FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "User:GregSmith/Articles headings links tables/Scripture"
m |
m (→Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting) |
||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
|16||<nowiki> {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Commentary|l1=the_visual_title}} </nowiki> ||<nowiki> #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Commentary]] </nowiki> ||[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Commentary|jump to]] | |16||<nowiki> {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Commentary|l1=the_visual_title}} </nowiki> ||<nowiki> #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Commentary]] </nowiki> ||[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Commentary|jump to]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |17||<nowiki> {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#How is Genesis 3:5 used by critics | + | |17||<nowiki> {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#How is Genesis 3:5 used by critics who claim that the doctrine of deification (''theosis'') is a teaching of Satan?|l1=the_visual_title}} </nowiki> ||<nowiki> #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#How is Genesis 3:5 used by critics who claim that the doctrine of deification (''theosis'') is a teaching of Satan?]] </nowiki> ||[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#How is Genesis 3:5 used by critics who claim that the doctrine of deification (''theosis'') is a teaching of Satan?|jump to]] |
|- | |- | ||
|18||<nowiki> {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#The use of Genesis 3 to counter the doctrine of deification/theosis has two problems associated with it. The first is that Satan never claimed that Adam and Eve would be gods, just that they would be "as gods, knowing good and evil."|l1=the_visual_title}} </nowiki> ||<nowiki> #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#The use of Genesis 3 to counter the doctrine of deification/theosis has two problems associated with it. The first is that Satan never claimed that Adam and Eve would be gods, just that they would be "as gods, knowing good and evil."]] </nowiki> ||[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#The use of Genesis 3 to counter the doctrine of deification/theosis has two problems associated with it. The first is that Satan never claimed that Adam and Eve would be gods, just that they would be "as gods, knowing good and evil."|jump to]] | |18||<nowiki> {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#The use of Genesis 3 to counter the doctrine of deification/theosis has two problems associated with it. The first is that Satan never claimed that Adam and Eve would be gods, just that they would be "as gods, knowing good and evil."|l1=the_visual_title}} </nowiki> ||<nowiki> #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#The use of Genesis 3 to counter the doctrine of deification/theosis has two problems associated with it. The first is that Satan never claimed that Adam and Eve would be gods, just that they would be "as gods, knowing good and evil."]] </nowiki> ||[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#The use of Genesis 3 to counter the doctrine of deification/theosis has two problems associated with it. The first is that Satan never claimed that Adam and Eve would be gods, just that they would be "as gods, knowing good and evil."|jump to]] | ||
Revision as of 19:10, 21 May 2024
Template:GregSmithUser:BrowseBar
Contents
Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon
| Num | SeeAlso | #REDIRECT | Jump to |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | {{SeeAlso|Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Is the Church's "open canon" evidence of error because Christianity requires a "closed canon"?|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Is the Church's "open canon" evidence of error because Christianity requires a "closed canon"?]] | jump to |
| 2 | {{SeeAlso|Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#The doctrine of a closed canon and the end of authoritative revelation is not found in the Bible|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#The doctrine of a closed canon and the end of authoritative revelation is not found in the Bible]] | jump to |
| 3 | {{SeeAlso|Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#God is superior even to His Word|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#God is superior even to His Word]] | jump to |
| 4 | {{SeeAlso|Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Closed canon is not a Biblical doctrine|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Closed canon is not a Biblical doctrine]] | jump to |
| 5 | {{SeeAlso|Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Early Christians did not have a closed canon|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Early Christians did not have a closed canon]] | jump to |
| 6 | {{SeeAlso|Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Scriptural interpretation requires revelation|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Scriptural interpretation requires revelation]] | jump to |
| 7 | {{SeeAlso|Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#What does the Book of Mormon mean when it says that "plain and precious" things have been taken out of the bible?|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#What does the Book of Mormon mean when it says that "plain and precious" things have been taken out of the bible?]] | jump to |
| 8 | {{SeeAlso|Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#So called "lost scripture" is in reference to writings mentioned or cited within the present Biblical record, but which are not in the Bible itself|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#So called "lost scripture" is in reference to writings mentioned or cited within the present Biblical record, but which are not in the Bible itself]] | jump to |
| 9 | {{SeeAlso|Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Examples of "lost scripture"|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Examples of "lost scripture"]] | jump to |
| 10 | {{SeeAlso|Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Examples of canonical differences among Bibles|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Examples of canonical differences among Bibles]] | jump to |
| 11 | {{SeeAlso|Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Implications for inerrancy and sufficiency doctrine of the Bible|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Implications for inerrancy and sufficiency doctrine of the Bible]] | jump to |
| 12 | {{SeeAlso|Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Does the Bible alone contain all necessary or essential knowledge to assure salvation, thus making the Book of Mormon and modern prophets unnecessary?|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Does the Bible alone contain all necessary or essential knowledge to assure salvation, thus making the Book of Mormon and modern prophets unnecessary?]] | jump to |
| 13 | {{SeeAlso|Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#The Bible nowhere makes the claim for sufficiency or completeness|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#The Bible nowhere makes the claim for sufficiency or completeness]] | jump to |
| 14 | {{SeeAlso|Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Mormons consider the Bible an inspired volume of scripture of great value, but they also recognize that there are some errors and contradictions|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Latter-day Saint scripture and the closed canon#Mormons consider the Bible an inspired volume of scripture of great value, but they also recognize that there are some errors and contradictions]] | jump to |
Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting
| Num | SeeAlso | #REDIRECT | Jump to |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Why does the LDS Church teach that man first existed as spirits in heaven when 1 Corinthians 15:46 says that the physical body comes before the spiritual?|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Why does the LDS Church teach that man first existed as spirits in heaven when 1 Corinthians 15:46 says that the physical body comes before the spiritual?]] | jump to |
| 2 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#When Latter-day Saints speak of God creating our "spirit bodies," we do not mean the glorified, physical "spiritual body" of the resurrected|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#When Latter-day Saints speak of God creating our "spirit bodies," we do not mean the glorified, physical "spiritual body" of the resurrected]] | jump to |
| 3 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#In context, Paul is clearly talking about the physical resurrection from the dead|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#In context, Paul is clearly talking about the physical resurrection from the dead]] | jump to |
| 4 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#The "spiritual body" to which Paul refers is the resurrected physical body which has been glorified|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#The "spiritual body" to which Paul refers is the resurrected physical body which has been glorified]] | jump to |
| 5 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#How is John 4:24 used as a proof-text by critics of the Church's doctrine of God having a body?|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#How is John 4:24 used as a proof-text by critics of the Church's doctrine of God having a body?]] | jump to |
| 6 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Critics read into the passage what is not there. This passage in John does not assert anything about God's corporeal nature or lack thereof|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Critics read into the passage what is not there. This passage in John does not assert anything about God's corporeal nature or lack thereof]] | jump to |
| 7 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#King James Version|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#King James Version]] | jump to |
| 8 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Other translation(s)|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Other translation(s)]] | jump to |
| 9 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Use or misuse by Church critics|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Use or misuse by Church critics]] | jump to |
| 10 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Commentary|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Commentary]] | jump to |
| 11 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#How is Isaiah 43:10 used as a proof-text by critics of the Church doctrines of humans' ability to become like God through Christ's atonement?|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#How is Isaiah 43:10 used as a proof-text by critics of the Church doctrines of humans' ability to become like God through Christ's atonement?]] | jump to |
| 12 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#The context of this passage makes it clear that the issue being addressed is not one of general theology but rather a very specific and practical command to recognize YHWH as Israel's only god and the only god to be worshiped|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#The context of this passage makes it clear that the issue being addressed is not one of general theology but rather a very specific and practical command to recognize YHWH as Israel's only god and the only god to be worshiped]] | jump to |
| 13 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#King James Version|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#King James Version]] | jump to |
| 14 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Other translation(s)|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Other translation(s)]] | jump to |
| 15 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Use or misuse by Church critics|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Use or misuse by Church critics]] | jump to |
| 16 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Commentary|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Commentary]] | jump to |
| 17 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#How is Genesis 3:5 used by critics who claim that the doctrine of deification (''theosis'') is a teaching of Satan?|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#How is Genesis 3:5 used by critics who claim that the doctrine of deification (''theosis'') is a teaching of Satan?]] | jump to |
| 18 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#The use of Genesis 3 to counter the doctrine of deification/theosis has two problems associated with it. The first is that Satan never claimed that Adam and Eve would be gods, just that they would be "as gods, knowing good and evil."|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#The use of Genesis 3 to counter the doctrine of deification/theosis has two problems associated with it. The first is that Satan never claimed that Adam and Eve would be gods, just that they would be "as gods, knowing good and evil."]] | jump to |
| 19 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Use or misuse by Church critics|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Use or misuse by Church critics]] | jump to |
| 20 | {{SeeAlso|Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Commentary|l1=the_visual_title}} | #REDIRECT[[Common issues in interpretation and proof-texting#Commentary]] | jump to |