|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{Main Page}}
| + | #REDIRECT[[Bible passages in the Book of Mormon#Did Joseph Smith use characters from the Bible as templates for the characters in the Book of Mormon?]] |
| − | <onlyinclude>
| + | <!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE --> |
| − | ==Question: Did Joseph Smith use characters from the Bible as templates for the characters in the Book of Mormon?==
| |
| − | ===Introduction to Question===
| |
| − | Critic Fawn Brodie claimed the following in her book ''No Man Knows My History: the Life of Joseph Smith''
| |
| − | | |
| − | <blockquote>Many stories [Joseph Smith] borrowed from the Bible [for the creation of the Book of Mormon]. The daughter of Jared, like Salome, danced before a king and a decapitation followed. Aminadi, like Daniel, deciphered handwriting on a wall, and Alma was converted after the exact fashion of St. Paul. The daughters of the Lamanites were abducted like the dancing daughters of Shiloh; and Ammon, like the American counterpart of David, for want of a Goliath slew six sheep-rustlers with his sling.<ref>Fawn M. Brodie, ''No Man Knows My History: the Life of Joseph Smith'', 2nd ed. (New York: Vintage, 1995), 62–63.</ref></blockquote>
| |
| − | | |
| − | So how can we reconcile this? Did Joseph Smith actually use characters from the Bible as templates for Book of Mormon characters?
| |
| − | | |
| − | This article seeks to answer this question.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Response to Question===
| |
| − | ====A Few Similarities Do Not Equate to Causal Influence====
| |
| − | One thing that should be pointed out very clearly is that a few similarities do not equate to causal influence. Just because one two characters in two books are both said to have looked at a tree longingly in Central Park in New York City, doesn't mean that the one author read the other and copied the story. The same holds for the Book of Mormon as will be argued in more detail below.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ====Book of Mormon Central on Type-Scenes====
| |
| − | {{BMCentral|title=How Does the Book of Mormon Use an Ancient Storytelling Technique?|url=https://knowhy.bookofmormoncentral.org/knowhy/how-does-the-book-of-mormon-use-an-ancient-storytelling-technique|number=414}}
| |
| − | Book of Mormon Central has produced an excellent article that may explain this type of “plagiarism” in the Book of Mormon. That article is reproduced in full (including citations for easy reference) below:
| |
| − | | |
| − | :In Genesis 24, Abraham sent his servant to a foreign land to find a wife for Isaac. When he got there, he met a girl named Rebekah at a well, she drew water for him, she ran off to tell her family about it, and later she and Isaac were betrothed. Something similar happened to Jacob. He went to a foreign land to find a wife, he met Rachael by a well, he drew water for her, she ran to tell her family, and Jacob and Rachael were betrothed (see Genesis 29). As with all true stories, the author could have told these stories in many different ways.<ref>For a concrete example of this in the Book of Mormon, see Book of Mormon Central, “[https://knowhy.bookofmormoncentral.org/content/why-are-there-multiple-accounts-of-joseph-smith-and-almas-visions Why Are there Multiple Accounts of Joseph Smith's and Alma's Visions? (Alma 36:6–7)],” ''KnoWhy'' 264 (January 20, 2017).</ref> However, the reason these two stories are so similar is because they are both based on the same pattern, called a type-scene.<ref>For an introduction to type-scenes, see Michael Austin, “[https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.18809/jbms.2017.0102?seq=1 How the Book of Mormon Reads the Bible: A Theory of Types],” ''Journal of Book of Mormon Studies'' 26, (2017): 51–53. For one perspective on how type-scenes are a subtle witness for the authenticity of the Book of Mormon, see Alan Goff, “[https://archive.bookofmormoncentral.org/content/uncritical-theory-and-thin-description-resistance-history Uncritical Theory and Thin Description: The Resistance to History],” ''Review of Books on the Book of Mormon'' 7, no. 1 (1995): 187–190.</ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | :A type-scene is an ancient storytelling technique where certain kinds of stories are told in certain ways.<ref>For a few examples other examples of type-scenes in the Book of Mormon, see Richard Dilworth Rust, “[https://archive.bookofmormoncentral.org/content/recurrence-book-mormon-narratives Recurrence in Book of Mormon Narratives],” ''Journal of Book of Mormon Studies'' 3, no. 1 (1994): 42–43.</ref> The ancient audience expected that when a main character got engaged, for example, he would journey to a foreign land, encounter a woman at a well, and draw water from the well.<ref>Robert Alter, ''The Art of Biblical Narrative'', 2nd ed. (New York, NY: Basic Books, 2011), 62.</ref> Then the woman would rush home to tell the family, and the man and the woman would be betrothed.<ref>Ibid.</ref> However, each time the storyteller applied this type-scene to a new character, they would change the story slightly. This allowed the type-scene to fit each character’s historical circumstances, but also gave insights into the personalities of each character in the story.<ref>Ibid., 63.</ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | :For instance, biblical scholar Robert Alter noted that “it is only in [Isaac's] betrothal scene that the girl, not the stranger, draws water from the well.”<ref>Ibid., 64.</ref> This fits well with what we see Rebekah doing later, when she took “the initiative at a crucial moment in the story in order to obtain the paternal blessing for her favored son, Jacob.”<ref>Ibid.</ref> Ultimately, “Rebekah is to become the shrewdest and the most potent of the matriarchs, and so it is entirely appropriate that she should dominate her betrothal scene.”<ref>Ibid.</ref> The more these stories differ from the basic type-scene, the more one can expect that the characters in the scene will turn out differently than expected.<ref>For one example of this, see Ibid., 70.</ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Alan Goff has pointed out a radically different, but still recognizable, version of this type scene in Alma 17.<ref>Alan Goff, “[https://archive.bookofmormoncentral.org/content/reduction-and-enlargement-harold-bloom%E2%80%99s-mormons Reduction and Enlargement: Harold Bloom’s Mormons],” ''Review of Books on the Book of Mormon'' 5, no. 1 (1993): 105.</ref> Just as in the classic type-scene, Ammon went to a foreign land, but in this case, he went to preach the gospel (Alma 17:12).<ref>Ibid.</ref> Although Ammon did not meet a woman there, the king offered Ammon his daughter in marriage, but he declined (v. 24).<ref>Ibid.</ref> Shortly thereafter, Ammon went to the waters of Sebus, rather than a well, to water the flocks (v. 26).<ref>Ibid.</ref> Finally, instead of the woman returning to tell the family about the presence of a potential suitor, the servants returned to the king with the arms of the would-be sheep rustlers (v. 39).<ref>For more context on this story, see Brant A. Gardner, ''Second Witness: Analytical and Contextual Commentary on the Book of Mormon'', 6 vols. (Salt Lake City, UT: Greg Kofford Books, 2007), 4:275–276.</ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | :The differences between the basic type-scene and the Ammon story teach us much about Ammon and how we can be like him. Instead of going to a foreign land to find a wife, Ammon went to a foreign land to preach the gospel. When he got there and was offered the hand of the princess, he declined, stating that he wished to work for the king of the Lamanites instead. In addition to simply drawing water for the flocks, he saved them at the peril of his own life. Finally, those present at the watering of the flocks returned to tell the king not about Ammon as a potential suitor, but about the power of God that was with him.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :The Ammon story takes the type-scene, in which the hero is simply trying to find a wife, and turns it on its head. Everything Ammon does in the story is done for selfless reasons. The last part of the type-scene, in which the hero becomes betrothed, is conspicuous by its absence. Ammon does not become betrothed at the end of the story because that was not his purpose in traveling to the land of the Lamanites. He went to the Lamanites to preach the gospel and remained focused on that goal the entire time he was in Lamanite lands.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :It is easy for us to become so focused on ourselves and our own needs that we rarely think about those around us. Mormon’s masterful reworking of this type-scene reminds us all of the importance of putting others first. If we will all replace selfishness with selflessness, like Ammon did, we can be a true force for good in the lives of those around us and have the power of God with us in our lives, like Ammon did.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Book of Mormon Central has also produced this video on the subject:
| |
| − | | |
| − | <embedvideo service="youtube">v=rVvmudjdYcQ&t</embedvideo>
| |
| − | | |
| − | So how then does this literary device then work with different characters in the Book of Mormon? Let’s take the claims one by one.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ====The Daughter of Jared and Salome====
| |
| − | BYU Professor Nicholas J. Frederick has authored an insightful paper on this very question in the book ''Illuminating the Jaredite Records'' published by the Book of Mormon Academy.<ref>Nicholas J. Frederick, "Whence the Daughter of Jared?" in ''Illuminating the Jaredite Records'', ed. Daniel L. Belnap (Provo, UT: BYU Religious Studies Center; Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 2020), 236–51.</ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | Frederick points out that similarities do exist. Both stories involve:
| |
| − | #An unnamed daughter
| |
| − | #A female performing a dance before a powerful male figure
| |
| − | #Demands for decapitation—one realized, the other foiled
| |
| − | #Revenge against a perceived injustice
| |
| − | #Swearing of oaths with unfortunate consequences (the beheading of John the Baptist and the destruction of the Jaredites).
| |
| − | | |
| − | But Frederick also points out important dissimilarities:
| |
| − | #"[I]n Ether 8 the daughters of Jared is the primary actor; it is she who puts the evil ideas into her father's head and dances before Akish. In Mark's account Salome acts at her mother's behest and presumably does not know that her dance will result in John's death until her mother instructs her after the dance to ask for John's head (see 6:24). She is as much of a pawn in her mother's game as Herod is. Because of this, the daughter of Jared seems to occupy the position or role of both Herodias and Salome , as if both figures were collapsed into one Jaredite female."<ref>Ibid., 239.</ref>
| |
| − | #The audience of the dance: "Salome dances for her father and his friends, while the daughter of Jared dances for a potential husband. The presence of Herod's guests presumably ensures that Salome's request will not be dismissed, an action that would likely have caused Herod to lose face. The daughters of Jared, in the same fashion, has exactly the audience she requires."<ref>Ibid.</ref>
| |
| − | #The nature of the request. "Herod is clearly uncomfortable offering up John's head, but he has little choice—his promise must be kept. Akish appears completely comfortable with the request to carry out the murderous plot, as are, one assumes, both Jared and his daughter."<ref>Ibid.</ref>
| |
| − | #The nature of the dance itself. "The daughter of Jared's dance is prefaced by Moroni's statement that Jared's daughter was "exceedingly fair," suggesting a likely sensual element to her dance, on that is expected to appeal to Akish and that will lead to his matrimonial request. While there is nothing in the text to suggest a salaciousness to the dance itself, it does appear designed to highlight the woman's physical attractiveness. In contrast, Salome is described simply as a 'damsel' (Mark 6:22), and no mention is made of her physical appearance. Nor is there any suggestion that her dance was in any way seductive or erotic, only that it 'pleased Herod' (v. 22). Again, to suggest without textual evidence that Salome's dance contained a lascivious element or that it was, in the words of one scholar, 'hardly more than a striptease' is to surely go beyond the mark."<ref>Ibid.</ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | Frederick proposes a few possible scenarios to answer the question of how we got a story this similar to Salome in the Book of Mormon:
| |
| − | #Salome is a direct analogue for the daughter of Jared. This idea, as observed by Frederick, simply does not work.
| |
| − | #See the daughter of Jared as a coupling of both Herodias and Salome, a move that combines these two women into one remarkable figure. Yet even then the daughter of Jared is more Herodias than Salome. The dance itself is the only contribution of Salome to the daughter of Jared's story.
| |
| − | #See Ether 8 drawing on the Salome story in the nineteenth century with its oversexualized portrayal of Salome. Yet even this does not do the daughter or Jared justice. The daughter of Jared is depicted as calm, shrewd, devoted, knowledgeable, and self-sacrificing. She may be beautiful, but her beauty is one of her features; it does not define her.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Hugh Nibley writes that the account of the daughter of Jared is more similar to ancient accounts that use the same motifs of the dancing princess, old king, and challenger to the throne of the king.
| |
| − | | |
| − | <blockquote>This is indeed a strange and terrible tradition of throne succession, yet there is no better attested tradition in the early world than the ritual of the dancing princess (represented by the ''salme'' priestess of the Babylonians, hence the name ''Salome'') who wins the heart of a stranger and induces him to marry her, behead the whole king, and mount the throne. I once collected a huge dossier on this awful woman and even read a paper on her at an annual meeting of the American Historical Association.<ref>At the Pacific Coast meeting in 1940, ARAHA (1940): 90.</ref> You find out all about the sordid triangle of the old king, the challenger, and the dancing beauty from Frazer, Jane Harrison, Altheim, B. Chweitzer, Franell, and any number of folklorists.<ref>Hugh W. Nibley, "[https://www.jstor.org/stable/3292169?refreqid=excelsior%3Ac98ae5cb8f68b537ba67cbf0c1a9b06e&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents Sparsiones]," ''Classical Journal'' 40 (1945): 541–43.</ref> The thing to note especially is that there actually seems to have been a succession rite of great antiquity that followed this pattern. It is the story behind the rites at Olympia and Ara Sacra and the wanton and shocking dances of the ritual hierodules throughout the ancient world.<ref>Ibid., for a preliminary treatment.</ref> Though it is not without actual historical parallels, as when in A.D. 998 the sister of the khalif obtained as a gift the head of the ruler of Syria,<ref>E.A. Wallis Budge, ''Chronology of Bar Hebraeus'', (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010), 1:182, "The sister of the Khalifah had a certain scribe, and Egyptian, in Syiria, and he sent and complained to her about Abu Tahir [the ruler of Syria]. . . . And because her brother always paid very great attention to her, she went and wept before him. And she received [from him] the command, and she sent [it] and killed Abu Tahir, and his head was carried to Egypt."</ref> the episode of the a dancing princess is at all times essentially a ritual, and the name of Salome is perhaps no accident, for her story is anything but unique. Certainly the book of Ether is on the soundest possible ground in attributing the behavior of the daughter of Jared to the inspiration of ritual texts – secret directories on the art of deposing an aging king. The Jaredite version, incidentally, is quite different from the Salome story of the Bible, but is identical with many earlier accounts that have come down to us in the oldest records of civilization.<ref>Hugh Nibley, ''Lehi in the Desert, The World of the Jaredites, There Were Jaredites'' (Provo, UT: FARMS, 1988), 213.</ref></blockquote>
| |
| − | | |
| − | ====Aminadi and Daniel====
| |
| − | The one connection, that both men interpreted the writings of God on a wall, is tenuous. Again, just because stories parallel each other in one respect, doesn't mean that one is dependent on the other for inspiration.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Brant A. Gardner observes:
| |
| − | | |
| − | <blockquote>The story of Aminadi [in Alma 10:2-3] clearly parallels Daniel 5:5-17 with a prophet interpreting Yahweh's writing on a wall, although there is no language dependency. There can be no textual dependency because Daniel describes events during the Babylonian captivity that postdates Lehi's departure from Jerusalem. Just as Alma's conversion experience was similar to, but different from, Paul's (see commentary accompanying Mosiah 27:10-11), it is probable that, if we had a fuller version of Aminadi's story, we would see both similarities and differences.<ref>Brant A. Gardner, ''Second Witness: Analytical and Contextual Commentary on the Book of Mormon'', 6 vols. (Salt Lake City: Greg Kofford Books, 2007), 4:164–65.</ref></blockquote>
| |
| − | | |
| − | ====Alma and Paul====
| |
| − | This criticism needs to be looked at in more depth since it has received the largest amount of attention from critics, apologists, and other scholars. We have an entire page at the link below:
| |
| − | | |
| − | {{Main|Question: Did Joseph Smith use Paul as a template for the character Alma in the Book of Mormon?}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | ====The Daughers of the Lamanites and the Dancing Daughters of Shiloh====
| |
| − | Latter-day Saint philosopher, historian, and Book of Mormon Scholar Alan Goff wrote a short, insightful book chapter on this parallel back in 1991:
| |
| − | | |
| − | :A minor story in the Book of Mormon provides an example of how complex the task of reading the book can be. It also illustrates how much richer our understanding can be when we remember that the Book of Mormon is an ancient record with connections to other ancient records, particularly the Old Testament. In the book of Mosiah, a band of wicked priests hid in the wilderness and kidnapped some young women to be their wives (see 20:1-5). This story can be read as an adventure tale. If looked at carefully, however, it shows the kind of connections between the Book of Mormon and the Old Testament that demonstrate that the Book of Mormon is an ancient book.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :The story of kidnapping by the wicked priests is a minor part of the record of the people of Zeniff. When King Noah, ruler over the Zeniffites, rejected the prophet Abinadi's message and had him killed, the priest Alma and his followers separated from the rest of the people. Soon thereafter, the Lamanites attacked the people of Zeniff. As they fled from the Lamanites, F ng Noah commanded them to abandon their families. Instead, they executed Noah and attempted to kill his priests (see Mosiah 17-19). These priests escaped into the wilderness, led by Amu- lon, one of their number, and later kidnapped some daughtersof the Lamanites to be their wives. Angered by the kidnappingand assuming the Zeniffites were guilty, the Lamanites attacked them. Peace was restored when the Lamanites learned who the real kidnappers were (see Mosiah 20).
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::'''A Biblical Parallel'''
| |
| − | | |
| − | :This story of the abduction of young Lamanite women is similar to a story in the Bible in which men from the tribe of Benjamin kidnap daughters of Israel at Shiloh. The end of the book of Judges contains three stories about the tribe of Benjamin. In the first, Benjaminites abused and murdered a Levite concubine (see Judges 20). In the second, the other eleven tribes gathered to punish the offenders, and a civil war resulted (see Judges 19). The third story tells of the kidnapping (see Judges 21).
| |
| − | | |
| − | :After destroying most of the tribe of Benjamin, the Israelites realized that this tribe was in danger of extinction. To preserve the tribe, the Benjaminites needed wives. But the Israelites had vowed not to allow their daughters to marry the Benjaminites. To get around their vow, they instructed the Benjaminites to kidnap the daughters of the Israelites who lived at Shiloh while the young women danced in the vineyards. As the daughters of Shiloh gathered, the Benjaminites lay hidden. The girls danced, and the Benjaminites stole them to be their wives.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::'''The Stealing of the Daughters of the Lamanites'''
| |
| − | | |
| − | :The similarities between the stories in Mosiah and Judges are complex and carefully stated:
| |
| − | | |
| − | :{| valign="top" border="1" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
| |
| − | !width="50%"|
| |
| − | !width="50%"| | |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |Then they said, Behold, there is a feast of the Lord in Shiloh yearly in a place which is on the north side of Bethel, on the east side of the highway that goeth up from Bethel to Shechem, and on the south of Lebonah. Therefore they commanded the children of Benjamin, saying, Go and lie in wait in the vineyards; and see, and behold, if the daughters of Shiloh come out to dance in dances, then come ye out of the vineyards, and catch you every man his wife of the daughters of Shiloh, and go to the land of Benjamin (Judges 21:19-21).
| |
| − | ||Now there was a place in Shemlon where the daughters of the Lamanites did gather themselves together to sing, and to dance, and to make themselves merry. And it came to pass that there was one day a small number of them gathered together to sing and to dance (Mosiah 20:1-2).
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − | | |
| − | :The Bible clearly mentions the incident as a yearly ritual. The Book of Mormon mentions it as a regular occurrence, not telling us how often (“one day"). In both stories the kidnapped virgins became the wives of the abductors. The record says that the priests of Noah, “being ashamed to return to the city of Nephi, yea, and also fearing that the people would slay them, therefore they durst not return to their wives and their children" (Mosiah 20:3), so they watched the dancers and kidnapped substitute wives. When the narrative returned to the story of Amulon and his fellow priests, the daughters of the Lamanites were then called “their wives" (Mosiah 23:33).
| |
| − | | |
| − | :In both stories, the abductors, like peeping toms, waited and watched the spectacle. The Benjaminites lay in wait in the vineyards watching the dancing. The wicked priests also found the place where the girls danced, then “they laid and watched them" (Mosiah 20:4). We know that the priests hid because in the next verse they “came forth out of their secret places" and abducted twenty-four of the dancing maidens. Not only is the watching stressed in both stories, but also the lying in wait. These were not crimes of passion, but ones of premeditation.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::'''The Meaning of Parallels'''
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Some Book of Mormon critics have seen the parallels between the two stories and concluded that Joseph Smith merely copied the story from Judges, they conclude that any similarities in stories indicate plagiarism. Biblical scholars take a more sophisticated approach than do these critics to texts that may appear to borrow from other texts. Scholars often see similarities between stories as evidence of the writer's sophistication and of the richness of the text.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :For example, the first of the stories about the Benjaminites, telling of the rape and death of a concubine, is similar to an earlier Bible story of Lot and his two visitors at Sodom. The story in Judges tells of a Levite and his concubine who were returning home from a visit to her father's house in Bethlehem. At a late hour they arrived at Gibeah, a Benjaminite city. Only one old man was willing to take the travelers in. As the host entertained, the men of the city gathered outside and demanded that the host bring the Levite outside so they could rape him. The host protested this violation of the law of hospitality and offered his own virgin daughter and the Levite's concubine as substitutes. The Levite instead pushed his concubine out to the mob, who "abused her all the night until the morning" (Judges 19:25). In the morning she was dead.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :This story is obviously similar to the story of Lot's visitors in Genesis 19. In both stories the guests were taken in, the inhabitants of the cities threatened a homosexual rape, and the host offered two women as substitutes to spare the men. Obviously readers are meant to see a relationship between the two stories. Biblical scholars see this as an example of conscious borrowing intended both to enhance the meaning of the second story and to emphasize how wicked Gibeah had become. The story in Genesis 19 can easily be read and understood with no awareness of the story in Judges 19, but to understand Judges 19 in any complete way the reader must see the connection to Sodom. The Levite was portrayed unfavorably compared to Lot's divine visitors. The visitors to Sodom effected a divine rescue, while the Levite threw out his own concubine to save himself.<ref>Stuart Lasine, "Guest and Host in Judges 19: Lot's Hospitality in an Inverted World," ''Journal for the Study of the Old Testament'' 29 (June 1984): 40.</ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | :I believe that, in a similar way, the story of the abduction in Mosiah means more when we see it light of the story in Judges. I feel that the author of the story in Mosiah borrowed consciously from the story in Judges, which he knew from the plates of brass, to help make his point.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :The story of the abduction of the daughters of Shiloh is the final story in Judges. One of the main purposes of Judges was to justify the establishment of a king. Judges described the evil the Israelites did in the Lord's sight (see Judges 3:7; 4:1), explaining that they did evil because there was no king over the people (see Judges 17:6; 18:1). Judges ends with three stories about the tribe of Benjamin that illustrate this evil. The stories are preceded by a statement about the lack of a king over the land: "And it came to pass in those days, when there was no king in Israel. . . " (Judges 19:1). The third story ends with a similar statement: "In those days there was no king in Israel: every man did that which was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25). The topsy-turvy world described in Judges 17-21 demonstrates that doing what is right in one's own eyes is often the same thing as doing what is evil in the Lord's eyes.<ref>Lasine, "Gust and Host," 55.</ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | :By emphasizing parallels to the kidnapping story in Judges, the author of the story in Mosiah seems to me to have strengthened the moral point. The wicked priests led by Amulon were also evil, doing what was right in their own eyes rather than following the Lord.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::'''Other Parallels'''
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Understandably, the text shows disapproval of all that Amulon and his fellow priests did. The parallel case from Judges of doing what is right in man's eyes is only one way the text shows this disapproval. There are other parallels that further discredit Amulon and his companions.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :After the Lamanites captured Amulon and his people, the record states that "Amulon did gain favor in the eyes of the king of the Lamanites" (Mosiah 24:1). In gaining the favor of the Lamanites, these priests clearly lost favor with God. There is a note of disapproval in the narrator's words when he says that the people of Amulon not only found favor in the eyes of the Lamanite king, but also that the king appointed these men to be teachers over all his people (see Mosiah 24:1). As teachers, these priests taught the Lamanites the language of the Nephites (see Mosiah 24:4), "nevertheless they knew not God; neither did the brethren of Amulon teach them anything concerning the Lord their God, neither the law of Moses; nor did they teach them the words of Abinadi" (Mosiah 24:5).
| |
| − | | |
| − | :On the other hand, Alma taught his people how God delivered both the followers of Limhi and Alma out of bondage (see Mosiah 25:10, 16). He also taught them "repentance and faith on the Lord" (Mosiah 25:15) as he organized them into congregations. The author emphasizes how different from Alma the priests of Noah were. He says directly that the priests of Noah didn't teach the Lamanites Abinadi's words. He also specifically mentions that Alma "went about privately among the people, and began to teach the words of Abinadi" (Mosiah 18:1). Both Alma and Amulon entered the narrative as priests of Noah. Upon hearing the words of Abinadi, Alma repented, but Amulon refused to repent. Alma taught the prophet's words in secret, while Amulon and his priests utterly refused to teach them to the Lamanites.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :The reader is led to see the contrasting lives, not just of Alma and Amulon, but of the people of Limhi and Alma and the people of Amulon. Both Alma and Amulon led colonies into the wilderness: Alma and his people, when Noah's soldiers discovered their "movement," "took their tents and their families and departed into the wilderness" (Mosiah 18:32, 34). Amulon and his followers also fled into the wilderness, but at Noah's command they left their families behind (see Mosiah 19:11-23).
| |
| − | :The wicked priests abandoned their wives when King Noah "commanded them that all the men should leave their wives and their children, and flee before the Lamanites" (Mosiah 19:11), then they went about trying to find substitute wives. The other Zeniffites would rather have perished than leave their wives and children behind (see Mosiah 19:12). Thus those who remained behind "caused that their fair daughters should stand forth and plead with the Lamanites that they would not slay them" (Mosiah 19:13). The daughters inspired "compassion" among the Lamanites, for they "were charmed with the beauty of their women" (Mosiah 19:14). Later, Amulon would do the same thing, sending out the Lamanite daughters he and the other priests had kidnapped to plead for mercy (see Mosiah 23:33-34).
| |
| − | | |
| − | :The text has set up parallel examples for the reader to compare. The Zeniffites sent men out to find those who had fled their children and wives, “all save the king and his priests" (Mosiah 19:18), and had vowed that they would return to their wives and children or die seeking revenge if the Lamanites had killed them (Mosiah 19:19). The parallel stories of sending the two sets of daughters to beg for mercy from the Lamanites teach the reader that what appear to be the same actions actually differ when performed by the good-hearted on the one hand or the evil-hearted on the other.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :When we compare the people as the text invites us to do, we contrast the care the men of Limhi showed for their wives and children with the abandonment by the priests of Noah. All of these events define the lack of moral character of the priests. The fact that the Lamanite king was willing to permit the stealing of the Lamanite daughters by welcoming Amulon and the priests into his kingdom speaks badly of this king, just as the Israelites' encouragement of the Benjaminites to kidnap their own daughters speaks badly of all Israel. The people of Limhi, on the other hand, "fought for their lives, and for their wives, and for their children" (Mosiah 20:11). These differences reveal not only the character of the priests of Noah, who abandoned their families rather than fall into Lamanite hands, but also of the Nephites, who decided to face death with their families rather than abandon them.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :The text is clearly unsympathetic to the people of Amulon. The connection between the two stories of abduction is a hint from the author that their actions were reminiscent of a time, reported in Judges, when the Israelites didn't follow God's law but did what was right in their own eyes. The priests are portrayed as indifferent to God, in spite of their position, which should have made them more anxious to follow God.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :The Book of Mormon story of the stealing of the Lamanite daughters cannot be accounted for by the simplistic claim that it was just copied from the Bible. The Book of Mormon makes sophisticated use of the story to make its own point. Critics of the Book of Mormon believe that the author of the text used the earlier story from Judges, and I agree. But unlike them, I believe that the parallel enhances the book and reveals it to be an ancient document rather than a modern imitation.<ref>Alan Goff, "The Stealing of the Daughters of the Lamanites," in ''Rediscovering the Book of Mormon'', ed. John L. Sorenson (Provo, UT: FARMS, 1992), 67–74.</ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | ====Ammon and David====
| |
| − | The only similarity between these two stories is that both men killed another individual or group with a sling. How many stories can we find authored before the Book of Mormon was translated where a protagonist defeats an antagonist with a sling? ''Hundreds''. The comparison is utterly nonsensical and flimsy.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Conclusion===
| |
| − | The presence of similarities does not seem to do anything to belief in the authenticity of the Book of Mormon. More research is sure to be forthcoming on the type-scene in the Book of Mormon and readers are encouraged to pay attention for the arrival of that literature.
| |
| − | </onlyinclude>
| |
| − | {{endnotes sources}}
| |
| | [[Category:Questions]] | | [[Category:Questions]] |
