![FairMormon Logo](https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/2021_fair_logo_primary.png)
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
GregKearney (talk | contribs) (→Response) |
GregKearney (talk | contribs) (→Conclusion) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
==Conclusion== | ==Conclusion== | ||
+ | Given Joseph Smith long family ties to the institution of Freemasonry and the fact that he would, in 1842 become a Masonr himself it seems unlikely that anti-masonry was the source of the Gadianton robers found in the Book of Mormon. | ||
− | + | Any similarities which do exist are better explaind by Joseph using the language form of his time and place in the translation of the Book of Mormon. | |
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== |
This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.
Critics claim that the Gadianton robbers are thinly disguised references to the anti-Masonic panic of Joseph Smith's era.
While many have speculated on the use of anti-masonic language in the Book of Mormon text as proof of Joseph Smith authorship of the same. The authors of these speculations fail to take into account three critical issues which would tend to discredit the association between the Gadiantion robbers of the Book of Mormon and the anti-Masonry of the opening decades of the 19th century [1826 through 1845].
1. Joseph Smith grew up in and was surrouned by Freemasons in his home. Both his father, Joseph Smith, Sr. and elder brother Hyrum Smith were Masons in New York. It would seem unlikely that Joseph would be using anti-masonic language and terms, and meaning it as such, given his family's close connection and association with the institution of Freemasonry.
2. The Book of Mormon is a translation. As such it refelct the time and place that it was translated in. Any similarity between the language of the anti-masonic movement and Joseph's translation can better be expained by Joseph using the language of his time and place rather than by a deliberate connection to anti-masonry.
3. In 1842 Joseph Smith himself became a Mason. It would seem unlikey that had Joseph intened to tie the Gadianton robber of the Book of Mormon to the Freemasons that with in a span of less than 15 years he would be found joining that very group. This is even more the case when you condier that it has been reported that one of Joseph's plural wives was none other than Lucinda Morgan, the widow of William Morgan who's mystrious death in upstate New York in 1826 was the spark of the anti-masonry political movement.
Given Joseph Smith long family ties to the institution of Freemasonry and the fact that he would, in 1842 become a Masonr himself it seems unlikely that anti-masonry was the source of the Gadianton robers found in the Book of Mormon.
Any similarities which do exist are better explaind by Joseph using the language form of his time and place in the translation of the Book of Mormon.
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now