Difference between revisions of "Template:Interpreter:Carmack:Why The Oxford English Dictionary And Not Websters:2015"

m (top: bot - code for pages in Interpreter)
m (top: bot - Repairing page pass code so all can be corrected at once. :-))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Interpreter|author=Stanford Carmack|article=Why the Oxford English Dictionary (and not Webster's 1828)|journal=Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture|date=1 May 2015|url=https://journal.interpreterfoundation.org/why-the-oxford-english-dictionary-and-not-websters-1828|range=65–78|vol=15|num=7|article_number=155{{#if:{{{end|}}}|: {{{start}}}–{{{end}}}.|{{#if:{{{start|}}}|: {{{start}}}.|{{#if:{{{pages|}}}|:  {{{pages}}}.|.}}}}}}}}
+
{{Interpreter|author=Stanford Carmack|article=Why the Oxford English Dictionary (and not Webster's 1828)|journal=Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture|date=1 May 2015|url=https://journal.interpreterfoundation.org/why-the-oxford-english-dictionary-and-not-websters-1828|range=65–78|vol=15|num=7|article_number=155}}

Revision as of 19:06, 28 April 2024

Stanford Carmack, "Why the Oxford English Dictionary (and not Webster's 1828)," Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture 15/7 (1 May 2015). [65–78] link