Difference between revisions of "Repudiated ideas about race/Neutral in "war in heaven""

m
m
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
XXXX
 
XXXX
 
{{:Gospel Topics: "Today, the Church disavows the theories advanced in the past that black skin is a sign of divine disfavor or curse, or that it reflects actions in a premortal life"}}
 
{{:Joseph Fielding Smith: "We know of no scripture, ancient or modern, that declares that at the time of the rebellion in heaven that one-third of the hosts of heaven remained neutral"}}
 
{{:Question: Was the idea that Blacks were neutral in the "war in heaven" ever official doctrine?}}
 
{{:Question: Did Church leaders ever teach that Blacks were neutral in the "war in heaven?"}}
 
{{:Question: Did the Church repudiate the idea of neutrality in the "war in heaven?"}}
 
</onlyinclude>
 
 
  
 
{{Critical sources box:Mormonism and racial issues/Blacks and the priesthood/Repudiated ideas/Neutral in "war in heaven"/CriticalSources}}
 
{{Critical sources box:Mormonism and racial issues/Blacks and the priesthood/Repudiated ideas/Neutral in "war in heaven"/CriticalSources}}

Revision as of 21:25, 27 May 2024


December 25, 1869: I attended the School of the Prophets. Many questions were asked. President Young answered them. Lorenzo Young asked if the spirits of Negroes were neutral in heaven. He said someone said Joseph Smith said they were. President Young said no they were not. There were no neutral spirits in heaven at the time of the rebellion. All took sides. He said if anyone said that he heard the Prophet Joseph say that the spirits of the Blacks were neutral in heaven, he would not believe them, for he heard Joseph say to the contrary. All spirits are pure that come from the presence of God. The posterity of Cain are black because he commit[ted] murder. He killed Abel and God set a mark upon his posterity. But the spirits are pure that enter their tabernacles and there will be a chance for the redemption of all the children of Adam except the sons of perdition.

—Wilford Woodruff's Journal, entry dated Dec. 25, 1869.
∗       ∗       ∗


XXXX

Source(s) of the criticism
Critical sources

Notes