Mormon responses to atheism

Summary: These articles give different responses to criticisms of Latter-day Saint theology from the standpoint of religious skepticism, agnosticism, and atheism.

Jump to Subtopic:

• The Latter-day Saint Response to W.K. Clifford on Epistemic Responsibility
• Philosophy and the Restored Gospel

The Latter-day Saint Response to W.K. Clifford on Epistemic Responsibility

Summary: This article gives an overview of English mathematician and philosopher W.K. Clifford's contribution of epistemic responsibility within the philosophy of religion, ethics, and epistemology as well as the Latter-day Saint response to it.

Jump to details:

• Question: What might be the Latter-day Saint response to criticism from epistemic responsibility?

Advantages of Latter-day Saint Theology in Philosophy

Jump to details:

• Question: What are some of the philosophical advantages of the Restored Gospel?

Subjective revelation

Summary: Critics complain that the LDS appeal to "revelation" or a "burning in the bosom" is subjective, emotion-based, and thus unreliable and susceptible to self-deception. Sectarian critics also belittle appeals to spiritual experiences, comparing them to "warm fuzzies," or merely something "felt by simply watching a Hollywood movie."

Jump to Subtopic:

• Question: Is a "burning in the bosom" simply a subjective, emotion-based, unreliable way to practice self-deception?
• Question: Why do critics of Mormonism who belong to other religions discount spiritual experiences?

Atheism