Difference between revisions of "Question: Do we need to know where the Book of Mormon took place?"

m (Response)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
==Response==
 
==Response==
It is not required for salvation to know were the Book of Mormon took place. For Latter Day Saints, its up to the Lord if he will reveal were the Book of Mormon events took place. As for the Bible, their are no maps in biblical scritures, nor directions given for people to know were many Biblical lands and sites are. For most Christians this means the GOD did not revealed the location were many biblical lands and sites are.
+
It is not required for salvation to know where the Book of Mormon took place. Critics often exaggerate the extent to which [[Archeology_and_the_Bible|Biblical locations]] are known, and ignore the disadvantages under which [[Book_of_Mormon_archaeology|New World archaeology]] labors compared to the Old World.
  
Scholars have found powerful evidences, and are almost certain that the trail of Leih has been found, yet their is still no official position on the geography(Old or New world) of the Book of Mormon.
+
Critics also ignore that there is substantial evidence for the [[Book_of_Mormon_geography/Old_WorldOld World]] accounts in the Book of Mormon that were not known in Joseph Smith's day.
  
As for the maps on the official KJV Bible published by the Church, for example, one shows the Exodus route as "possible route of the Exodus" and shows Mt. Sinai with a question mark. Their is no official possition were many Biblical lands and sites are.
+
Most LDS scholars believe that a Mesoamerican setting best matches the Book of Mormon data, but [[Template:BoMGeoTableList|other models]] have been advanced by others. Given that the Church has [[Book_of_Mormon_geography/Statements]] no revealed geography outside the Book of Mormon text, it is unlikely that a "Church-endorsed" map will be published.  This does not prevent other researchers from seeking the most plausible correlation.
 
 
Most modern scholars agree were Book of Mormon lands might be located in the New World, which is MesoAmerica. The church can publish a map of highly possible Book of Mormon lands in a new edition of the Book of Mormon if its decided.
 
  
 
==Conclusion==
 
==Conclusion==

Revision as of 16:09, 31 August 2008

This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.

 [needs work]

Criticism

Critics claim that the Church has no official position on geography of the Book of Mormon becuase the lands in the Book of Mormon never existed.

Source(s) of the criticism

Response

It is not required for salvation to know where the Book of Mormon took place. Critics often exaggerate the extent to which Biblical locations are known, and ignore the disadvantages under which New World archaeology labors compared to the Old World.

Critics also ignore that there is substantial evidence for the Book_of_Mormon_geography/Old_WorldOld World accounts in the Book of Mormon that were not known in Joseph Smith's day.

Most LDS scholars believe that a Mesoamerican setting best matches the Book of Mormon data, but other models have been advanced by others. Given that the Church has Book_of_Mormon_geography/Statements no revealed geography outside the Book of Mormon text, it is unlikely that a "Church-endorsed" map will be published. This does not prevent other researchers from seeking the most plausible correlation.

Conclusion

Endnotes

None


Further reading

FAIR wiki articles

Template:BoMGeographyWiki

FAIR web site

  • FairMormon Topical Guide: Archaeology and the Bible FairMormon link
  • FairMormon Topical Guide: Book of Mormon geography FairMormon link
  • Brant Gardner, "Behind the Mask, Behind the Curtain: Uncovering the Illusion (Review of: The Bible vs. the Book of Mormon)," FARMS Review 17/2 (2005): 144–196. off-site FAIR link; originally available on FAIR link

External links

Printed material