|Mismanagement of the Lawrence estate?]]
 
**[[Joseph Smith and polygamy/Mismanagement of the Lawrence estate|Mismanagement of the Lawrence estate?]]
 
*{{GDS-See also|3|196}}
 
*{{GDS-See also|3|196}}
Line 85: Line 85:
 
||William Clayton's "discussion of plural marriage was at once turned into a charge of having had 'unlawful intercourse with women.'"
 
||William Clayton's "discussion of plural marriage was at once turned into a charge of having had 'unlawful intercourse with women.'"
 
||
 
||
−
*{{InternalContradiction|G.D. Smith told us earlier only that in England Clayton "was personally suspected of ‘having had unlawful intercourse with women.’”  He said nothing about this being due only to Clayton's discussion of the matter.}}
+
*{{InternalContradiction|The author told us earlier only that in England Clayton "was personally suspected of ‘having had unlawful intercourse with women.’”  He said nothing about this being due only to Clayton's discussion of the matter.}}
 
*Smith still does not tell us, though, that the charge came from an “apostate Mormon,” whom Clayton claimed had maliciously distorted his words.
 
*Smith still does not tell us, though, that the charge came from an “apostate Mormon,” whom Clayton claimed had maliciously distorted his words.
 
*[[William Clayton and polygamy]]
 
*[[William Clayton and polygamy]]
Line 96: Line 96:
  
 
====446====
 
====446====
−
||G.D. Smith mentions that Andrew Jenson published about plural wives, only to have Wilford Woodruff complain about him having done so. G.D. Smith has continuously argued that the Church has striven to hide or suppress knowledge of polygamy.
+
||The author mentions that Andrew Jenson published about plural wives, only to have Wilford Woodruff complain about him having done so. The author has continuously argued that the Church has striven to hide or suppress knowledge of polygamy.
 
||
 
||
 
*He does not tell us that the reason Woodruff was worried was because at the time (1887) federal marshals were pursuing and jailing polygamists and their wives who refused to testify.  Woodruff was trying to keep members out of jail, not trying to suppress polygamy.
 
*He does not tell us that the reason Woodruff was worried was because at the time (1887) federal marshals were pursuing and jailing polygamists and their wives who refused to testify.  Woodruff was trying to keep members out of jail, not trying to suppress polygamy.
Line 140: Line 140:
 
||"One LDS educator in 1967 wrote about the 'causes' of conflict in Nauvoo…without mentioning plural marriage."
 
||"One LDS educator in 1967 wrote about the 'causes' of conflict in Nauvoo…without mentioning plural marriage."
 
||
 
||
−
*Contrary to G.D. Smith's claim, Godfrey's cited chapter is entitled "plural marriage," and he discusses it at length there and in his abstract and conclusion.
+
*Contrary to the author's claim, Godfrey's cited chapter is entitled "plural marriage," and he discusses it at length there and in his abstract and conclusion.
 
*[[Censorship_and_revision_of_LDS_history/LDS histories over many years omit plural marriage|LDS histories over many years omit plural marriage#Godfrey]]
 
*[[Censorship_and_revision_of_LDS_history/LDS histories over many years omit plural marriage|LDS histories over many years omit plural marriage#Godfrey]]
 
*[[../../Censorship]]
 
*[[../../Censorship]]

Revision as of 14:50, 26 December 2008


Chapter 6
A FAIR Analysis of:
Criticism of Mormonism/Books
A work by author: George D. Smith
 Chapter 8
Page Claim Response Author's sources

416

 "…the 1846 temple sealings, which re-comemorated previously conducted plural marriages, were carefully noted in Nauvoo temple records."
  • No source given.

Censorship of Church History (edit)

423

 In Nauvoo, Joseph "had appropriated church members' charitable donations for real estate speculation, buying low and selling high to those immigrants who could afford to pay."
  • Joseph had, in fact, signed a note for the land—thus going into debt himself. He sold land at variable prices, charging those who could afford more money so that he could give free or cheap land to the poor.
  • This is not land speculation.
  • Joseph Smith land speculation
  • Gregory L. Smith, A review of Nauvoo Polygamy:...but we called it celestial marriage by George D. Smith. FARMS Review, Vol. 20, Issue 2. (Detailed book review)
  • No source provided.

429

 "A friend of Nancy Rigdon, Francis had become concerned in 1842 over Smith's advances toward her."
  • the author fails to tell us that Francis was, in fact, Nancy's boyfriend and her suitor. He also neglects to mention that Francis had contracted a venereal disease from a prostitute, had been seducing women under John C. Bennett's tutelage, and may have engaged in a homosexual relationship with Bennett.
  • John C. Bennett
  • No source provided.

John C. Bennett (edit)

435

 "Dallin H. Oaks asserted that the 'abatement of newspapers publishing scandalous or provocative material' was not considered a violation of freedom of the press at the time….drawing no distinction between the destruction of a newspaper without a trial and a libel charge being tried in the courts."
  • The author's "reply" to Dallin Oaks is a non sequitur. Oaks (and Firmage and Magrum) demonstrate at length that both Illinois and U.S. law had ample precedent in case law and practice for the abatement of the Expositor.
  • If the author wishes to dispute the legal scholarship marshaled by Oaks' 40 page review, it deserves more than a dismissive footnote, and he ought to interact with Oaks' article, not a brief summary in a secondary source.[2]
  • Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Presentism#.22Freedom_of_the_press.22
  • Nauvoo Expositor
  • Edwin Brown Firmage and Richard Collin Mangrum, Zion in the Courts : a Legal History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1830–1900 (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1988), 112-13, 390n13 (Citing Oaks). ISBN 0252069803.

Nauvoo Expositor (edit)

  • See also ch. Preface: xii
  • See also ch. 4: 285
  • See also ch. 6: 408
  • See also ch. 7: 435

438–439

 The author follows William Law's claims about Joseph mismanaging or defrauding the Lawrence estate.
  • The author completely ignores the primary documents on this issue, and relies only on Law's hostile, and demonstrably false, account.
  • See also ch. 3: 196
  • Gregory L. Smith, A review of Nauvoo Polygamy:...but we called it celestial marriage by George D. Smith. FARMS Review, Vol. 20, Issue 2. (Detailed book review)
  • Cook, William Law, 120.

442

 "Instead of evaluating a difficult past in order not to repeat it, the church leadership tried to separate its troubles from their apparent causes."
  • No source provided.

445

 William Clayton's "discussion of plural marriage was at once turned into a charge of having had 'unlawful intercourse with women.'"
  •  Internal contradiction: The author told us earlier only that in England Clayton "was personally suspected of ‘having had unlawful intercourse with women.’” He said nothing about this being due only to Clayton's discussion of the matter.
  • Smith still does not tell us, though, that the charge came from an “apostate Mormon,” whom Clayton claimed had maliciously distorted his words.
  • William Clayton and polygamy
  • Gregory L. Smith, A review of Nauvoo Polygamy:...but we called it celestial marriage by George D. Smith. FARMS Review, Vol. 20, Issue 2. (Detailed book review)
  • Smith, Intimate Chronicle, xlix-l.

William Clayton (edit)

446

 The author mentions that Andrew Jenson published about plural wives, only to have Wilford Woodruff complain about him having done so. The author has continuously argued that the Church has striven to hide or suppress knowledge of polygamy.
  • He does not tell us that the reason Woodruff was worried was because at the time (1887) federal marshals were pursuing and jailing polygamists and their wives who refused to testify. Woodruff was trying to keep members out of jail, not trying to suppress polygamy.
  • Wilford Woodruff criticizes publication of polygamists
  • Gregory L. Smith, A review of Nauvoo Polygamy:...but we called it celestial marriage by George D. Smith. FARMS Review, Vol. 20, Issue 2. (Detailed book review)
  • Richard S. Van Wagoner, Mormon Polygamy: A History (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1989), 135.

447

 Joseph F. Smith wrote to Orson Pratt that a “few years ago [I] tried to get affidavits regarding Joseph Smith and ‘celestial marriage.’ . . . I was astonished at the scarcity of evidence. I might say almost total absence of direct evidence upon the subject as connected with the prophet Joseph himself.”
  • Joseph F. Smith to Orson Pratt Sr., 19 July 1875, Joseph F. Smith Letterbooks, Ms d 1325, Joseph F. Smith Collection, Church History Library and Archives.

Censorship of Church History (edit)

449

 "Mormons accepted as sufficient the explanation that Joseph Smith's death was due to an angry mob, without caring to know specifically what those Illinois neighbors had been angry about.
  •  History unclear or in error
  • The author lists these works but does not give page numbers.
  1. Brigham H. Roberts, A Comprehensive History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Provo, UT: BYU Press, 1965).
  2. Joseph Fielding Smith, Essentials in Church History: A History of the Church from the Birth of Joseph Smith to the Present Time (1922), with Introductory Chapters on the Antiquity of the Gospel and The “Falling Away” (Salt Lake City: Deseret News Press, 1922).
  3. William E. Berrett, The Restored Church: A Brief History of the Origin, Growth and Doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Salt Lake City: Department of Education of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Deseret Book, 1958).
  4. Orson F. Whitney, Life of Heber C. Kimball, An Apostle; The Father and Founder of the British Mission (Salt Lake City: Kimball family, 1888).
  5. Leonard J. Arrington and Davis Bitton, The Mormon Experience: A History of the Latter-Day Saints, 2nd ed. (New York: Knopf, 1992).

Censorship of Church History (edit)

450

 "One LDS educator in 1967 wrote about the 'causes' of conflict in Nauvoo…without mentioning plural marriage."
  •  History unclear or in error
  • Kenneth W. Godfrey, “Causes of [Mormon sic] Non-Mormon Conflict in Hancock County, Illinois, 1839–1846” (PhD diss., Brigham Young University, 1967), chap 7.

Censorship of Church History (edit)

450 n. 106

 Smith cites the paper as "Causes of Non-Mormon Conflict…."
  • Correct title is: "Causes of Mormon Non-Mormon Conflict…" (emphasis added)
  •  Citation error
  • See left

Endnotes

  1. [note]  Lisle G. Brown, Nauvoo Sealings, Adoptions, and Anointings : A Comprehensive Register of Persons Receiving LDS Temple Ordinances 1841-1846 (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 2006).
  2. [note]  Dallin H. Oaks, "The Suppression of the Nauvoo Expositor," Utah Law Review 9 (1965): 862–903.
Retrieved from "https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/index.php?title=Criticism_of_Mormonism/Books/Nauvoo_Polygamy/Chapter_7&oldid=33694"