Revision as of 20:09, 16 December 2008

Overview: One Nation Under Gods

In early 2002 a new book entitled One Nation under Gods (ONUG) appeared on bookshelves, promising to tell the "real" history of the Mormon Church. In the words of its author, Richard Abanes,

It is beyond legitimate dispute that the Mormon church has for decades been painting for the general public a decidedly biased picture of the Latter-day Saint faith, especially with regard to the origins of the Book of Mormon. Fortunately, a more objective sketch of Mormonism's earliest years can be drawn using non-LDS witnesses, secular media articles, and private journals (Mormon and non-Mormon).

All of these sources will be used in this book to discover how Mormonism's founder--Joseph Smith--formed, controlled, and expanded his church, which today is one of the wealthiest and most influential religions in the world. [ONUG, xvi]

With his thesis stated and his purpose laid bare, Richard Abanes attempts to pull disparate sources together to paint a picture that, when compared to objective reality, more closely resembles a Picasso than a Rembrandt, skewed and distorted, as it is, only to nourish the over-arching ego of the work's creator, while obscuring and maligning the actual doctrines and beliefs as understood and practiced by members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints for more than 150 years.

Of course, if you ask Abanes, he stands by his work and insists that it is competent and unbiased from a scholarly perspective. Anybody even remotely familiar with the workings of the anti-Mormon cottage industry, however, is given pause when they learn of the seed of Richard's interest in Mormonism. In his acknowledgments he thanks avowed professional anti-Mormons Sandra and Jerald Tanner for their publication of Mormonism--Shadow or Reality?, saying it was his "introduction to Mormonism more than a dozen years ago." [ONUG, xi] Further, Sandra Tanner wrote a glowing Foreword to the book, and provided a dust-jacket blurb that states (in part),

One Nation under Gods is a well-written and absorbing book that is ideal for anyone wanting a concise, accurate, and easy-to-understand history of Mormonism from its inception to the present.

Unfortunately, experience has proven that anything Sandra Tanner endorses as being "accurate" about the Mormon Church is bound to be, in the final evaluation, anything but accurate. (See, for example, They Lie In Wait to Deceive, Vol. 1 or Jerald and Sandra Tanner’s Distorted View of Mormonism: A Response to Mormonism--Shadow or Reality.)

Be that as it may, we are now left with One Nation under Gods, with its 473 pages of prose and an additional 144 pages of endnotes. In a dust-jacket blurb, professional anti-Mormon Hank Hanegraaf (associated with the Christian Research Institute), apparently awed by the prodigious quantity of endnotes, praises Abanes' work by stating that "One Nation under Gods is documented as meticulously as any scholarly work." The author has been quick to point out, in various e-mails, that his book is well-documented and scholarly in its approach. This brings to mind a statement by Douglas E. Cowan, Assistant Professor of Religious Studies and Sociology at the University of Missouri:

My favorite example of questionable scholarship is the use made of the humble endnote. When the Christian Research Institute issued an official statement about fellow apologist Dave Hunt, and claimed that, although they considered him a "brother in Christ," they did not regard him as a credible scholar, Hunt was outraged. "I’m not a scholar? How is that defined? In spite of the more than 800 footnotes in A Woman Rides the Beast, I’m not thorough in my research?" (Hunt 1995: 3). Occult Invasion (1998) contains nearly fifteen hundred endnotes. That countercult apologists employ the apparatus of scholarship is, of course, not the issue; how those apparatus are employed is. What are the sources and are they reliable? Are they quoted fairly and correctly? The mere use of scholarly apparatus in no way ensures the reliability of the information provided. [Douglas E. Cowan, "Reflections on Louisville: The Christian Countercult in Conversation," http://www.cesnur.org/2002/slc/cowan.htm (Center for Studies on New Religions, June 2002).]

Thus it is with One Nation under Gods. Through the use of questionable scholarship and misuse of sources, author Richard Abanes has set about to prove the very thesis and accomplish the very purpose he laid out in his preface. Of course, authors such as Abanes are convinced that the sheer volume of endnotes will awe the average reader and convince him or her that the conclusions being presented are indeed factual. Fortunately, his sources can be checked.

Which brings us to this work in progress. Some of the members of FAIR, seeking to shed the light of day on how authors like Abanes do their work, have researched many of his sources and looked up his quotes. If you want to see the type of "scholarly" use to which Abanes has put his quotes, feel free to click on any of the links below. Each of them examine a single use of a fact or a single citation improperly used by Abanes. Each of them explains the reality behind the quote and the truth behind the fact. As you explore this information, we are sure that you will begin to recognize Abanes as a "surrealist" writer, who is bent on doing with words exactly what Picasso did with pigments—present a twisted and surreal view of reality. In this case, the reality of normal people living normal lives and seeking to worship and serve God to the best of their ability.

As members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and volunteer members of FAIR, it is our hope that this work will help to "set the record straight" and clarify many of the distortions and misrepresentations accorded our doctrine and beliefs by One Nation under Gods. It is our desire to increase understanding and goodwill among all sincere seekers of truth; that you may gain greater insight into the Christ-centered principles and practices that have directed His Church since its restoration in 1830.