Difference between revisions of "Question: Were the Isaiah passages in the Book of Mormon simply plagiarized from the King James Bible?"

m (Question: Were the Isaiah passages in the Book of Mormon simply plagiarized from the King James Bible?)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Main Page}}
+
#REDIRECT[[Isaiah_and_the_Book_of_Mormon#Were_the_Isaiah_passages_in_the_Book_of_Mormon_simply_plagiarized_from_the_King_James_Bible.3F]]
<onlyinclude>
 
==Question: Were the Isaiah passages in the Book of Mormon simply plagiarized from the King James Bible?==
 
===Nephi and Jacob generally make it clear when they are quoting from Isaiah===
 
 
 
If a Christian is making an accusation of plagiarism, then they are, by the same logic, indicting the Bible which they share with us. Close examination of the Old Testament reveals many passages which are copied nearly word for word including grammatical errors. Micah, who lived hundreds of years after Isaiah, copies word for word in {{b||Micah|4|1-3}} from Isaiah's prophecy in {{b||Isaiah|2|2-4}} without once giving him credit.<ref>See A. Melvin McDonald, ''Day of Defense'' (Sounds of Zion Inc., 1986; 2004), 49.</ref> We also find the genealogy from {{b||Genesis|5|10-11,36}} repeated in 1 Chronicles, much of the history in Samuel and Kings is repeated in Chronicles, and {{b||Isaiah|36|2}} through {{b||Isaiah|38|5}} is the same as {{b|2|Kings|18|17}} through {{b|2|Kings|20|6}}.
 
 
 
Although Old Testament scripture was often quoted by Old and New Testament writers without giving credit, Nephi and Jacob generally make it clear when they are quoting from Isaiah. Indeed, much of 2 Nephi may be seen as an Isaiah commentary. Of course, Nephi and Jacob do not specify chapter and verse, because these are modern additions to the text (as Joseph Smith somehow knew). It is ironic that critics of the Book of Mormon find fault with its "plagiarism," even though its authors typically mention their sources, while they do not condemn the Bible's authors when they do not.
 
 
 
Additionally, the Church has made clear in  the 1981 and the 2013 editions of the Book of Mormon <ref>These were the only editions consulted for this point. More editions may render the same however the author did not have access to them at this time.</ref> in footnote "a" for 2 Nephi 12:2 that: "Comparison with the King James Bible in English shows that there are differences in more than half of the 433 verses of Isaiah quoted in the Book of Mormon, while about 200 verses have the same wording as the KJV"<ref>See page 81 of either edition of the Book of Mormon</ref> Thus it doesn't appear that the Church is afraid of having its members understand the similarities and differences between the King James Version of the Bible and the Book of Mormon.
 
 
 
Finally, it may be that the use of King James language for passages shared by the Bible and the Book of Mormon allows the Book of Mormon to highlight those areas in which the Book of Mormon's original texts were genuinely different from the textual tradition of the Old World's which gave us the Holy Bible of today.
 
 
 
===A closer look at these duplicate Isaiah texts actually provides us an additional witness of the Book of Mormon's authenticity===
 
A closer look at these duplicate texts actually provides us an additional witness of the Book of Mormon's authenticity.<ref>See Michael Hickenbotham, ''Answering Challenging Mormon Questions: Replies to 130 Queries by Friends and Critics of the LDS Church''  (Springville, UT: Cedar Fort Publisher, 2004),193–196.{{NB}}</ref>
 
 
 
The 21 chapters of Isaiah which are quoted (Chapters 2-14, 29, and 48-54) either partially or completely, represent about one-third of the book of Isaiah, but less than two and one-half percent of the total Book of Mormon. We also find that more than half of all verses quoted from Isaiah (234 of 433) differ from the King James version available to Joseph Smith.<ref>See Book of Mormon note to {{s|2|Nephi|12|2}}</ref> Perhaps it may be said that the Book of Mormon follows the King James (Masoretic) text when the original meaning is closer to how the King James renders the passages in question.
 
 
 
Additionally, we often find differences in Book of Mormon Isaiah texts where modern renderings of the text disagree.<ref>See also See also Kirk Holland Vestal and Arthur Wallace, ''The Firm Foundation of Mormonism'' (Los Angeles, CA: The L. L. Company, 1981), 70–72.</ref> One verse ({{s|2|Nephi|12|16}}), is not only different but adds a completely new phrase: "And upon all the ships of the sea." This non-King James addition agrees with the Greek (Septuagint) version of the Bible, which was first translated into English in 1808 by Charles Thomson. <ref>The implications of this change represent a more complicated textual history than previously thought. See discussion in {{Seely:Upon All The Ships Of The Sea And:JBMS:2005}}  For earlier discussions, see {{TruthGodmakers1 | start=172}}; see also {{AncientAmericaBoM|start=100|end=102}}; {{Nibley7|start=129|end=143}}</ref> Such a translation was "rare for its time."<ref>Wikipedia, "Thomson's Translation," <http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomson%27s_Translation> (11 February 2015).</ref> The textual variants in the two texts have theological import and ancient support. John Tvedtnes has documented many in [https://rsc.byu.edu/archived/isaiah-and-prophets-inspired-voices-old-testament/isaiah-variants-book-mormon this study] of the Isaiah variants in the Book of Mormon. A critic, David Wright, responded to Tvedtnes and Tvedtnes’ review of that critic’s response can be found [https://publications.mi.byu.edu/publications/review/16/2/S00010-5176acd58d92110Tvedtnes.pdf here].
 
 
 
===Accounting for the Rest of the Book of Mormon===
 
If Joseph or anyone else actually tried to plagiarize the Book of Mormon, critics have failed to show the source of the remaining 93% (when all similar texts are removed). A 100% non-biblical book of scripture wouldn't have been much more difficult to produce.
 
 
 
{{InterpreterBar
 
|link=https://www.mormoninterpreter.com/was-joseph-smith-smarter-than-the-average-fourth-year-hebrew-student-finding-a-restoration-significant-hebraism-in-book-of-mormon-isaiah/
 
|title=Was Joseph Smith Smarter Than the Average Fourth Year Hebrew Student? Finding a Restoration-Significant Hebraism in Book of Mormon Isaiah
 
|author= Paul Y. Hoskisson
 
|publication=Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture
 
|vol=17
 
|num=8
 
|date=2016
 
|summary= The brass plates version of Isaiah 2:2, as contained in 2 Nephi 12:2, contains a small difference, not attested in any other pre-1830 Isaiah witness, that not only helps clarify the meaning but also ties the verse to events of the Restoration. The change does so by introducing a Hebraism that would have been impossible for Joseph Smith, the Prophet, to have produced on his own.
 
}}
 
</onlyinclude>
 
{{endnotes sources}}
 
 
 
 
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
[[Category:An Insider's View of Mormon Origins]]
 
[[Category:Letter to a CES Director]]
 
[[Category:MormonThink]]
 
 
 
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Fueron los pasajes de Isaías en el Libro de Mormón simplemente plagiado de la Biblia King James?]]
 
[[pt:Pergunta: Foram as passagens de Isaías no Livro de Mórmon simplesmente plagiado da Bíblia King James?]]
 
[[Category:Questions]]
 

Latest revision as of 13:49, 2 June 2024