Difference between revisions of "Apostasy/Visible evidence of"

Visible evidence of the apostasy

Jump to details:

• Question: Wouldn't some Christian author or members have noticed the apostasy?

Question: Wouldn't some Christian author or members have noticed the apostasy?

There is evidence that early and later Christians realized that something vital had been lost

Since members of the Church believe that divine authority was lost during the apostasy, wouldn't some Christian author or members have noted this problem?

There is evidence that early and later Christians realized that something vital had been lost, which the Christian churches no longer possessed. That more evidence does not exist is unsurprising, given the motivation which those arrogating or ignoring priesthood authority would have had for suppression of this unpleasant reality.

See also:	Apostasy: predicted
	Apostasy: biblical evidence
	Apostasy: patristic evidence
	Apostasy: Members didn't notice?

The Bible establishes the fact that there was an official, unchangeable (Heb. 7:24) and everlasting (Ex. 40:15; Num. 25:13) priesthood in the early church which was given to those called and ordained (John 15:16; Acts 1:22; 15:4, 6, 22-23, 32; Eph. 2:20; 4:11-12; 1 Tim. 3:1-13; 5:17; 2 Tim. 1:9; 4:5; Titus 1:5) by the laying on of hands (Acts 6:1-6; 13:1-3) by those having authority (Ex. 28:1; Num. 27:15; Heb. 5:4). These priesthood holders, referred to as elders (Acts 15:2, 4, 6, 22, 23; 16:4; 20:17, etc.), bishops (1 Tim. 3:1, 2; Titus 1:7; 1 Pet. 2:20), deacons (1 Tim. 3:8, 10, 12, 13; Phil. 1:1), the presbytery (1 Tim. 4:14), and other titles, accomplished healings (Jam. 5:14-15) and other miracles (Mark 16:17-18) and led the church (Acts 15:2-6).^[1]

Some Christians have noted the loss of this authority; others had their own reasons for downplaying the issue of authority.

Noting the lack

Kirk Holland Vestal and Arthur Wallace in The Firm Foundation of Mormonism discuss authority in the early church citing the following:

The early Church father, Cyprian, discussed this vital doctrine in his 69th Letter, written about 255 A.D., when he was questioned about authority to baptize and to preside in a congregation without having been ordained to the priesthood through the proper channels. Cyprian summarized that "one who was not ordained in the Church cannot conceivably have or maintain any authority over the Church."^[2]

Michael T. Griffith observed:

The necessity of baptism by the proper authority was a firmly established doctrine of the early church. For example, Ignatius stated that no baptism was valid without the bishop's approval: "It is not right either to baptize or to celebrate the agape apart from the bishop; but whatever he approves is also pleasing to God, so that everything you do may be secure and valid."^[3] Cyprian, bishop of Carthage in the middle part of the third century, stated that no one outside of the church could administer a valid baptism.^[4]

As proof of the fact that the Christians eventually lost the gift of prophecy, Hugh Nibley cites John Chrysostom as saying that members of the church were always and everywhere asking him:

What has happened to the spiritual gifts? Why do we no longer have the gift of tongues? Where are the prophets? Why are men not chosen for office as they were anciently by direct revelation from above?^[5]

John Wesley, the founder of the Methodist Church, observed:

It does not appear that these extraordinary gifts of the Holy Ghost were common in the Church for more than two or three centuries. We seldom hear of them after that fatal period when the Emperor Constantine called himself a Christian...From this time they almost totally ceased....The Christians had no more the Spirit of Christ than the other heathens...,This was the real cause why the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Ghost were no longer to be found in the Christian Church; because the Christians were turned heathen again, and had only a dead form left.^[6]

The above Christians recognized a loss of spiritual gifts and qualified leadership but didn't seem to associate this directly with priesthood authority. Latter-day Saints were able to connected the dots and identify this critical loss of priesthood power and authority, and some other restorationist faiths agreed. Modern protestants and Catholics have not, however, drawn the same conclusions.

Ignoring the lack

One can understand why a more robust discussion of the loss of authority has not surivived from, say, the second century—such a discussion might have been suppressed by later generations. Despite this, a little does leak through. There is the early 2nd-century writing of Ignatius, in which this early bishop says to the church in Rome, “I do not, like Peter and Paul, issue orders unto you. They are apostles, but I am one condemned; they indeed are free, but I am a slave.”^[7]

Furthermore, a disturbing fraction of the church seems to have rejected (or simply ignored) the apostles and tried to assume for themselves the authority to direct matters in the churches. This is attested even in the lifetimes of the apostles. You have Paul pointing out "... that all they which are in Asia be turned away from me;" (2 Timothy 1:15) and John's experience recorded in 3 John 1:9-10:

I wrote unto the church: but Diotrephes, who loveth to have the preeminence among them, receiveth us not.

Wherefore, if I come, I will remember his deeds which he doeth, prating against us with malicious words: and not content therewith, neither doth he himself receive the brethren, and forbiddeth them that would, and casteth them out of the church.

These rebels would not be worried about the loss of apostolic authority; they had been fomenting it.

1. ↑ Michael Hickenbotham, Answering Challenging Mormon Questions: Replies to 130 Queries by Friends and Critics of the LDS Church (Horizon Publishers & Distributors, 1995) (now published by Cedar Fort Publisher: Springville, UT, 2004), 64. ISBN 0882905368. ISBN 0882907786. ISBN 0882907786.
2. ↑ The Firm Foundation of Mormonism, Kirk Holland and Arthur Wallace, (LL Company, 1981), 225-6.; citing Cyprian, 69th Letter, iii.
3. ↑ The Apostolic Fathers, 113; cited in Michael T. Griffith, Signs of the True Church of Christ (Bountiful, Utah: Horizon Publishers, 1989), 94–95.
4. ↑ The Apostolic Fathers, 113; cited in Michael T. Griffith, Signs of the True Church of Christ (Bountiful, Utah: Horizon Publishers, 1989), 94–95.
5. ↑ Hugh W. Nibley, The World and the Prophets, 3rd edition, (Vol. 3 of Collected Works of Hugh Nibley), edited by John W. Welch, Gary P. Gillum, and Don E. Norton (Salt Lake City, Utah: Deseret Book Company; Provo, Utah: Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1987), 221. Citing John Chrysostom, Patrologia Graec. 50:453; 455f, 459, 488, 51:81f, 85; 55:402; 58:479; 61:269ff, 279f; 62:526f; 63:623; etc. See also Micah 3:6-7.
6. ↑ Michael Hickenbotham, Answering Challenging Mormon Questions: Replies to 130 Queries by Friends and Critics of the LDS Church (Horizon Publishers & Distributors, 1995) (now published by Cedar Fort Publisher: Springville, UT, 2004), 24. ISBN 0882905368. ISBN 0882907786. ISBN 0882907786. Citing The More Excellent Way, Wesley's Works, Vol 7, Sermon 89, 26-27.
7. ↑ Struggles and Triumphs of Religious Liberty, cited in William F. Anderson, "Apostasy or Succession, Which?" pp. 238-9. ^{[citation needed]}